severity 195926 wishlist
merge 195926 192285
tag 195926 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Luke Q wrote:
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 13:05, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hmm...
Maybe we should mention that in README.Debian?
Anyhow, I'look if I can reproduce it..
Do you have RenderAccel in X's configuration
Hi folks,
OK, I'll be on Half-VAC till some time on Saturday (local
CS Students conference).
After that (at the weekend) I'll commit a beautified
(thanks Agustin and Chris :) ) version of the myspell stuff
(script is renamed to update-openoffice-dicts btw) and then upload
0.10.1[1] if noone
Hi folks,
OK, I'll be on Half-VAC till some time on Saturday (local
eek, that's Sunday. I got confused.
After that (at the weekend) I'll commit a beautified
(thanks Agustin and Chris :) ) version of the myspell stuff
(script is renamed to update-openoffice-dicts btw) and then
Hi Adrian,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
After looking at solenv/inc/unxlngi4.mk and solenv/inc/unxlngppc4.mk
it seems you compile OO on powerpc with -O2 but on i386 only with
-O1?
I've seen that too...
I tried to compile the 1.0.3-2 with gcc 3.2.3 and the patch below.
It compiled fine and OO starts
Hi Matthias,
Matthias Klose wrote:
as I wrote on Fri, 23 May 2003 10:39:48 +0200, I am unable to
reproduce this report. Is somebody else able to confirm this report?
I unfortunately rm'ed the patches I used for 1.0.3 to get it
built to this point with g++ 3.3 from my disk since we a) were
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ please learn right quoting, thanks. ]
Hi,
Joan Tur wrote:
An error occurred while copying the file mytexts.bau to
/home/quini/.openoffice/1.0.2/user/autotext
an error occurred while copying a file
ExitCode: 0
http://bugs.debian.org/150714
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adrian,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
what's the status of OO 1.0.3-3 (or 1.0.3.1-1)?
1.0.3-2 would have been 1.0.3.1-1, so when, then 1.0.3.1-2 :-)
Could you upload a new OO package with all the fixes that are already in
the BTS to unstable?
We don't
Hi,
Paul Gotch wrote:
I have experienced repeated crashes of X during scrolling of documents in
openoffice.org. I have seen this mostly with documents created with Word
XP.
I am using version 4.2.1-6 of the XFree packages (this is testing) and I am
using the mga server with a G400 running
Hi,
Michael Weber wrote:
there is a dependency in openoffice that requires libfreetype 2.1.0.
I have an upgraded woody (new xfree, new kde) running and have
libfreetype 2.3.1, so the package is not installable w/o manual intervention
and --force-depends.
Since OO1.1 is running perfectly
Hi,
we need the following build-deps installed on vore (unstable chroot):
(supplied in apt-friendly form :-) )
libcrimson-java libpng12-dev libxalan-java libxalan2-java xvfb
Thanks in advance,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org |
Hi,
juan wrote:
A full name is better...
don't u think OO 1.1rc is stable enought to be packaged ?
best regards,
We do. We are working on them for upload to unstable..
(as you may have seen from our much CVS commits in the last days).
Some problems need to ironed out, though before we
Hi Jan,
Jan Schulz wrote:
Only thing:
|The following packages have unmet dependencies:
| openoffice.org: Conflicts: oooqs-kde (= 1.0rc3-2) but 1.0rc3-2 is
| to be installed
I just checked: Its the only version in unstable (and in incoming) :(
Will there be a new version
Hi again,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Jan Schulz wrote:
Only thing:
|The following packages have unmet dependencies:
| openoffice.org: Conflicts: oooqs-kde (= 1.0rc3-2) but 1.0rc3-2 is
| to be installed
I just checked: Its the only version in unstable (and in incoming
Hi,
Jan Schulz wrote:
* Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oooqs-kde has a file conflict with the newer openoffice.org. Therefore
the conflicts:
Shit :( Can you tell me the file? I will then use a rebuild version,
which I will modify (if I'm able to...) QD...
/usr/share/icons
Hi Jerome,
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Chris, you told me about a mailing-list from upstream which lists all
changes they apply to OOo.
Could you point me to where to subscribe?
What do you mean?
