Source: debian-policy
Version: 4.5.0.0
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx2.4
Hi,
debian-policy fails to build with Sphinx 2.4, currently available in
experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory
Source: developers-reference
Version: 11.0.10
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx2.4
Hi,
developers-reference fails to build with Sphinx 2.4, currently available in
experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
On 03/06/18 at 20:15 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 04:55:01PM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > > I even dare to say there is no "devref maintainers" team at all, and
> > > that if you actually wish to work on it you should go ahead, add
> > > yourself to uploaders and do
Source: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.18
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
On 10/05/16 at 12:31 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that there are also Build-Depends-Arch/Build-Conflicts-Arch:
>
> from deb-src-control(5):
>
>Build-Depends-Arch: package-list
> Same as
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lucas pushed a change to branch master
in repository developers-reference.
from 23da4a4 Uploads to suites other than unstable/experimental should
use codenames.
new e7121c8 Rebuild to fix issues with texlive
debian-keyring desc.
Update section on debview, now in the debian-el package.
Point Packages-arch-specific URL to cgit mirror.
Uploads to suites other than unstable/experimental should use codenames.
Lucas Nussbaum (1):
Rebuild to fix issues with texlive fonts caused by #796120
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lucas pushed a commit to branch master
in repository developers-reference.
commit e7121c83c876089d89f90247980d26c24913238f
Author: Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org
Date: Fri Aug 28 10:50:11 2015 +0200
Rebuild to fix issues
for Bug#761005
fix Bug#780243
fix Bug#768426
adjust codename and release number
fix Bug#738566
Jean-Paul Guillonneau (1):
Update French translation
Jonathan Wiltshire (1):
Soften retirement procedure w.r.t. notifying other developers
Lucas Nussbaum (1
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lucas pushed a change to branch master
in repository developers-reference.
from fdfd7d6 fix Bug#738566
new d73eeb2 Prepare changelog for upload.
The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lucas pushed a commit to branch master
in repository developers-reference.
commit d73eeb241ef9553240f500c379f1a41a7b118f98
Author: Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org
Date: Thu Jun 11 13:27:13 2015 +0200
Prepare changelog
Hi Hideki,
Actually, it would make more sens for you to commit your changes
directly, I think. I quickly skimmed through them and they all looked
good.
Thanks,
Lucas
On 28/05/15 at 21:47 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 14:12:48 +0200
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net
Hi,
On 26/05/15 at 20:39 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Hi,
Is there any plan to release updated developers-reference for
Jessie point release?
I would welcome a patch.
Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On 19/03/15 at 22:08 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
package: developers-reference
severity: wishlist
Hi,
How about borrowing css from debian reference?
It looks better than now, IMO.
see http://www.ma-aya.net/~henrich/temp/developers-reference/ for the image.
If no one would make
On 31/01/15 at 20:47 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 23/11/14 at 21:13 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
Was there a lot of failure ?
No
What severity did you use for the bug report ?
serious
So in practice
On 23/11/14 at 21:13 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 08:15:33PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 23/11/14 at 20:03 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 04:47:00PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Bill Allombert wrote
Source: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.6.0
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2014-11-11 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to
reopen 484805
thanks
On 31/08/14 at 10:20 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
Really? Has anyone talked to them?
I believe this was the last time BTS workflow was brought up on -ctte@:
https://lists.debian.org/20494.51776.384105.199...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lucas pushed a commit to branch master
in repository developers-reference.
commit a68e9e02c0b30d17562f9230240be8881247570f
Author: Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org
Date: Fri Aug 29 15:14:18 2014 -0700
Update changelog
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lucas pushed a change to branch master
in repository developers-reference.
from 12ea34b Mention collab-maint in the VCS section. Closes: #496815
new a68e9e0 Update changelog for release.
new e026e90
/D9jMNaKUwCxTDx8gCxwGY3H9MC5kRqWBpdalByv03i
lWcOcB6IsCo=
=B5HS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Lucas Nussbaum (12):
Drop section on goodies, point to wiki instead. Closes: #751489
Also close #586186, since DD certificates are mentioned on MemberBenefits.
dpkg-buildpackage now uses fakeroot
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lucas pushed a commit to branch master
in repository developers-reference.
commit bb9e357ebe47e335ce5b8cb513f97bc23385e5de
Author: Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org
Date: Sun Aug 24 14:41:01 2014 -0700
Mention getting
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lucas pushed a commit to branch master
in repository developers-reference.
commit 97f8e71c422c4951a94d4f10bfe2c0a3b026e078
Author: Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org
Date: Sun Aug 24 14:34:31 2014 -0700
Mention rationale
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lucas pushed a commit to branch master
in repository developers-reference.
commit 2c6496eca7625b640dfd5f5e3cb5aba1b83d0655
Author: Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org
Date: Sat Aug 23 18:50:42 2014 -0700
dpkg-buildpackage now
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lucas pushed a commit to branch master
in repository developers-reference.
commit 6b0fa757b587b64a7fcb9303e4dcbfcdda63b3cd
Author: Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org
Date: Sat Aug 23 18:52:28 2014 -0700
Drop section
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lucas pushed a commit to branch master
in repository developers-reference.
