On RCness and the use of the BTS, etc

2002-11-11 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 02:36:44PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > [-project and -policy, I CCed you because I'm raising issues relevant to > you; *please* honor the Mail-Followup-To: header!] The one that says only post to the bug and -ctte? Weird. I don't think any of the following is likely to

Re: Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?

2002-11-11 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 02:29:54PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Branden Robinson wrote: > > My feeling as package maintainer is that, if you as Release Manager > > don't regard it is a show-stopper for release, then I should be > > permitted to prioritize the bug as I see fit. >

Re: Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?

2002-11-11 Thread Adam Heath
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Branden Robinson wrote: > [-project and -policy, I CCed you because I'm raising issues relevant to > you; *please* honor the Mail-Followup-To: header!] Er, why -ctte and the bug only? My response is germane to more than these groups. In fact, this really doesn't have any pa

Re: Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?

2002-11-11 Thread Branden Robinson
[-project and -policy, I CCed you because I'm raising issues relevant to you; *please* honor the Mail-Followup-To: header!] On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:28:34AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > We therefore recommend that > > > > * The bug system administrators and/or the project leader or some >

Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?

2002-11-11 Thread Anthony Towns
reassign 97671 tech-ctte thanks > Anthony has offered no basis for his latest manipulation of my bug list > aside from the derisive remark in the Subject:. > > I am requesting the Technical Committee's resolution of this dispute > under Section 6.1 of the Constitution. Both parties stipulate tha

Processed: Re: Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile?

2002-11-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 97671 tech-ctte Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile? Bug reassigned from package `bugs.debian.org, project' to `tech-ctte'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Re: debian advocacy suggestions, anyone?

2002-11-11 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 05:08:35PM +0700, Robert Lemmen wrote: > > The list is no more, so debian-project@lists.debian.org is the proper > > place. > > in that case it would be good to mark the list as such on the website. Fixes are committed, thanks. -- 2. That which causes joy or happine

Re: debian advocacy suggestions, anyone?

2002-11-11 Thread Robert Lemmen
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 02:07:42PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > May I ask that you use the term GNU/Linux instead of linux? Yes, > that's nitpicky, but we're at Debian here. > i will, but please excuse me not to spell out everything in mails. thinking of it especially the recursive acronymes m

Re: debian advocacy suggestions, anyone?

2002-11-11 Thread Robert Lemmen
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 01:58:24PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > The list is no more, so debian-project@lists.debian.org is the proper > place. in that case it would be good to mark the list as such on the website. cu robert