All changes to CVS?
allcvs@openoffice.org
subscribe with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beware; it has MUCH
Hi,
Jan Schulz wrote:
* Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shit :( Can you tell me the file? I will then use a rebuild version,
which I will modify (if I'm able to...) QD...
/usr/share/icons/locolor/16x16/apps/ooo_global.xpm is now in
openoffice.org so it should be removed from
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
On Sid, using your unofficial mirror, I can see a Suggests: [...],
ttf-bitsream-vera which, obviously is missing a t.
I ignore if it has already been fixed in CVS, though.
it is.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' :
Hi,
Jan Schulz wrote:
* Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
huh? why? there is no hicolor in 16x16 for ooo_global.xpm in
oooqs-kde..
At least letting remove it in rules after reading your suggestion
failed because rm could not find the file. That's a strong indication
Hi,
Jan Schulz wrote:
Does anyone knows how to get slrn to recognise mime postings?
use mutt? :)
* Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had to remove even more icons, because they were present in my
system. I final made a find ./debian/ -name *.xpm and removed all
found icons (all
tag 188877 + pending
thanks
Hi aj,
Anthony Towns wrote:
[...]
tags 188877 - pending
[...]
thanks
The definition of the pending tag has been changed to:
] pending
] A solution to this bug has been found and an upload will be
] made soon.
The
Hi Jerome,
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
I would like to help you, guys, and would like to take a closer look at
the Ximian patches.
Therefore, I'd like to know how to download the latest version you are
working on.
the orig.tar.gz is at
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
tar xfvz openoffice.org_1.0.99+1.1rc
.orig.tar.gz
*sigh*
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED
Rene Engelhard wrote:
[I am CC'ing debian-openoffice since that is our
coordination/development ist for Debaian]
Grr. I shouldn't write mails when not really awake... Nnow really
CC:'ing. Doing a more or less fullquote to let d-o be able
to know what we are talking about...
i have done
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-26
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: openoffice.org-dictionaries [*]
Version : 20030617
Upstream Author : David Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gianluca Turconi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Davide Prina
Hi Jim,
Jim Watson wrote:
Rene,
To make these files you need to build mozilla on sparc linux from source
version 1.0 only - later versions will not work.
yeah. I know, that was the first thing I've done :)
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
:
Hi,
Chris Halls wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 09:06:46PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
cvs co -r OPENOFFICE_ORG_1_1 oo-deb [1]
mv oo-deb/debian .
rm -rf oo-deb
[...]
[1] there IIRC used to be a flag where you can skip that oo-deb dir and
checkout directly into debian but cvs co
Hi,
Chris Halls wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 11:37:57AM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
[...]
Last time I saw a Knoppix running, OOo was only available in German on
it, with no mean to put another version cleanly because it was not using
the packaging system.
That surprises me - the
reassign 203380 openoffice.org
severity 203380 minor
merge 196039 203380
thanks
Hi,
J G Miller wrote:
Package: openoffice.org-debian-files
This problem is in the soffice script, so in openoffice.org
On starting up OpenOffice with the command oofice,
on a non SunOS platform, one sees the
Hi again,
J G Miller wrote:
This is due to a syntax error in
/opt/OpenOffice.org1.0.2/program/sopatchlevel.sh
where spaces are missing around the test for equality.
uh? what version are you running btw? This is 1.0.2 and it seems it was
installed from upstream's tar.gz...
Grüße/Regards,
tag 203638 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Benjamin Jacobs wrote:
$ apt-cache show openoffice.org1.1 | grep Suggests
Suggests: openoffice.org1.1-spellcheck, openoffice.org1.1-help, menu,
ooqstart-gnome | ooqstart-kde, unixodbc, cupsys-bsd, libsane,
ttf-bitsream-vera
^^
ttf-bitstream-vera
Hi,
I forgot that doing before, so forgive me sending this mail now and not
earlier... ;)
Packages MUST NOT use virtual package names (except privately, amongst
a cooperating group of packages) unless they have been agreed upon and
appear in this list.
OK, as the procedure describes, here I am
Hi,
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
How is this possible?
