retitle 321099 please enable mozilla adressbook feature
severity 321099 wishlist
tag 321099 + wontfix
thanks
Hi,
Oliver Korff wrote:
> n the "Data Source Administration" Dialog the database type
> "Addressbook" is not working and has no "Data Source URLs" anymore. At
> least ldap was working for
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. August 2005 09:18 schrieb J.H.M. Dassen (Ray):
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 02:12:48 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > *shrugs*. Interesting that dpkg-shlibdeps didn't add the dependency on
> > > the libstlport4.6c2 p
tag 215888 + fixed-in-experimental
thanks
Hi,
DicOOo works fine in OOo2 1.9.121-1...
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41F
ersion.
Hmmyeah. Well. Will be fixed in 1.9.121-2. Thanks.
Grüße/Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA
tag 268276 + fixed-upstream
retitle 268276 [fixed for 2.0] nekudot doesn't appear under the right character
forwarded 268276 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=14069
thanks
This looks like http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=14069
which is fixed in cws gslpatches4 and wi
: 1.9.121-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OpenOffice Team
Changed-By: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
mozilla-openoffice.org - OpenOffice.org Mozilla plugin
openoffice.org2 - OpenOffice.org Office suite version 2.0
openoffice.org2-base - OpenOffi
Hi,
Am Freitag, 12. August 2005 11:29 schrieb Steffen Moeller:
> I have no [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/openoffice2/program/soffice &
> [1] 11207
ugh. don't do that. Use ooffice2, oowriter2 or whatever
> I have no [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/openoffice2/program/javaldx: error
> while load
tag 322083 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 9. August 2005 01:55 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> Can you switch from libxaw7 to the more recent libxaw8?
Is there a real reason for this except it being more recent?
$ dchroot -c unstable grep-available -FDepends libxaw7 -sPackage | grep
Package\: | wc
Am Montag, 15. August 2005 17:51 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> Am Dienstag, 9. August 2005 01:55 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> > Can you switch from libxaw7 to the more recent libxaw8?
>
> Is there a real reason for this except it being more recent?
>
> $ dchroot -c unstable grep-availa
tag 324637 + upstream
severity 324637 wishlist
retitle 324637 please provide shared library
thanks
Am Dienstag, 23. August 2005 10:26 schrieb Matthias Klose:
> Is there a reason, that hunspell doesn't build a shared library? At
> least it's a released version.
Because there simply is no one upstr
severity 324640 wishlist
tag 324640 + upstream
thanks
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 23. August 2005 10:29 schrieb Matthias Klose:
> the package is missing a shared library.
of course. because upstream doesn't ship/build one.
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : htt
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 23. August 2005 23:58 schrieb Blars Blarson:
> openoffice.org failed to build on a sparc buildd due to temporarily
> unavailable build dependancies. It has built on my sparc pbuilder.
It's unfortunately not temporary. unixodbc-dev simply is not installable in
sid at the moment
tag 324974 + moreinfo
tag 324974 + unreproducible
thanks
Ted Percival wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org2-writer
> Version: 1.9.114-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: experimental
>
> When choosing Mail Merge Wizard... on the Tools menu, OpenOffice Writer
> crashes. This is completely reproducible and
Changed-By: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
mozilla-openoffice.org - OpenOffice.org Mozilla plugin
openoffice.org2 - OpenOffice.org Office suite version 2.0
openoffice.org2-base - OpenOffice.org office suite - database
openoffice.org2-calc - OpenOffice.org office
Update of /cvs/debian-openoffice/openoffice.debian.net
In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv17181
Modified Files:
build.wml index.wml install.wml links.wml mirrors.wml
news_latest.wmi patches.wml
Log Message:
update
Index: index.wml
===
Update of /cvs/debian-openoffice/openoffice.debian.net
In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv5231
Modified Files:
index.wml
Log Message:
fix typo
Index: index.wml
===
RCS file: /cvs/debian-openoffice/openoffice.debian.net/index.wm
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The crash seems to be simply due to an incompatible ms-word file.
That's what I guessed. And that's why I suggested to file a issue
upstream attaching the file if possible or giving them an other option
to reproduce/fix that bug.
Regards,
Rene
signature.asc
Desc
severity 326091 important
retitle 326091 openoffice.org2-writer: crash at opening a ms-word document
tag 326091 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Jean-Michel wrote:
> Justification: renders package unusable
lol. Read the severity descriptions. This is *not* grave.
