Alan Macdougall wrote:
>
> On 17/6/01 at 1:45 AM, Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Typing "mozilla" at the command line seems to
> > > cause 5 separate processes to be started,
> > > taking in total 149Mb of memory (accorting to
> > > gtop). Given that I only have 64Mb of real RAM
Ethan Benson wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 09:18:21PM +1200, Alan Macdougall wrote:
Vital stats: Pwer Macintosh 7600/200MHz/64Mb running Woody.
Mozilla 0.9 seems a bit of a hog. (This is build 2001052403 downloaded
from Ethan's penguinppc repository.)
Typing "mozilla" at the command line s
> >You seem to be building a lot of stuff anyway, how about applying as
> >Debian maintainer so your work can go into the distribution proper?
> >
>
> Well, I've been thinking about it, but I don't have a clue where to
> begin, and I don't have gpg configured. I'll probably be meeting some
http
Michael Schmitz wrote:
galeon is in sid/non-US now. For i386 anyway, I'll probably build it on my
Pismo soon but I can't upload until my new key is signed and in the ring.
They'll also be there in a second, built from Robot101's official Galeon
packages:
http://hadess.net/debian/galeon/
Yo
Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That said, there are unofficial debs available from the galeon site, i think
>> i
>> remember, you could build those if you really needed to.
>
> they suck, those WILL pollute your clean debian install.
>
> a crappy .deb is far worse then a make ins
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 01:13:46PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > ./configure
> > make
> > su -c 'make install'
>
> And pollute my clean debian install, on way, ...
bullshit, read me message again, galeon installs cleanly into
/usr/local <- see the local part?
it will not interfere with the p
> > galeon is in sid/non-US now. For i386 anyway, I'll probably build it on my
> > Pismo soon but I can't upload until my new key is signed and in the ring.
>
>
> They'll also be there in a second, built from Robot101's official Galeon
> packages:
> http://hadess.net/debian/galeon/
You seem to be
On 19 Jun 2001 13:36:59 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Sven LUTHER wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:46:41PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 04:30:15PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But there is no galeon debian package, isn't it ? I know there are
> > >
Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> > > galeon is in sid/non-US now. For i386 anyway, I'll probably build it on
> > > my Pismo soon but I can't upload until my new key is signed and in the
> > > ring.
> >
> > Wasn't there yesterday ... or else i must be going blind.
>
> Yesterday is
Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > galeon is in sid/non-US now. For i386 anyway, I'll probably build it on my
> > Pismo soon but I can't upload until my new key is signed and in the ring.
>
> Wasn't there yesterday ... or else i must be going blind.
Yesterday is past, and I get sid directly from http.us.deb
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 01:36:59PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Sven LUTHER wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:46:41PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 04:30:15PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But there is no galeon debian package, isn't it ? I know ther
Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:46:41PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 04:30:15PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > >
> > > But there is no galeon debian package, isn't it ? I know there are
> > > unnofficial packages though, the galeon guys distribute them i
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 01:16:03PM +0200, Eric Deveaud wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:46:41PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 04:30:15PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> > > there should be a galeon package in non-US any tim
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:46:41PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 04:30:15PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > there should be a galeon package in non-US any time now that mozilla
> > is packaged. having said that you don't NEED a deb
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:46:41PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 04:30:15PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> >
> > But there is no galeon debian package, isn't it ? I know there are
> > unnofficial
> > packages though, the galeon guys distribute them i think, but no official
> >
> > But there is no galeon debian package, isn't it ? I know there are
> > unnofficial
> > packages though, the galeon guys distribute them i think, but no official
> > debian packages. skipstone is nice though. (Still eating 20MB though, if i
> > read top correctly, but then ram is cheap :)))
>
>
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 09:31:48AM -0600, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
> Thanks Ethan for the debs, they are a pretty significant improvement
> over 0.9.
>
> Only thing I've found that ticks me off, is I can't log into
> SourceForge. When I get to http://sourceforge.net/account/login.php
> and type my
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 04:30:15PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> But there is no galeon debian package, isn't it ? I know there are unnofficial
> packages though, the galeon guys distribute them i think, but no official
> debian packages. skipstone is nice though. (Still eating 20MB though, if i
>
Josh Huber wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason E. Stewart) writes:
>
> > Aww, man, what a drag. PSM was in the 0.9 debs, wasn't it? Is there a
> > separate non-us package that makes them available?
>
> it's just been split:
>
> apt-get install mozilla-psm
>
> :)
Oh my... that's what I get for
"Josh Huber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason E. Stewart) writes:
>
> > Aww, man, what a drag. PSM was in the 0.9 debs, wasn't it? Is there a
> > separate non-us package that makes them available?
