On Sun 04 Nov 2018 at 22:44:47 +0100, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Brian Potkin wrote:
> >
> > Can we just forget about the bug you reported for a while and, to begin
> > with, get you printing satisfactorily?
>
> But than you forget about the scanning, don't you, which
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Brian Potkin wrote:
>
> Can we just forget about the bug you reported for a while and, to begin
> with, get you printing satisfactorily?
But than you forget about the scanning, don't you, which is the major
part of the problem.
> Why tie yourself into the tyranny of vendor
On Sun 04 Nov 2018 at 20:03:52 +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote:
> Brian, if the user only wants to print with his printer (is it a print-only
> device or a multi-function device with scanner) driverless IPP printing
> works indeed, especially with HP devices. Then this is the recommended
> solution.
In general, it looks like that the HPLIP guys at HP are not testing well
the GUI part. This caused the following bugs, all forwarded upstream but
no fixes from upstream yet, only distro patches in the Ubuntu Cosmic
package of HPLIP (3.18.7+dfsg1-2ubuntu2):
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1688684
Brian, if the user only wants to print with his printer (is it a
print-only device or a multi-function device with scanner) driverless
IPP printing works indeed, especially with HP devices. Then this is the
recommended solution.
Only for scanning one still needs drivers and in case of HP's
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2018 19:01:16 +0100
Source: ghostscript
Binary: ghostscript ghostscript-x ghostscript-doc libgs9 libgs9-common
libgs-dev ghostscript-dbg
Architecture: source
Version: 9.25~dfsg-7
Distribution: unstable
On Sun 04 Nov 2018 at 15:45:41 +0100, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 Nov 2018, Brian Potkin wrote:
> > > On Sat 03 Nov 2018 at 19:20:42 +0100, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> > >
> > > > Package: hplip-data
> > > > Version:
ghostscript_9.25~dfsg-7_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ghostscript_9.25~dfsg-7.dsc
ghostscript_9.25~dfsg-7.debian.tar.xz
ghostscript_9.25~dfsg-7_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2018 18:19:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#912847: fixed in ghostscript 9.25~dfsg-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #912847,
regarding ghostscript ftbfs on amd64, not installable, breaking many binary-all
builds
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Nov 2018, Brian Potkin wrote:
> > On Sat 03 Nov 2018 at 19:20:42 +0100, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> >
> > > Package: hplip-data
> > > Version: 3.18.10+dfsg0-1
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Justification: renders package unusable
On Sat, 3 Nov 2018, Brian Potkin wrote:
> On Sat 03 Nov 2018 at 19:02:37 +0100, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
>
> > Package: hplip
> > Version: 3.18.10+dfsg0-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > $ hp-doctor
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File
11 matches
Mail list logo