> I try to open a ms-word document with bo
Hi,
cuijianw wrote:
> /usr/bin/oowriter: line
> 321: /usr/lib/openoffice/program/setofficelang.bin: No such file or
> directory
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line
> 262: /usr/lib/openoffice/program/pagein: No such file or directory
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line
> 275: /usr/l
Hi,
cuijianw wrote:
> I do have the openoffice.org-bin package installed. It 's version is
> 1.1.4-7.0.1 too.
That doesn't explain why the files aren't there. The files *are* there in
the deb. Maybe something got corrupted on your side. That's why I
suggested to *re*install it if necessary (empha
severity 327052 normal
reassign 327052 ftp.debian.org
retitle 327052 please remove openoffice.org-kde from sid
thanks
Hi,
Roel van der Made wrote:
> Should it really be fixed in 1.1.4-4 or is this a new dep-bug?
[...]
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
There's no OOo for amd64.
Regards,
Rene
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> OK. So I think openoffice.org 2.0 is the correct time to abandon stlport.
> The advantages are numerous:
> * no patching around STLport build problems
We don't use the internal copy so patching is the stlports maintainers
work which he should do anyway regardless of
Hi,
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> time to break compatibility anyway. Ideally this would be made the default
> for Linux upstream and done by all distros (to preserve the illusion of binary
> compatibility...). I'm not sure who to contact about this, but feel free to
> forward this anywhere appropri
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I installed openoffice.org package successfully in etch, But When run
> openoffice, It run error as follow
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ openoffice
> OpenOffice.org for Debian - see /usr/share/doc/openoffice.org/README.Debian.gz
> running openoffice.org setup...
> /usr/lib
Hi,
Marc F. Clemente wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org2
> Version: 1.9.125
There is no such version. If you report bugs, please enter correct
version numbers.
> The debian/control file does not include the amd64 architecture. Can
> you please fix this minor oversight. Sample patch included.
Th
[ if you are replying to bugs, please let the bug Cc'ed ]
Hi,
Am Tuesday 20 September 2005 15:06 schrieben Sie:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > OOo2 may build on amd64 but working is another matter and thefefore
> > amd64 is not included in that Architecture line.
> > ...
Hi,
Drew Parsons wrote:
> 1) openoffice.org2-common Depends: openoffice.org2-l10n-en-us
>
> Is en-us *truly* necessary for OOo2 to work?
Yes. In some circumstances it just crashes without it.
> It would make more sense to me to use a virtual package
> openoffice.org2-l10n, which all the l10n p
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 18:06 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> [snip]
> > No. This is no bug. This is completely intentional. OOo1 and OOo2
> > thesauri are incompatile. OOo1 ones won't work in OOo2 and vice versa.
> > Since both use /etc/openoffi
[ please learn how to quote properly. Thanks. ]
Hi,
Ron Johnson wrote:
> So, as far as Debian is concerned, once 2 is released 1.x gets
> sent into the ether, never to be allowed back in?
That's the plan. No one would want it anyway once 2.x is released...
We're the one of last big ones ones act
Hi,
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Still, I'm thinking that there will be more than a few people,
> especially in organizational settings (where, as you known things
> tend to change more slowly), who will want to retain OOo 1.x even
> if it were dropped from the release tree.
They use stable (sarge), Or o
Hi,
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Curiosity: why won't 1.1.5 build with sid? Is sid that out of
> date (tools held back by some other dependency?), or did Sun/OOo
No. Ironically, it's apparently too up to date.
Newer gcc/binutils breaks the build. I don't really have the time to
look after that; I don't
Hi,
Drew Parsons wrote:
> Oh OK. But what does "won't work" mean?
>
> If OOo1 crashes at start up because the OOo2 thesaurus is installed, or
> vice versa, then the strong conflict makes sense.
That indeed is the case.
> But if "won't work" simply means the OOo1 thesaurus function doesn't do
>
Hi,
Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> openoffice.org2-help is therefore a necessity. openoffice.org2-help-*
> would be even better, of course...
> Are those package difficult to port ?
They are not really buildable atm.
The helpcontent2 buils needs Java and the gcj build does not work always.
And th
Hi,
A.M.P. Boelens wrote:
> When I try to execute oojvmsetup2, I get the following error:
>
> /usr/bin/oojvmsetup2: line 30: /usr/lib/openoffice2/program/jvmsetup: No such
> file or directory
> /usr/bin/oojvmsetup2: line 30: exec: /usr/lib/openoffice2/program/jvmsetup:
> cannot execute: No such
tionary version is been used in Debian as Aspell
> dictionary (aspell-it)
Is it possible to build myspell-it directly from that source püackage
then? That would be a good solution and ensures it always will be
up-to-date.
