On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 08:33:37AM -0700, Darren O. Benham wrote:
>
> So, for the official record, Debian Project Secretary hasn't received a
> formal proposal...
Ok let's consider it ``draft'', or better yet, ``RFC''. The
Project as a whole, and the Secretary in particular, will
receive a propos
On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 03:05:49PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
>
> I was under the impression that the package pools idea was orthogonal
> to this (I could be missing the point, not having paying very close
> attention to this re-hashing of the issue).
>
> The package pools bit that I was in favou
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 09:55:03PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Darren O. Benham wrote:
> > For the official record, as Debian Project Secretary, I have not received a
> > formal proposal and the only message I read on debian-project (I thought)
> > said "draft".
>
> He said he had planned to post it
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can people who favor package pools come up with a list of things package
> pools give us that this much simpler approach doesn't?
I was under the impression that the package pools idea was orthogonal
to this (I could be missing the point, not having paying
4 matches
Mail list logo