Re: a try at dri [WOOT!]

2002-07-08 Thread Michael Furr
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 15:03, Michel Dänzer wrote: Look at /usr/share/doc/xserver-xfree86-dri-trunk/examples/XF86Config-4.radeon. That's what I had originally based my config file on. However, now when I just copied that into place, changed the keyboard to us, it works(even at 1280)! Thanks!

Re: a try at dri [WOOT!]

2002-07-08 Thread Toby Sargeant
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:38:57PM -0400, Michael Furr wrote: I'm not sure exactly what part of the file is different, the only thing I really noticed is that page flipping is enabled, but I don't think that would be it. I discovered (the very hard way) that fbset -x reports a dotclock

Re: a try at dri [WOOT!]

2002-07-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 23:27, Toby Sargeant wrote: On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:38:57PM -0400, Michael Furr wrote: I'm not sure exactly what part of the file is different, the only thing I really noticed is that page flipping is enabled, but I don't think that would be it. I discovered

Re: a try at dri [WOOT!]

2002-07-08 Thread Toby Sargeant
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:37:53AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: Hardly, the example XF86Config and all my XF86Configs show a similar discrepancy (79.815 vs. 79.816) but work fine. All I can say is that on this machine, (TiBook 800MHz, 1024x854) the difference *was* important. Toby. -- To

Re: a try at dri [WOOT!]

2002-07-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 23:55, Toby Sargeant wrote: On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:37:53AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: Hardly, the example XF86Config and all my XF86Configs show a similar discrepancy (79.815 vs. 79.816) but work fine. All I can say is that on this machine, (TiBook 800MHz,