Grüße/Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debia
severity 330186 wishlist
retitle 330186 please enable usage of native fpickers per default
tag 330186 + wontfix
thanks
Hi,
Jean Pierre Rupp wrote:
> The default OpenOffice.org file dialog is confusing for the common user
> who is used to the file open and save dialogs of the desktop environment
>
Hi,
Ranitha Mapatuna wrote:
> Adding
> $ENV{GDK_PIXBUF_MODULE_FILE} = '/etc/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf.loaders32';
> to /usr/bin/ooffice2 sets the right config file for the gdk pixbuf
> loaders.
Why is that needed?
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Hi,
Ranitha Mapatuna wrote:
> without it you get
> ** (soffice.bin.real:19632): WARNING **: Pixbuf theme: Cannot load
> pixmap file /home/ranitha/.themes/ale-panther_gtk2/gtk-2.0/up.png:
> Unable to load image-loading
> module: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so:
> /usr/lib/gt
Hi,
Jean Pierre Rupp wrote:
> El lun, 26-09-2005 a las 18:43 +0200, Rene Engelhard escribi?:
> > - need utf8-encoded filesystem. Not all persons use utf8. And if you
> > don't you won't be able to open your files with e.g. the GNOME Fpicker
> > when they have
Hi,
Fiona G?nther wrote:
> Are there any plans to have 2.0.0rc1 packaged into experimental? And what
> about unstable?
Yes. Give us some time please. I am working on it...
But it's not thatmuch functionality difference to 2.0beta2 anyway...
> Another thing: Will there be an more or less "offici
Hi,
Jean Pierre Rupp wrote:
> El mar, 27-09-2005 a las 18:31 +0200, Rene Engelhard escribió:
> > And I am *not* talking about gnome-vfs. I am talking about OOos native
> > ftp and webdav support. And did you even try it? It does *not* work. Try
> > opening such a URL. (i.e.
Hi,
reassign 331415 openoffice.org
tag 331415 + fixed-in-experimental
thanks
Hi,
Am Montag, 3. Oktober 2005 13:53 schrieb Martin A. Hansen:
> having a virtual desktop suddenly freeze because there on one of the
> desks has popped up a prompt for autosave is hideous!
? How should I understand th
reassign 330447 openoffice.org
thanks
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2005 01:39 schrieb Filipus Klutiero:
> Package: openoffice.org-debian-files
> Version: 1.1.4-6+1
> Severity: minor
This is no bug in -debian-files. -debian-files just contains the wrapper
script and some debian-specific files.
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2005 13:51 schrieben Sie:
> I came across this website and I thought it might interest you
> to provide the Debian-related info on the bottom of the page:
>
> http://developer.classpath.org/mediation/OpenOffice2GCJ4
Already known. Thanks anyway.
Regards,
Rene
--
.'
Hi,
please quote properly. Thanks.
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> >Well, it says you are missing the help, isn't it?
> >
> More or less. It says that...a "requested document does not exist in the
> database". There are two ways to interpret this. First, OOo requested a
> document that isn't there...
severity 332470 wishlist
retitle 332470 please use -quickstart in the menu
thanks
Hi,
David Hugh-Jones wrote:
> I am desperate to increase startup time for apps so as to waste fewer
> brain cycles. I have installed ooquickstart-gnome. But for this to
> work, openoffice has to be started with the
reassign 333547 openoffice.org
tag 333547 + moreinfo
tag 333547 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Eric Valette wrote:
> I have a document (that I cannot share) where the spellchecker only checks
> part of the frontpage and says spelling complete when the same document using
> the windows version is c
reassign 333551 openoffice.org2
thanks
Hi,
Eric Valette wrote:
> No more information needed. I think the help is not even buildable but
Right.
> the help daemon that suggest things still pops-up.
And you suggest we diable that one? No way.
And of course the help doesn't work when you don't ha
Leandro Guimar??es Faria Corcete Dutra wrote:
> Please find at http://dutra.fastmail.fm/miss%C3%B5es1.odt a file that
> consistently crashes OOo.
As I already told "Jean-Michel", please file an issue upstream.
