On 27-Jun-01, 07:09 (CDT), Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Agreed. So should we close this bug report?
>
Yes, please.
Steve
--
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 07:09:30PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 09:26:20AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> >
> > misconfigured, then that solves his problem. Does the general
> > suggestion retain much value, though?
>
> Personally I don't see why a root user should have a PA
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 09:26:20AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>
> misconfigured, then that solves his problem. Does the general
> suggestion retain much value, though?
Personally I don't see why a root user should have a PATH that does not
contain sbin and /usr/sbin.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 08:41:09AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:08:10AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> >>
> >> I'd really like to see the list expanded to include /sbin and /usr/sbin
> >> as well. My rationale is that init.d sc
On Mon, 25 June 2001 08:41:09 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > Please see the original proposal: the problem was precisely that there
> > were situations where these directories were not in the PATH and this
> > broke the scripts.
>
> Only because the user's system was misconfigured...
Let's go for /
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:08:10AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
>>
>> I'd really like to see the list expanded to include /sbin and /usr/sbin
>> as well. My rationale is that init.d scripts are intended (and mostly
> Please see the original proposal: th
On 23-Jun-01, 17:36 (CDT), Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:08:10AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > On 21-Jun-01, 17:33 (CDT), Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Scripts which use programs in a directory other than /usr/bin and
> > > /bin (and /u
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:08:10AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 21-Jun-01, 17:33 (CDT), Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Scripts which use programs in a directory other than /usr/bin and
> > /bin (and /usr/bin/X11?) should append that directory to the PATH
>
> I'd really like to
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd really like to see the list expanded to include /sbin and /usr/sbin
> as well. My rationale is that init.d scripts are intended (and mostly
> only useful) for the root user, and the the whole point of /sbin
> and /usr/sbin is to contain scripts usef
On 21-Jun-01, 17:33 (CDT), Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scripts which use programs in a directory other than /usr/bin and
> /bin (and /usr/bin/X11?) should append that directory to the PATH
I'd really like to see the list expanded to include /sbin and /usr/sbin
as well. My rationale
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 07:44:59AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Bug #36151: etc/init.d scripts should specify an explicit PATH
>
> > Summary: init.d scripts shouldn't depend on having PATH set in a
> > useful manner -- they should explicitly set the
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bug #36151: etc/init.d scripts should specify an explicit PATH
> Summary: init.d scripts shouldn't depend on having PATH set in a
> useful manner -- they should explicitly set the PATH. Not much
> discussion in the bug logs, and most of the flame^H^H^H
12 matches
Mail list logo
