Re: [RFC] Even on freez does this bug need to go to ghostscript ?

2012-07-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-07-24 at 06:36pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > I have made a past for ghostscript that will ease the debugging of > ghostscript problem. > > Instead of printing numeric error ghostscript will print > strerror(error). > > It is a one liner quite safe because code path is tested on dos and >

Re: Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

2012-07-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-07-24 at 03:49pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Generally, please do *not* change packaging style without consent! > > > > I notice that you've added a patch branch to the ghostscript git - > > please remove that again. > > Could no

Bug#682694: libsane-hpaio: hp-scan : Unable to set option resolution with Photosmart C6300

2012-07-24 Thread hugeanes
Package: libsane-hpaio Version: 3.12.6-3 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, No scan resolution available on xsane application, and hp-scan shows "Unable to set option resolution" and "Unable to set option source to value Flatbed". Meanwhile scanning are performed, probably at 300dpi by default. I

[RFC] Even on freez does this bug need to go to ghostscript ?

2012-07-24 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Hi, I have made a past for ghostscript that will ease the debugging of ghostscript problem. Instead of printing numeric error ghostscript will print strerror(error). It is a one liner quite safe because code path is tested on dos and windows (please do not laugth). Now: * do you think this patc

Re: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#681851: escputil: requires module usblp which is blacklisted by CUPS

2012-07-24 Thread Till Kamppeter
On 07/24/2012 09:09 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: Now for Wheezy, I can't have a solid enough on the changes introduced after 1.5.3-1. 1.5.3-2 didn't migrate because the mips build failed; I suspect this can be solved by a build on (currently down) ball.debian.org. Till: are there atomic chang

Re: Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

2012-07-24 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 12-07-24 at 03:49pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> > Please subscribe to our mailinglist and tell me, so we can drop the cc. > > Did you see the above? Done a few minute after

Re: Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

2012-07-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-07-24 at 03:49pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Please subscribe to our mailinglist and tell me, so we can drop the cc. Did you see the above? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136

Re: Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

2012-07-24 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 12-07-24 at 01:52pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> Ok I am member of collab maint. > > Good. > > Please subscribe to our mailinglist and tell me, so we can drop the cc. > > >> BTW I see taht you hve managed to get some of my documentation

Bug#632031: marked as done (Difficult to parse error in case of broken bounding box/pages)

2012-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:41:02 +0200 with message-id <201207241541.02753.roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> and subject line Done: Difficult to parse error in case of broken bounding box/pages has caused the Debian Bug report #632031, regarding Difficult to parse error in case of broken bo

Processed: your mail

2012-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 582522 - wontfix Bug #582522 [ghostscript] please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly Removed tag(s) wontfix. > tags 618361 + pending Bug #618361 [ghostscript] most directories documented wrong Added tag(s) pend

Re: Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

2012-07-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-07-24 at 01:52pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Ok I am member of collab maint. Good. Please subscribe to our mailinglist and tell me, so we can drop the cc. > BTW I see taht you hve managed to get some of my documentation patch > applied. > > How do you apply patch ? > > I like cdbs so I

Re: Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

2012-07-24 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi Bastien, > > I now moved this discussion to our team mailinglist. I have cc'ed you > for now - please tell if (or when) you are subscribed there. > > On 12-07-24 at 11:35am, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> Dear johnas could you add me to m

Re: Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

2012-07-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Bastien, I now moved this discussion to our team mailinglist. I have cc'ed you for now - please tell if (or when) you are subscribed there. On 12-07-24 at 11:35am, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Dear johnas could you add me to maintener list o ghostscript ? Great that you wanna join! Practical

Bug#582846: [ghostscript] Could you try to reproduce your bug ?

2012-07-24 Thread dai
submitter 582846 ! thanks On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:08:45PM +0200, bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Could you try to reproduce this bug with the newer ghostscript. > > I could not reproduce with 9.05~dfsg-6 I could reproduce with 9.05~dfsg-6. I think it depends installed fonts. % ghostscript iso2022

Processed: Re: [ghostscript] Could you try to reproduce your bug ?

2012-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > submitter 582846 ! Bug #582846 [ghostscript] ghostscript: example CJK postscript files cause segfault when gs quit Changed Bug submitter to 'd...@debian.org' from '"VDR dai \(deb\)" ' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

2012-07-24 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > tags pending > thanks > > On 12-07-23 at 05:13pm, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> >> > Ok see patch >> >> Thank you. Looks good to me. > > Looks good to me too. Applied! Dear johnas could you add me to maintener l

Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

2012-07-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
tags pending thanks On 12-07-23 at 05:13pm, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > > Ok see patch > > Thank you. Looks good to me. Looks good to me too. Applied! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.d

Re: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#681851: escputil: requires module usblp which is blacklisted by CUPS

2012-07-24 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Hi Martin, thanks for your feedback, Le samedi, 21 juillet 2012 16.41:48, Martin Pitt a écrit : > For the record -- there are no real Debian cups maintainers at the > moment. Till is working on Ubuntu, and I haven't had an actual printer > (nor real interest in it) for several years now. Unfortun