Is there some kind of magic in the patch program OOo uses?
man patch:
-pnum or --strip=num
Strip the smallest prefix containing num leading slashes from each
file name found in the patch file. A sequence of one or more
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.6.0
Severity: wishlist
virtual-package-list.txt.gz says:
1. Post to debian-devel saying what names you intend to use or what
other changes you wish to make, and file a wish list bug against the
package debian-policy.
Here it is :)
[ sorry for the
Hi,
[ changing the subject... ]
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Ah?
And why
http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2003/debian-openoffice-200307/msg00171.html,
then?
Because of exactly the reason I wrote already. :P
Chris writes in that message:
---
Hi,
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Oh no! Me, again ;-)
:)
checking for gcc... gcc-3.2
checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler
cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
make: *** [debian/stampdir/configure] Error 77
Honestly, I don't understand
Hi,
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Do some of you know who (really knowledgable, like a Ximian developper)
to contact to talk about the Ximian patches?
I don't even know if a mailing-list exists.
Michael Meeks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux
Hi,
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Do you think it is possible to make a Sid chroot under Woody to build
OOo?
sure.
install build-essential + the b-d in it; mount /proc into the chroot
and you are fine...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' :
Hi,
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
It fails miserably like this if not present:
--
Making: ../../unxlngi4.pro/obj/security.obj
ccache gcc-3.0 -fmessage-length=0 -c -I. -I. -I../inc -I../../inc
-I../../unx/inc -I../../unxlngi4.pro/inc -I.
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Build-Depends: [..] libpam9g-dev | libpam-dev is there
^0 of course
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
1. What is the de facto standart spellchecker package now? What package
eh? how do you mean that?
source should I look into? What name shall I choose?
(openoffice.org-spellcheck-lv or myspell-lv)
myspell-lv.
The exact requirements sre described in the Debian Spelling Dictionaries and
Package: ftp.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-30
Severity: normal
Whith the ACCEPT of OpenOffice.org 1.1rc into _unstable_,
openoffice.org1.1 in experimental is now obsolete.
Please remove the packages...
Thanks in advance,
René
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Is the new myspell-* infrastructure ready for me to package the french
version?
Yes.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID:
cvs login
emtpy password
cvs co myspell-debian-template
[2] [EMAIL PROTECTED] respectively [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
Package: openoffice.org-spellcheck-es
Version: 0.0.2002.01.20-2
Severity: grave
Justificaction: renders package unusable
Hi Agustin,
openoffice.org-spellcheck-es is now uninstallable in sid due to
conflicts from openoffice.org_1.0.99+1.1rc-1 to it.
Please move the package to the new policy.
Hi,
[ mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] do NOT reach the bug submitter... ]
EspeonEefi wrote:
I believe the Gnome menu items have been moved to the package
openoffice.org-gnome. What I wonder is why openoffice.org recommends
Right.
openoffice.org-mimelnk, which seems to be integration with KDE,
Package: magyarispell
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-18
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
This patch converts myhungarian to the new myspell policy
(it is then myspell-hu) and makes it actually useful because
is is then actually usable to OpenOffice.org.
Please apply.
(please use patch
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+igerman98 (20030222-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Rene Engelhard
+* add myspell-de-{at,ch,de}
+* add myself to Uploaders:
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 7 Aug 2003 22:18:29 +0200
+
igerman98 (20030222-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version.
diff
Package: bgoffice
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-14
Severity: serious
Hi,
This patch converts myhungarian to the new myspell policy
(it is then myspell-bg) and makes it following the policy and
therefore actually useful because is is then actually usable to
OpenOffice.org without manual
Hi Sven,
Sven Luther wrote:
I am trying to build openoffice on my ppc box, but this fails because of
some missing ../mozlibs.
Is there some documentation about how to build openoffice or something
such, apart from the official debian stuff naturally.
less debian/README.
1.1rc will build
retitle 206238 1.1rc not available for powerpc - openoffice.org uninstallable
tag 206238 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Alan Pater wrote:
Package: openoffice.org-bin
Version: 1.0.3-1
you mean -2?
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable
This is not a bug... (well, not in
Hi,
Alan Pater wrote:
Then why does it appear in the list of a
because openofffice.org is available for all archs, it is an arch
any package.
-bin, -gnome and -crashrep have to be compiled for each arch, so they
are not available for powepc and openoffice.org depends on -bin.