(www.openoffice.org, Get an account)
Anyway, this bug was about a ms-word stuff,
al only b/w
- draft
- draft only b/w
- high quali
- high quali only b/w
- photo
Grüße/Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
Update of /cvs/debian-openoffice/openoffice.debian.net
In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv18832
Modified Files:
index.wml news_latest.wmi patches.wml
Log Message:
update
Index: patches.wml
===
RCS file: /cvs/debian-openoffice/o
Update of /cvs/debian-openoffice/openoffice.debian.net
In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv14150
Modified Files:
index.wml
Log Message:
remove the 'working on 2.0 in experimental' stuff
Index: index.wml
===
RCS file: /cvs/debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tag 335262 + confirmed
retitle 335262 Crashes on startup with CJK languages
thanks
Hi,
Kanru Chen wrote:
> openoffice.org crashes on startup.
>
> $ /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 224: 12339 Segmentati
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove the following from unstable/experimental since they are
now obsolete:
- openoffice.org2 (everything)
- neon0.23 (everything)
- openoffice.org-help-*
- openoffice.org-debian-files
and (but they maybe will be rene'd anyway..):
- openoffice.or
reassign 335725 openoffice.org
severity 335725 wishlist
merge 335725 329585
thanks
Hi,
Matej Cepl wrote:
> Just downloaded openoffice.org 2.0 from
> http://people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org/2.x/ (which is
> currently in NEW front) and it is missing help.
It isn't in NEW anymore :)
Yes, it'
# that probably would make lesser people notice that but the 1.1.x help
# will probably get soon removed from the ftpmasters anyway, so..
reassign 335793 openoffice.org
severity 335793 wishlist
merge 335793 335735
thanks
Hi,
Jason Maas wrote:
> Thanks so much for your quick work packaging the fin
tag 335188 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
rich lott wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org
> Version: 1.1.4-7
> Severity: normal
>
>
> I get
>
> > The files required could not be found.
> > Please start the OpenOffice.org Setup and choose 'Repair'.
>
> in a message box when choosing AutoPilot Form from a d
Hi,
Jerome Warnier wrote:
> I sent you this updated oooprelink for OOo 2.0 but did not have any
> answer and just noticed that OOo 2.0 in Unstable does not yet provide
> such a script.
> Is it completely unuseful or what?
Haven't looked yet, but I considered and still consider other stuff more
im
reassign 294105 openoffice.org
reassign 335914 openoffice.org
retitle 294105 openoffice.org-bin: why OOo depends on libstlport ?
tag 294105 - fixed-upstream
severity 335914 wishlist
merge 335914 294105
thanks
Hi,
Benoît Dejean wrote:
> OOo seems to be the only software in Debian to depends on thi
Hi,
Matej Cepl wrote:
> I have ripped off help/ directory from the upstream RPM files and
> replaced with it /usr/lib/openoffice/help. It seems to work (not
> much testing, but three attempts to get help all ended in the
> right place). It is totally Works For Me(TM), but if anybody is
> inter
Hi,
Blars Blarson wrote:
> openoffice.org failed to build on a sparc buildd due to an unavailable
> build depency.
it did? how? (FWIW, the buildd pages still say "Building"..)
> The build on my sparc pbuilder is using no cpu time and has not changed
> the log file in almost 8 hours. The end of
Hi,
Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2005 14:20 schrieb John McMonagle:
> Running sarge on our ltsp servers and looking into what it will take to
> get openoffice.org2 installed.
> I'm assuming at this point I'll need to build packages.
Or wait for a backport...
> Assume I'll need to pull gcc4 as needed f
retitle 336528 opening links from OOo under KDE freezes OOo
tag 336528 + confirmed
thanks
Hi,
Grégoire Druant wrote:
> There is a bug in the registering function of openoffice : I use
> openoffice-kde package and when I click on help -> register, the help
> menu stays on top and konqueror start b
reassign 336557 openoffice.org
severity 336557 grave
merge 336557 335262
thanks
Hi,
Jue Kong wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org2
> Severity: normal
>
> every program in openoffice crash when locale set to none en_US. tested on
> machine set to zh_CN.GBK.
really? the openoffice.org2 packages from
[ quoting more than necessary for the buglogs sake. If you reply to bugs,
please do that to [EMAIL PROTECTED], so it gets archived in the buglog.
That is then also send to -openoffice because -openoffice is the
Maintainer: ]
Am Sonntag, 30. Oktober 2005 14:56 schrieb Marc F. Clemente:
> I was a
tag 336633 + unreproducible
tag 336633 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org
> Version: 2.0.0-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
I can't reproduce that. In any way. It works fine here (except the known
crash with CJK locales but this is
Hi,
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> I can't say anything about whether it is fixed on powerpc since my
> iBook's hard drive died some months ago. So please go ahead and close
> it for this version if you observe it's fixed on your G4.
