> It it fails, I will format my internal IDE disk using Apple's Drive setup
(it now contains Debain, but I want to repartition it anyway), and try
booting from there.
I don't have a README or INSTALL file, so am I correct in the above steps to
take, or do I miss anything?
There's a bunch
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 04:02:36PM +0200, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
> Hi Chris and Sven,
>
> >>> I recently noted a post stating that the bootloader development team did
> >>> not
> >>> have access to an oldword powerpc. I have one of those, and can do some
> >>> testing this weekend, even if it rend
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 04:02:36PM +0200, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
> Hi Chris and Sven,
>
> >>> I recently noted a post stating that the bootloader development team did
> >>> not
> >>> have access to an oldword powerpc. I have one of those, and can do some
> >>> testing this weekend, even if it rend
Hi Chris and Sven,
>>> I recently noted a post stating that the bootloader development team did not
>>> have access to an oldword powerpc. I have one of those, and can do some
>>> testing this weekend, even if it renders my openfirmware settings obsolete.
>>> [...]
>>
>> It maybe too early, we ha
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 02:07:19PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 01:26:24PM +0200, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
> > Hi Sven,
> >
> > I recently noted a post stating that the bootloader development team did not
> > have access to an oldword powerpc. I have one of those, and can do so
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 01:26:24PM +0200, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> I recently noted a post stating that the bootloader development team did not
> have access to an oldword powerpc. I have one of those, and can do some
> testing this weekend, even if it renders my openfirmware settings
Hi Sven,
I recently noted a post stating that the bootloader development team did not
have access to an oldword powerpc. I have one of those, and can do some
testing this weekend, even if it renders my openfirmware settings obsolete.
I'm afraid I'm not an expert, but I got some real great help on
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:18:08PM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Oct 22 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> > The current miboot users simply seem to hand compress the toplevel
> > vmlinux kernel and that is it.
>
> Yes, that's exactly what I do for an oldworld here. BTW, did you (or was
> it Gaudenz) g
On Oct 22 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> The current miboot users simply seem to hand compress the toplevel
> vmlinux kernel and that is it.
Yes, that's exactly what I do for an oldworld here. BTW, did you (or was
it Gaudenz) get my .config file for the oldworld? Do you need
asssistance with generatio
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 04:58:08PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 07:36:57AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:45:47PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:31:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:10:21AM -0700,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 07:36:57AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:45:47PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:31:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:10:21AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200,
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:45:47PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:31:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:10:21AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > In order t
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:10:21AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > In order to continue work on making debian-installer subarch friendly, i
> > now launch a second round of investigation concerning the way different
> > su
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:31:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:10:21AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > In order to continue work on making debian-installer subarch friendly, i
> > > now
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In order to continue work on making debian-installer subarch friendly, i
> now launch a second round of investigation concerning the way different
> subarches boot. The situation as i understand it is :
[snip]
> prep: no id
Hubert Figuiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 09:13, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Ok thanks for this response, this clearly clarifies the situation for
> > oldpmac, altough i don't really think this will modify our strategy for
> > oldpmac : miboot or bootx for initial install,
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 09:13, Sven Luther wrote:
> Ok thanks for this response, this clearly clarifies the situation for
> oldpmac, altough i don't really think this will modify our strategy for
> oldpmac : miboot or bootx for initial install, quik for running systems
> and miboot for those not sup
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:41:18PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:02:17PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > > For apus there should be an Icon that directly calls
Brad Boyer wrote:
Newer OF versions supposedly
support ELF files directly, but I'm not sure when that was added,
or how well it works.
Far as I'm aware, only systems with OpenFirmware 3 and later (i.e.,
NewWorld systems) have an ELF loader package in their ROMs. Maybe
someone with an OF 2.x s
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:41:18PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:02:17PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > For apus there should be an Icon that directly calls it from the
> > > CD. Should be no different then t
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:02:17PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > For apus there should be an Icon that directly calls it from the
> > CD. Should be no different then the normal Amiga m68k.
> >
> > Same "freeness" problems too that allways got ign
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:02:17PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:31:15PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > In order to contin
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:31:15PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > In order to continue work on making debian-installer subarch friendly, i
> > > now launch a second rou
Brad Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:13:01AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ok thanks for this response, this clearly clarifies the situation for
> > oldpmac, altough i don't really think this will modify our strategy for
> > oldpmac : miboot or bootx for initial inst
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:13:01AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Ok thanks for this response, this clearly clarifies the situation for
> oldpmac, altough i don't really think this will modify our strategy for
> oldpmac : miboot or bootx for initial install, quik for running systems
> and miboot for t
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:31:15PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In order to continue work on making debian-installer subarch friendly, i
> > now launch a second round of investigation concerning the way different
> >
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 02:09:11PM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > oldpmac: uses bootx, miboot, quik or serial console OF. OF uses the
> > .coff kernel, don't know about initrd. miboot uses floopy for kernel
> > (compressed) and initrd. bo
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> oldpmac: uses bootx, miboot, quik or serial console OF. OF uses the
> .coff kernel, don't know about initrd. miboot uses floopy for kernel
> (compressed) and initrd. bootx can use a kernel and separate initrd, and
> quik cannot be used
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In order to continue work on making debian-installer subarch friendly, i
> now launch a second round of investigation concerning the way different
> subarches boot. The situation as i understand it is :
>
> newpmac: uses ya
Hello,
In order to continue work on making debian-installer subarch friendly, i
now launch a second round of investigation concerning the way different
subarches boot. The situation as i understand it is :
newpmac: uses yaboot (uncompressed kernel + separate initrd) or OF
(.coff kernel, don't kno
30 matches
Mail list logo