It is right that
Rene Engelhard wrote:
because openofffice.org is available for all archs, it is an arch
any package.
eh, I meant Arch: all...
Regards,
Rene
Hi again,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
myspell-lv.
The exact requirements sre described in the Debian Spelling Dictionaries and
Tools
Policy (http://dict-common.alioth.debian.org).
Alrhough there is a cersion in the pipe making some important additions wrt
the OpenOffice.org woody backport, so
FYI
- Forwarded message from Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
From: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#205748 acknowledged by developer
(Bug#205748: fixed)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Aug
tag 206009 + pending
thanks
Hi Mark,
Mark Brown wrote:
The Debconf question about prelinking simply says that if you prelink
the program will start up faster without mentioning any downsides but
then defaults to No. This is a bit confusing - the assumption given
the description would be
tag 178820 + pending
thanks
Hi,
1.1rc3's mozzips are likned against libstdc++5 - pending.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`-
tag 206578 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
But OO help does not work. When I press any Help button or choose Help
from the menu, Help window opens and displays a single string:
The requested document does not exist in the database !!
yeah. the help fallback patch was
Hi,
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
I'm going to check within the next few days.
When do you expect to upload rc3 to Sid?
in the next days...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL
Hi,
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
First, during the upgrade, my old /etc/openoffice1.1 directory was not
deleted. I guess I have not made a --purge to delete it, but I'm
wondering if it would anyway.
Hmm. I wonder if we are _allowed_ to touch them. Strictly speaking are
they conffiles of other
Hi,
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
I know, but openoffice1.1 should then remove it when uninstalled for a
future version. Which is a problem, because it does not for the moment,
and we are not uploading a new version just therefore...
Exactly..
It even is now removed from experimental...
tag 206607 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Joost Kooij wrote:
Openoffice.org does not supply an application/rtf entry for
/etc/mailcap, even though it is perfectly capable of opening
rtf data.
Added in CVS, will be in the next packages.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian
tag 206711 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
Should be better to add a version = 2.54 for autoconf to Build-Depends.
Commited to CVS. Will be in rc3-1.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org |
Hi,
Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 09:54:02PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Yet another problem. The log is attached.
It seems it tries to use the internal Mozilla libs but they are build
with gcc 3.2 or 3.3 (libstdc++5) while Woody is using 3.0 (libstdc++3).
What arch are
Hi,
[ could you please wrap your lines after 72 chars. thanks - rewrapped
ah, and you could you please add your full name in the appropriate
field in your mailer? And why are you sending your mail two times? ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1/ The spell checker in spite of installing MySpell as
tag 206936 + moreinfo
tag 206936 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
[ please wrap your lines after 72 chars. I have to wrap them
here manually. This is intended to both of you... ]
Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
I don't uderstand shell scripts, but the postinst of
uh? A DD not understanding shell scripts?
Hi Aigars,
Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
I know, this is where I took the commands from, which is the most
strangest thing here. It seems, that in some environment, this check
fails:
(/var/lib/dpkg/info/openoffice.org-debian-files.postinst)
if [ $1 = configure ] dpkg -l openoffice.org | grep ii
Hi Michel,
Michel Grentzinger wrote:
Please find the attached fr.po file, which is the french translation of
the debconf templates. This file has been reviewed by the contributors
of the debian-l10n-french mailing-list.
This unfortunately is outdated now...
Could you add this file to the
Hi Michel,
Michel Grentzinger wrote:
Would you be so nice and retranslate with
http://cvs.debian.org/oo-deb/debian/openoffice.org-bin.templates.master?rev
=1.4cvsroot=debian-openofficecontent-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup?
Could you remplace Should I prelink? with Should OpenOffice.org be
Hi,
severity 207647 wishlist
thanks
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
I think this package should be renamed into openoffice.org-desktopfiles. The
description states that the files are only for Gnome, but obviously the
You have seen that there are msgbox-gnome and getstyle-gnome which are
linked
Hi,
Debian Installer wrote:
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
openoffice.org-help-en_1.1+20030814-1_all.deb: package says section is
contrib/doc, override says contrib/editors.
we think -help is better suited in
Hi,
kmuto wrote:
I translated debconf templates message into Japanese (ja.po).
Please apply this.
