Re: Package Pools (List change, Lalo please notice)

1999-10-27 Thread Lalo Martins
On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 08:33:37AM -0700, Darren O. Benham wrote: > > So, for the official record, Debian Project Secretary hasn't received a > formal proposal... Ok let's consider it ``draft'', or better yet, ``RFC''. The Project as a whole, and the Secretary in particular, will receive a propos

Re: Proposal: incremental release process (the package pool)

1999-10-27 Thread Fabrizio Polacco
On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 03:05:49PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > > I was under the impression that the package pools idea was orthogonal > to this (I could be missing the point, not having paying very close > attention to this re-hashing of the issue). > > The package pools bit that I was in favou

Re: Package Pools (List change, Lalo please notice)

1999-10-27 Thread Darren O. Benham
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 09:55:03PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > Darren O. Benham wrote: > > For the official record, as Debian Project Secretary, I have not received a > > formal proposal and the only message I read on debian-project (I thought) > > said "draft". > > He said he had planned to post it

Re: Proposal: incremental release process (the package pool)

1999-10-27 Thread Philip Hands
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can people who favor package pools come up with a list of things package > pools give us that this much simpler approach doesn't? I was under the impression that the package pools idea was orthogonal to this (I could be missing the point, not having paying