commit 8f2b1802ba79cc398b93894ac9b1568d4beafe40
Author: Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org
Date: Sat Aug 23 18:45:52 2014 -0700
Drop section
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lucas pushed a commit to branch master
in repository developers-reference.
commit 20ea8ac97f9556ff2f9198d393710f413184d4a8
Author: Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org
Date: Sat Aug 23 18:47:18 2014 -0700
Also close #586186
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lucas pushed a commit to branch master
in repository developers-reference.
commit ab70cbd93d770cd3d02ca794b73e2fb5232097e5
Author: Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org
Date: Sat Aug 23 18:56:23 2014 -0700
Mention other types
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lucas pushed a change to branch master
in repository developers-reference.
from de9303f Update links from http to https where possible
new 8f2b180 Drop section on goodies, point to wiki instead. Closes:
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lucas pushed a commit to branch master
in repository developers-reference.
commit d61cbdcbf867dc621fdc56c9d22675fc157e38fe
Author: Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org
Date: Wed Jul 30 17:11:29 2014 +0200
Fix typo in Vcs-Git
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lucas pushed a commit to branch master
in repository developers-reference.
commit 34cc15e683169e91dce01e84f42d74438f67babc
Author: Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org
Date: Wed Jul 30 17:18:59 2014 +0200
Update changelog. Add
/caOCebm94EVTC0eSySXubfNV5oCSH/y/V7rnxqsBGqu
MWZ00UPdv1E=
=76a7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Andreas Rönnquist (1):
Fix typo in NMU section s/blocking/block/
Charles Plessy (1):
Updated changelog.
Lucas Nussbaum (11):
Fix typo in Vcs-Git:. Closes: #756491
Update changelog. Add bugnumber
tags 742552 - patch
thanks
Hi,
On 24/03/14 at 19:08 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Maybe at this stage, the recommendation would be better placed in
developers-reference.
thanks, that's a good idea.
i've cloned the bug to suggest its inclusion in developers-reference,
where the
tags 680174 - patch
thanks
On 10/07/12 at 17:50 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 11:40:40AM +0200, Guus Sliepen a écrit :
Attached is a patch against the developers-reference source. It can
probably be improved, any comments are welcome.
Dear Guus,
thank you for
On 30/07/14 at 09:37 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
- - documenting in the previous Subversion repository that it moved (and
remove it to avoid contributions there).
Done.
Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
On 26/02/14 at 10:49 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Please remember to CC bug submitters when relevant since they are
usually not subscribed and I am definitely not.
I can see both sides of this but I don't really mind which patch gets
into devref, so, please choose a patch, add Debian
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.12
Severity: normal
Hi,
developers-reference should describe the expected workflow for modifications.
Following a discussion on the status of developers-reference, it seems
that the consensus on the way changes should be made is the following:
I think
On 03/07/14 at 11:27 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
TL;DR: skip to last paragraph
Hi,
Paul, thanks a lot for summarizing the discussion.
On 19/06/14 at 09:05 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Switch to a different documentation format that more people are able to
write, this probably too
TL;DR: skip to last paragraph
Hi,
Paul, thanks a lot for summarizing the discussion.
On 19/06/14 at 09:05 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Switch to a different documentation format that more people are able to
write, this probably too much work to be useful though.
I don't think this is
On 09/02/14 at 12:21 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 03:13:36PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
I question the whole notion of DPL delegation of policy powers to the policy
editors.
Can I suggest you start a GR about if you think the DPL is maing
decisions he can not
Hi,
Interesting thread.
On 23/05/13 at 13:34 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Do you have an opinion on how we should make these decisions as a project?
Is this a place where possibly we should seek the opinion of legal
counsel?
Our contact point at our legal counsel (SFLC) is Mishi Choudhary
On 10/05/12 at 17:31 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
Sending again as I forgot to CC the BTS
On Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:26:44, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 08/05/12 at 20:11 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.7
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
On 08/05/12 at 20:11 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.7
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
In a long email thread on [debian-devel] concerning a package which has a
maintainer that is temporarily MIA due to being time overloaded, the
discussion came to
Hi,
On 23/04/12 at 14:56 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
Greetings.
I would like your consideration as to whether to update Section 5.11.1 of the
Developer's Reference to incorporate some of the views of Stefano Zacchiroli
concerning When and how to do an NMU. [1]
For background as to why
On 23/04/12 at 17:24 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
Oops... sending again, as I forgot to CC: the developer's reference team.
On Monday, April 23, 2012 16:26:59, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
On 23/04/12 at 14:56 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
Greetings.
I would like your consideration
Source: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.7
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120331 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]:
tags 569219 - patch
thanks
On 25/02/10 at 11:23 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
We have several meta-packages and transitional packages in the archive,
some of
tags 582811 - patch
thanks
On 23/05/10 at 16:16 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
While updating the French translation of the Developer's Reference
(currently reviewed on debian-l10n-french@l.d.o), I noticed that
On 25/07/11 at 04:25 +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hello,
This bug came up for discussion this evening at DebConf; I think it's
overdue to be followed through on. Lucas seems to agree in the end with my
own believe that there is a weak consensus in favor of the proposed policy,
and it does
On 07/05/11 at 00:08 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 11:31:02PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I just sent a mail to -devel@ to gather more feedback about the change.
