On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 12:58:19PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst writes:
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 05:16:43PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> >> Sure, but neither of those actually require us to support GBK or GB
> >> 18030 as a system locale, only as something that iconv() (or
Wouter Verhelst writes:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 05:16:43PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> Sure, but neither of those actually require us to support GBK or GB
>> 18030 as a system locale, only as something that iconv() (or whatever
>> browsers actually use, which is probably their own thing) ca
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 05:16:43PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 at 09:54:21 -0700, Anthony Fok wrote:
> > supposedly some older Chinese websites are still using "GBK" as
> > encoding, probably something like:
> >
> >
> >
> > which has less than 30,000 characters and th
3 matches
Mail list logo
