OK, I'll read it and comment. If it's compatible with GPL, does the same
things that it does and is dfsg-free, then I do want it in.
-Jim
Hi Jim!
On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Jim Lynch wrote:
Hi :)
I have no objection to telling some fact to any maint...
The problem is that dh_make (and not debhelper - sorry JoeyH) creates
a sample file which
| refers to the Free Documentation License by the file name:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 01:09:33PM -0500, Susan G. Kleinmann wrote:
But is it really a common license? Perhaps dh_make's template manual page
should be corrected instead.
I understand and appreciate the desirability of keeping the base-files
package small. But I think we're all hoping
I just think that a license first needs to become common and then be added
to that directory, not the other way around.
OK, then I guess you should forward this report to debhelper.
Thanks,
Susan
Peter Palfrader wrote:
Why no? I'ld guess telling the debhelper maintainer about this issue is not
that of a bad idea.
Well to start with, debhelper != dh-make.
BTW, and FWIW, I do not belive the FDL is a DFSG complient license if
invarient sections are used. Besides invarient sections it has
On 14-Dec-00, 17:20 (CST), Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 01:09:33PM -0500, Susan G. Kleinmann wrote:
But I think we're all hoping that the FDL actually becomes common,
and putting it into the common-licenses directory is one step toward
making that happen.
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 02:29:53PM -0500, Susan G. Kleinmann wrote:
Package: base-files
Version: 2.2.4
Severity: Normal
The debhelper script dh_make inserts a sample manpage.sgml.ex file into
a new debian directory when a package is being built. This sample file
refers to the Free
But is it really a common license? Perhaps dh_make's template manual page
should be corrected instead.
I understand and appreciate the desirability of keeping the base-files
package small. But I think we're all hoping that the FDL actually becomes
common, and putting it into the
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 01:09:33PM -0500, Susan G. Kleinmann wrote:
But I think we're all hoping that the FDL actually becomes common,
and putting it into the common-licenses directory is one step toward
making that happen.
I would describe it more as putting the cart before the horse.
At
9 matches
Mail list logo