>
> it's just been split:
>
> apt-get install mozilla-psm
>
> :)
Oh thanky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason E. Stewart) writes:
> Aww, man, what a drag. PSM was in the 0.9 debs, wasn't it? Is there a
> separate non-us package that makes them available?
it's just been split:
apt-get install mozilla-psm
:)
--
Josh Huber | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
"Michel Dänzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Ethan for the debs, they are a pretty significant improvement
> > over 0.9.
> >
> > Only thing I've found that ticks me off, is I can't log into
> > SourceForge. When I get to http://sourceforge.net/account/lo
"Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
>
> Thanks Ethan for the debs, they are a pretty significant improvement
> over 0.9.
>
> Only thing I've found that ticks me off, is I can't log into
> SourceForge. When I get to http://sourceforge.net/account/login.php
> and type my login/password, and hit the 'Login wi
Thanks Ethan for the debs, they are a pretty significant improvement
over 0.9.
Only thing I've found that ticks me off, is I can't log into
SourceForge. When I get to http://sourceforge.net/account/login.php
and type my login/password, and hit the 'Login with SSL' button,
nothing happens
Anyo
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 05:07:47AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:49:22PM +0200, David N. Welton wrote:
>
> > I think the missing information this person wants to know is that
> > under linux, threads get seperate pid's. It's in the manual, but
> > finding the right manua
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:49:22PM +0200, David N. Welton wrote:
> I think the missing information this person wants to know is that
> under linux, threads get seperate pid's. It's in the manual, but
> finding the right manual might not always be easy. So anyway, to
> answer the question, yes, t
Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The Gnome System Monitor help docs say: "No two processes will
> > have the same number." Therefore my assumption that the five lines
> > I was seeing in gtop were separate processes was perhaps
> > reasonable, given that they all had different PIDs. T
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:29:38PM +1200, Alan Macdougall wrote:
> On 17/6/01 at 1:45 AM, Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Typing "mozilla" at the command line seems to
> > > cause 5 separate processes to be started,
> > > taking in total 149Mb of memory (accorting to
> > > gtop). G
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:29:38PM +1200, Alan Macdougall wrote:
>
> I'm still confused, even after RTFM (very old-skool). There's obviously
> no hope. :-)
read the mozilla FAQ. people only ask this question every time they
look at some linux process viewer and not understand what they are
looki
On 17/6/01 at 1:45 AM, Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Typing "mozilla" at the command line seems to
> > cause 5 separate processes to be started,
> > taking in total 149Mb of memory (accorting to
> > gtop). Given that I only have 64Mb of real RAM
> > and 50Mb of swap it doesn't take m
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 09:56:54AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Ethan Benson wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 11:09:11AM -0700, Taro Fukunaga wrote:
> > >
> > > As for Flash, I'm not sure...
> >
> > there is a free software flash plugin that works with mozilla on
> > freshmeat, just do a s
Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 11:09:11AM -0700, Taro Fukunaga wrote:
> >
> > As for Flash, I'm not sure...
>
> there is a free software flash plugin that works with mozilla on
> freshmeat, just do a search for `flash' and you should find it.
Define 'works'. I've only seen it ki
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 11:09:11AM -0700, Taro Fukunaga wrote:
>
> As for Flash, I'm not sure...
there is a free software flash plugin that works with mozilla on
freshmeat, just do a search for `flash' and you should find it.
--
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
pgpZcpXIIh3r3.pg
Hi,
Use the JDK from here:
http://penguinppc.org/usr/java/
I built mozilla 0.9.1 myself and put a symlink to
/usr/local/j2sdk1.3.0/jre/plugin/ppc/javaplugin.so in
/usr/local/mozilla-0.9.1/bin/plugins
As for Flash, I'm not sure...
-- Taro
Artur Gorniak wrote:
is there java-vm for mozill
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 09:18:21PM +1200, Alan Macdougall wrote:
> Vital stats: Pwer Macintosh 7600/200MHz/64Mb running Woody.
>
> Mozilla 0.9 seems a bit of a hog. (This is build 2001052403 downloaded
> from Ethan's penguinppc repository.)
>
> Typing "mozilla" at the command line seems to cause
is there java-vm for mozilla?
I'm trying to use kaffe. Just started..
Tried to use java-2 from netscape but it's not installing..
Of course I do this in next few hours diffrent way but first
I want to know if there is flash, java aso. for this platform.
Artur Górniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
ADV:
Vital stats: Pwer Macintosh 7600/200MHz/64Mb running Woody.
Mozilla 0.9 seems a bit of a hog. (This is build 2001052403 downloaded
from Ethan's penguinppc repository.)
Typing "mozilla" at the command line seems to cause 5 separate processes
to be started, taking in total 149Mb of memory (accorti
37 matches
Mail list logo
