On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 02:42:54PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
We _do_ plan to be LSB compliant eventually. We are, in general, very
strong believers in open standards. But the LSB is not our top
priority at the moment, because it's not something our users are
demanding.
``From my vantage
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 04:48:29PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 02:42:54PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
We _do_ plan to be LSB compliant eventually. We are, in general, very
strong believers in open standards. But the LSB is not our top
priority at the moment, because
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 04:48:29PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Isn't this whole thread about our users demanding it?
If that's your interpretation of the thread (and it's not mine), then
hadn't you better get cracking at implementing whatever the missing
pieces might be? Actions speak louder
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 12:16:14AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 04:48:29PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Isn't this whole thread about our users demanding it?
If that's your interpretation of the thread (and it's not mine), then
hadn't you better get cracking at
Title: Message
News about Debian on MIPS
September 28th, 2002
-- We do have a bootable SGI Mips
iso image (IP22 only) now.
I seen this in the
news portion of your website and was wondering if you could tell me where I can
download it from.
Thanks,
Jay Schlatter
Manager
Information
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 08:50:43PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
What's wrong with our mail system? Why can't the debian admins blacklist
a well known spammer, or even better use a reputable DNSBL like SBL?
I asked the same questions to the debian admins but nobody ever replied,
I'm sick of
6 matches
Mail list logo