Unfortunately, the templates being in 1.1rc are not the up to date
ones anymore..
Would you be so nice and retranslate with the ones being in 1.1rc3-1 or
the POTFILES.in being at
tag 207714 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Kenshi Muto wrote:
At Fri, 29 Aug 2003 23:20:22 +0200,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Would you be so nice and retranslate with the ones being in 1.1rc3-1 or
the POTFILES.in being at
http://cvs.debian.org/oo-deb/debian/po/POTFILES.in?cvsroot=debian-openoffice
Hi Martin,
Martin Kretzschmar wrote:
sorry folks, the patch is broken (more specifically the clean rule is broken,
in its current form it will destroy your source tree unless you have already
run
build.prepare.icons). Rene noticed this bug.
you were right wrt probably occurig failures while
Hi,
Martin Kretzschmar wrote:
/Debian/Pakete/OpenOffice.org/Hauptpakete/openoffice.org-1.0.99+1.1rc3/res;
]
Successfully generated ImageList
/home/rene/Debian/Pakete/OpenOffice.org/Hauptpa
kete/openoffice.org-1.0.99+1.1rc3/offmgr/unxlngi4.pro/res/37/lchoff37.bmp
Abbruch (core
Hi,
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Upgrading from a 1.1rc-1 coming from one of the unofficial mirrors...
Setting up openoffice.org (1.0.99+1.1rc3-1) ...
Updating OpenOffice.org's dictionary list... done.
Creating symlink...
ln: `ooo/dicts': File exists
WTF?
WTF? does it want to do there?
if [
close 206241
thanks
Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
The rc3 that just came out closes this bug; that file now loads fine
in ooweb.
Thanks.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `'
tag 208024 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Damir R. Islamov wrote:
setup segmentation fault during upgrading user configuration.
This is not #171623: LANG=C. May be this is #191097, but
all necessary fonts are installed.
191097 is not about particular fonts. If there is _some_ broken font
_somewhere_
tag 208044 + unreproducible
tag 208044 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi
Alexander Brill wrote:
In the postinstall this package tries to create a symlink, but it doesn't
check if the symlink is already in place. So when you try to upgrade the
Do you have actually checked the postinst?
if [ $1 = configure
Hi,
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
- still needs to be real root user to build at some time (fakeroot is
not enough, for whatever reason)
fakeroot in woody is buggy...
- the clean target of debian/rules does not do a really good job, as a
result, dpkg-source is giving a lot of error messages (I
tag 208024 - moreinfo
tag 208024 - sid
merge 191097 202386 208024
thanks
Hi,
[ please always Cc the [EMAIL PROTECTED] to let the msg be recorded. Doing a
(more or less) fullquote for the BTS' sake.
Merging the bugs ]
Damir R. Islamov wrote:
Ok.
# export LANG=C
# cd
Hi,
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
[...]
PLEASE, PLEASE send unified diff. I *hate* this format...
RCS file: /cvs/debian-openoffice/oo-deb/debian/rules,v
retrieving revision 1.121
diff -r1.121 rules
93c93
ifeq $_CC gcc-3.0
ifeq $(_CC) gcc-3.0
already done.
96c96,97
export
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- // building is still not possible, yet could be really useful (can I
do something to help with this? Can I try and tell where it breaks?)
Hah. I had to see your // symbol so many times until I realized that it
means parallel. I'm sure that the
Hi Jerome,
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
It seems app-compatible.diff makes OOo use anyway the Microsoft
formats by default.
I thought you'd have to put the COMPATIBLE environment variable to
true or 1 to make it behave like this. It seems it is not even
thought that too. This is why the entry in
Hi,
Jc wrote:
Package: openoffice.org-bin
Version: 1.0.99+1.1rc3-1
Followup-For: Bug #207957
the fast fix is to set aspect in tools/options/OpenOffice.org/Display to
about 130% ...
That does enlarge the fonts on GNOME, though, doesn't it?
Then we may have too big fonts on GNOME, which
Hi,
Chris Halls wrote:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 07:23:55PM +0200, Martin Kretzschmar wrote:
Am Mo, 2003-09-01 um 13.22 schrieb Jérôme Warnier:
setenv UGLY_HACK_INDEED /LD_LIBRARY_PATH; \
unsetenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH; \
gcc-3.0 `pkg-config --cflags gtk+-2.0` `pkg-config
Hi,
Chris Halls wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 11:23:10AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
or add -Xfoo -Xbar to dh_install depending what MOZILLA is set to...
