riscv64 (Closes: #1073046)
Would be great if the testsuite could be disabled for sparc64 as well
if there is no prospective fix for the testsuite failures in sight.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
raw=0
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
n
> build daemons.
Thanks a lot for your quick reaction. This really helps getting sparc64
into shape :).
Adrian
- --
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG
r_id@Base 9.16~dfsg
is correct.
See, for example libechonest [1].
Thanks,
Adrian
>
http://sources.debian.net/src/libechonest/2.3.1-0.3/debian/libechonest2.
3.symbols/
- --
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Frei
previous commit you linked does exactly that on sparc*:
-DGS_USE_MEMORY_HEADER_ID=0
So the the #ifdef in gxobj.h is consequently not triggered and hdr_id
is not present. I don't see any contradiction here. Your initial
assumption was absolutely spot on.
Cheers,
Adrian
- --
.'&#
so advice on how
> best to proceed is appreciated.
Just prepend this symbol with "(arch!=sparc arch!=sparc64)" so that
the line becomes:
(arch!=sparc arch!=sparc64) hdr_id@Base 9.10~dfsg
Cheers,
Adrian
- --
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - g
ork without issues and we therefore
might just go ahead and patch the symbols file as suggested, but it would
be still be good if someone could have a deeper look at this. Maybe it's
any of the (transitive) build dependencies of ghostscript which need to be
rebuilt?
Cheers,
Adrian
--
.&
ng and compressing a few text files like that,
but ok.
> You can always get the PPD file with calling the archive as
> follows:
>
> $ /usr/lib/cups/driver/postscript-hp cat
> "postscript-hp:0/ppd/hplip/HP/hp-designjet_t2300_postscript-ps.ppd"
Ok, good to know. Thanks fo
Hi!
On 07/01/2015 05:22 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> While setting up a new print server on the network, we noticed that the binary
> package printer-driver-postscript-hp is missing the PPDs for many postscript
> printers actually supported by hplip.
Just saw that hplip wa
is missing the PPD files for the OfficeJet Pro X476dw
printer we wanted to install on location.
Cheers,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG:
10 matches
Mail list logo