This bug was even fixed before since it wasn't a OOo bug but a
gnom
Hi,
Wladimir Mutel wrote:
> After some cross-breeding with Ubuntu Breezy, I have got 'python'
> package of version 2.4.*, which forbids installation of python-uno from
Mixing different distributions never is good. As we see. That even is
more true here then even true for mixing stable and someth
hi,
Mathieu Lutfy wrote:
> I didn't see the package listed in the NEW queue, so I was
> wondering whether there was a problem with the packages under
> powerpc?
They failed to build on the buildds due some build env differences and
the ooo-build build system being overly clever :)
> I've been u
Bruce LaZerte wrote:
> OO 1.1.4, Debian testing, still not doing lanscape rotation on COM10
> envelope page sizes. Adjusting the pagesize a bit higher to 4.3", as
> suggested here by Slatterwhite, still works though.
And OOo 2.0.0-1?
Regards,
Rene
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Johannes Graumann wrote:
> I just came back from prowling the web for the answer to the question on how
> to best get openoffice running on my swanky new dual amd64 debian unstable
> box ... and fail to see the situation clearly.
The situation is: use a chroot with the 32-bit stuff. The nativ
reassign 337147 openoffice.org-common
retitle 337147 bash completion does not work because old 1.1.x info file still
around
thanks
Hi,
Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-debian-files
> Version: 1.1.4-6+1
^
> Severity: wishlist
openoffice.org-debian-files is obs
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 3. November 2005 01:05 schrieb Pedro Zorzenon Neto:
> Is there any apt-get URL for openoffice 2 .deb for Sarge?
Not yet.
> If not, do you plan to backport openoffice 2 packages for sarge?
Yes.
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tag 336655 + confirmed
thanks
Hi,
Matej Cepl wrote:
> (com.sun.star.uno.RuntimeException){{ Message = "python object
> raised an unknown exception ('No module named uno',traceback
> follows\XOOOa", Context = (com.sun.star.uno.XInterface)
> 0x0}}
>
>
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > (com.sun.star.uno.RuntimeException){{ Message = "pythonloader:
> > couldn't find core element pythonloader.Loader", Context
> > = (com.sun.star.uno.XInterface) 0x0}}
> >
> > Any thoughts?
>
> No, but I just notic
Update of /cvs/debian-openoffice/openoffice.debian.net
In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv31520
Modified Files:
index.wml
Log Message:
2.0.0 is in sid...
Index: index.wml
===
RCS file: /cvs/debian-openoffice/openoffice.debian.n
Hi.
Jerome Warnier wrote:
> While trying to build on Sarge, I fixed already some problems I had, but
which? and with this version? In 2.0.0-2 I already did most of the sarge
backport stuff. If you used that one, which problems did you have?
> I get the following message, whatever I do:
> Unpacki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Jerome Warnier wrote:
> Please find here-attached a patch to debian/rules (from version 2.0.0-2)
> to fix some problems and even do some extra.
> It is pretty small and quickly read/checked so please get back to me if
> any problem.
a) system-icu
Hi,
Jerome Warnier wrote:
> > b) you remove ENABLE_HUNSPELL? Why? And you really want to use internal
> > hunspell to not have to backport other packages than OOo. You just need
> > to add the hunspell package to ooo-build/src. What I incidentially
> > forgot in 2.0.0-2 so it doesn't appear in the
Hi,
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> > Which is broken, too. Are we Ubuntu? no. we are Debian so the sarge
> > clause has to be in the Debian clause otherwise it has no effect because
> > on Debian the Debian clause will be used. Always.
> No, look carefully, I put it in the else clause of the 'ifeq "$(DIS
Hi,
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> [..]
>
> Another thing: in debian/control(.in), the package build-depends on some
> packages of libraries from Xorg (which is obviously not in Sarge), like
> libxinerama-dev and libxkbfile-dev.
> So, shouldn't the "libxinerama-dev, libxkbfile-dev" read instead
> "libxi
Update of /cvs/debian-openoffice/openoffice.debian.net
In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv16937
Modified Files:
index.wml
Log Message:
Unstable, not Untable, thanks Jerome
Index: index.wml
===
RCS file: /cvs/debian-openoffice/o
reassign 337853 openoffice.org
tag 337853 + moreinfo
severity 337853 important
thanks
Am Sonntag, 6. November 2005 22:59 schrieb Paulo Jorge Jesus Silva:
> Package: openoffice.org-common
> Version: 2.0.0-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Uh, you talk about that the bin
Hi,
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Try to open any .doc file. It shows up the template list in which
> microsoft word is not listed. Also if you say new file there is no
> writer in that list
Besides the fact that I don't recall it not working last I used 1.1.x,
can you please try with 2.0.0 from sid?