Let's see where that thread will be going then, thanks.
So, apparently, I'm a bit alone
On 06/05/11 at 20:59 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:44:47PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I think that if you want to change the NMU procedures described in
dev-ref, you should at least discuss the proposals in a similar forum
than the one where the current
On 03/05/11 at 15:38 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I agree that the resulting wording of patch is suboptimal, and that
recommending 0-day NMUs is not the way to go. We are rarely in need for
action in less than a couple of days in Debian, so the current policy
seems fine to me.
I'd like to add
On 03/05/11 at 22:27 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
[DEP1 drivers CCed].
Le Tue, May 03, 2011 at 01:25:49PM +0100, Neil McGovern a écrit :
Package: developers-reference
Tags: patch
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/03/msg00016.html
Index: pkgs.dbk
Hi,
As one of the (ex-)?dev-ref maintainers, I was also asked to comment by
Raphael.
Generally, I think that the patch goes in the right direction.
I'd like to suggest changes to the last paragraph, though:
Lack of attention to RC bugs is often interpreted by the QA team as a sign
that the
On 03/12/10 at 12:18 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:40:39 +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Index: resources.dbk
===
--- resources.dbk (Revision 7825)
+++ resources.dbk (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -753,12
On 21/09/09 at 18:44 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 09:56:37AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Following a discussion on debian-de...@l.d.o[1], the way the Developers
Reference[2] is maintained has been changed, with the aim to make it
more public and easier for people
l.source, l.version, u.version
from sources l, sources u
where l.source = u.source
and l.distribution = 'debian' and u.distribution = 'debian'
and l.release = 'lenny' and u.release = 'sid'
and l.version u.version;
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net
On 01/09/09 at 23:14 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 14:06:17 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:39:40AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 23:38:17 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
That's unfortunate. Imagine the following
+sarge1
9. sarge reaches end-of-life, and is no longer supported
10. Another security bug is found in P
11. A stable security upload is done for P: 1.0-1+etch2
At this point, S won't auto-upgrade to O 1.0-1+etch2 (since 1.0-1+etch2
1.0-1+sarge1). S will keep the vulnerable version of P.
--
| Lucas
On 19/08/08 at 17:19 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 03:17:44PM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 15/08/08 at 11:01 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
First, section 4.14 should list things that one does
On 15/08/08 at 16:35 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 15/08/08 at 11:01 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think the better way is do it similar to copyright: for common
patch/build system we should include only
could have a machine-parseable format to specify those, too.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 15/08/08 at 11:01 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
First, section 4.14 should list things that one does not need to
describe in debian/README.source. For example, the use of one of the
standard patch systems (quilt, dpatch
.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 27/01/08 at 23:00 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 07:31:02PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:31:32AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
In the ruby-extras team, we use:
Maintainer: the team member
On 28/01/08 at 14:00 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:55:25AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 27/01/08 at 23:00 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 07:31:02PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Bill Allombert wrote
: the team member mainly responsible for the package
Uploaders: the team mailing list, and the other team members who keep a
look on the package.
And I think that makes perfect sense ;)
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED
, or all mails signed
by a DD? I don't know how hard it would be to implement in mailman.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
it be a sequential build?
I think it should behave as is currently required then; that is to say,
make it a sequential build.
Agreed.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
to parse, this could
still be moved to debhelper.
Any arguments I missed?
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On 14/03/07 at 20:54 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Lucas Nussbaum:
Such a machine looks a bit strange (6 CPUs vs 256 MB RAM). I think that
usually, modern SMPs have enough memory to handle what all their CPUs
can do.
I'm not sure. 512 MB per execution unit is not too uncommen and may
On 08/03/07 at 11:50 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 06:08:52PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Bug #209008 proposed to have a common interface to tell packages to do
parallel building (make -j).
You can't set a generic value.
For example: A machine with 6 cpus but only
).
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/fosdem07-gridqa-slides.pdf
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2003/09/threads.html#00079
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On 07/03/07 at 19:32 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 06:08:52PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Bug #209008 proposed to have a common interface to tell packages to do
parallel building (make -j).
Not having this is a PITA for me, since I do
a copy of /dev/null) so that most
packages reading /dev/tty don't block during the test
I'll try to give a better estimation soon.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
signature.asc
Description
...
Checking available source versions...
Can't find source for qd_2.1.200-1
(only different version(s) 1.0.0-rc2-5 found)
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
, and for sbuild to use --source-only to get the
source package and not the binary package...
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On 14/01/07 at 14:28 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:45:18 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Some source packages generate binary packages using the same name as
another source package. For example, see the 'qd' source package,
and the 'qd' binary
don't like it at all (e.g sbuild), causing confusing
behaviour, based on the order of entries in Sources.gz, and confusion
for users.
It might be a good idea to forbid name conflicts, since some tools don't
consider that they are totally different namespaces.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED
80 matches
Mail list logo
