On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 04:58:22PM +, Dylan Thurston wrote:
> IANAL, but I believe that according to US law there are limits on who
> non-profits can give money to: if the lab is not a non-profit
> corporation, SPI could not (in my understanding) give money to the
> lab. OTOH, SPI could surely
you can find a pretty good overview over different high-availibility
clustering solutions on www.linux-ha.org
it depends on what you want to accomplish. i recommend drbd rather than
rsync for data replication (real-time replication with standard
hardware, working with databases (mysql,postgr
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 05:15:30PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 03:47:15PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
> Leader wrote:
> > * Anthony Towns [2003-09-20 17:07]:
> >
> > > By contrast, I wouldn't have a problem in principle with, eg, "HP
> > > Debian Labs".
> >
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 03:43:18PM -0700, Derek Neighbors wrote:
> Is the only currently discussed benefit use of the "Debian"
> trademark? If so, do you want to consider other benefits? Some
> thoughts that come to mind would be allowing them some greater say
> in project issues. However, perso
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 04:07:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 10:58:30PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > > Charitable organisations have to fulfill a particular set of rules; like
> > > being educational, helping the homeless, that sort of thing.
> > True, but generall
Sorry to be replying to this so late but the part of this thread that
is living on drew me back into this where I realized I had not
answered.
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 05:21:34PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> >I am curious about why? You state you don't want to see it, but
> >don't give any supporting ar
On 14 Oct 2003, at 18:55, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Are you familiar with the passage in question?
> I believe so. I cannot read Manoj's mind either, however, so cannot
> determine his opinion of it, other than as expressed.
This here bug was closed the first time on 10/3/03. I reopened it on 10/9/
On 14 Oct 2003, at 13:23, Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ... a sane man (that's you) ...
> Take that back! How DARE you accuse me of sanity!!
Sorry, but such ready wit and saucy humor PROVES you're sane!
The bumbling A. Costa said to MJ Ray:
> Sorry to have incensed you by trivializing the class struggle! The use of
> 'aristocrat' was a tweak at Manoj's philosophy, who in a Slashdot thread once
> quoted Ayn Rand, then compared the Debian developers to an aristocratic
> meritocracy.
Correction,
On 2003-10-22 18:28:21 +0100 "Alfie Costa (backup address)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Please do not reopen this bug unless you have anything new to add."
So there's 127 lines of new stuff in there.
New data does not necessarily translate to new information. The
rebuttal of your argum
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:37:14PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:08:08PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
>
> > Due to googling, and information from an anonymous source, I have
> > reason to believe that I am listed in the variable @gFuckheads. Needless
> > to say, I wou
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:31:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:37:14PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:08:08PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> >
> > > Due to googling, and information from an anonymous source, I have
> > > reason to beli
12 matches
Mail list logo