Hi,
Dan Jacobson wrote:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> openoffice.org-bin: Depends: openoffice.org (> 1.1.3+1.1.4) but it is not
> going to be installed
> E: Broken packages
openoffice.org-bin is dead. Will be removed once the frpmasters do
that...
> Now I am without a wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> When I save onto a shfs filesystem, oowriter will merrily "save" it, but
> in reality leave a file of length 1 without complaining. This looks very
> similar to problems with ooo 1.x where ooo was at least complaining that
Hi,
the sarge backport of OOo 2.0.0-2 is done and will be available on
backports.org when the archive setup is coplete there. For now, you can
get it from www.backports.org/pending (see http://www.backports.org).
You can use it in sources.list like
deb http://www.backports.org/pending ./
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> the sarge backport of OOo 2.0.0-2 is done and will be available on
> backports.org when the archive setup is coplete there. For now, you can
> get it from www.backports.org/pending (see http://www.backports.org).
>
> You can use it in sources.list like
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > the sarge backport of OOo 2.0.0-2 is done and will be available on
> > backports.org when the archive setup is coplete there. For now, you can
> > get it from www.backports.org/pending (see http://www.backports
Hi,
Drew Parsons wrote:
> I've defined the default document language in Options: Language
> Settings->Languages to English (Australian). Likewise, I've selected the
> dictionary in Language Settings->Writing Aids->Myspell Spellchecker (Edit)
> to English (UK). But this spellcheck dictionary sett
Update of /cvs/debian-openoffice/openoffice.debian.net
In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv27802
Modified Files:
news_latest.wmi patches.wml
Log Message:
update
Index: news_latest.wmi
===
RCS file: /cvs/debian-openoffice/openoff
tag 339439 + moreinfo
tag 339439 + unreproducible
severity 339439 important
thanks
Hi,
Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> > when an image is inserted in a presentation from a file, the image
> > colors are wrongly rendered during a fullscreen slide show. The color
> > rendering is correct in the windowe
Jos? Rodrigo Sanjurjo Amado wrote:
> Hi,
> I have problems to install openoffice.org-writer 2.0.0-2 as it has
> said in bug#341056. How I can resolve it?
Either install libwpd8c2 from snapshot.debian.net, or simply wait for
2.0.0-3. Which already was uploaded but needs manual approval...
Hi,
Ralph Katz wrote:
> Using aptitude, selecting openoffice.org for installation and verifying
> that the bpo files were selected, these packages appeared broken and
> prevented OOo installation:
>
> Some dependencies of gij-4.0 are not satisfied:
> * gij-4.0 depends on libc6 (>= 2.3.5-1)
> Som
Hi,
Jerome Warnier wrote:
> The splash image is not customized for Debian. I thought it had to with
> the new build system.
> Is it meant to be like this?
It actually is ;-). Compare the progress bars between the and OOo
versions (provided that you accepted the sofficerc changes or installed
from
Hi,
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> > > For this purpose, I propose to add a Replaces: openoffice.org-gtk-gnome
> > > (<<2.0.0).
> >
> > It does.
> >
> > $ apt-cache show openoffice.org-gnome | grep gtk-gnome
> > Replaces: openoffice.org-gtk-gnome, openoffice.org2-gnome
> > Provides: openoffice.org-gtk-
Hi,
Jerome Warnier wrote:
> Just to let you know that PyUNO in backport of OOo2 to Sarge does not
> work.
I know. Because it is based on 2.0.0-2.
> It didn't work either in 2.0.0-2 in Sid, and now works with 2.0.0-3.
Exactly. Because 2.0.0-3 explicitely fixed that. The next backport
will have t
Hi,
Brian J Densmore wrote:
> This bug needs to be fixed. I can understand the desire to not include
> the Mozilla binary tree,
> however, that does not mean that the two integration libraries should be
> removed. It may
They are tightly coupled. The mozilla ab stuff needs a patched mozilla
and
tag 340468 + confirmed
retitle 340368 creating tables fail with "libhsqldb2: file not found" when
using gij
thanks
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I cannot create tables in a new, empty database file.
>
> Create a new Base document named Employees using HSQLDB (with only default
> options). Then
101 - 200 of 13563 matches
Mail list logo