That ends up with you having to list all those files in two places, once in
rules and once in .install.
Not really since -X doesn't
Hi,
[ please always CC: the bug# ]
jc wrote:
On Wednesday 03 September, 2003 ??? 12:49:32AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
That does enlarge the fonts on GNOME, though, doesn't it?
Then we may have too big fonts on GNOME, which is the problem the
other way round ;)
no i use
Hi,
Retitling package name. Still waiting for openoffice.org to have
support for it, but will be uploaded as soon as mozilla-spellchecker
huh? What the fuck? What do you mean with that?
The openoffice.org packages has support for myspell-* now?
Or do you mean upstream support for Galician?
tag 208733 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Erwan David wrote:
When using LC_CTYPE as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (but only this mlocale setting)
menus are translated in french and partly in german. This menus
You mean Wörter zählen, right?
should be in english.
I agree.
The Wörter zählen feature is a patch by
merge 208841 207109
tag 208841 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Michel Grentzinger wrote:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hmm. Why a new bug instead of following-up to your old bug?
Please find the attached fr.po file, which is the french translation of
the
reassign 206238 openoffice.org
severity 209183 serious
merge 206238 209183
thanks
Hi,
Brian O'Reilly wrote:
attempted installation of the openoffice.org package from the powerpc
package pool fails due to dependency issues:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
openoffice.org:
reassign 209210 openoffice.org
severity 180973 minor
merge 180973 209210
thanks
Hi,
Alberto Caso wrote:
Package: openoffice.org-l10n-es
This is a common problem of all langpacks and it was reported a loong
time ago already (cf. 180973) and is mentioned in README.Debian,
too...
--- snip ---
severity 210315 wishlist
thanks
Hi,
Jerry Quinn wrote:
I'd consider this a wishlist, except I spent half an a hour trying to
me too.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL
Hi,
Romain Chantereau wrote:
I wonder know why the rc3 binaries are not available for powerPC.
http://bugs.debian.org/206238
I try to compile it by myself, and after fixing the mozilla zip
distribution, I encountered the java compilation problem. Here I gave
up.
Which Java compilation
Hi,
[ could you PLEASE not produce fullquotes? - http://learn.to/quote ]
Kevin.Hendricks wrote:
Jan never responded to my post that somehow he is improperly linking in
the green threads libhpi.so into his executable somehow resulting the
the OUCH.
Did he find the offending libhpi.so and
Kevin.Hendricks wrote:
[ could you PLEASE not produce fullquotes? - http://learn.to/quote ]
[get real the entire message was short ... and I am trying to help]
Sure. There is and was no offense intended. I just wanted point to it...
The same is with Cc'ing me extra, I read
Hi again,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Simply use the Blackdown JDK provided on the YDL mirror in
the openoffice directory.
Hmm. This is ...02d-FCS...
Will try. Thanks...
This JDK works. It fails in ./configure later because xmkmf is missing
on bruckner, I'll poke debian-admin to install
severity 210204 minor
tag 210204 + pending
thanks
Hi.
Robert King wrote:
22,24d21
application/x-msword; openoffice '%s'; edit=openoffice '%s'; test=test
$DISPLAY != ; nametemplate=%s.doc; description=Microsoft Word
Document; priority=6
application/x-msexcel; openoffice '%s';
reassign 207957 openoffice.org
severity 207957 important
merge 207957 211143
thanks
Jan De Luyck wrote:
The fontsize of the menus and dialogs in Openoffice.Org is unusably
small - it's barely readable. I've uploaded a screenshot to
http://misc.kcore.org/temp/ooo-1.1.0-font.png.
Hi,
Arjan Franzen wrote:
When i installed the openoffice.org-bin package i only used
the Dutch language pack. When i tried to run one of the
openoffice binaries all crashed on startup (halfway the
progresbar on the splash screen)
When I reinstalled the Openoffice.org-bin package along
with
201 - 300 of 12409 matches
Mail list logo
