On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 05:31:52PM -0500, Evan Prodromou wrote:
Within our project, if you consider the most effective DDs*, you're
going to also be thinking of the most reasonable, thoughtful, and
friendly ones.
No, I'd say that's entirely wrong. The rest of your mail was based on
similarly
On 2004-03-22 21:52:52 + Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't want people to say this might be suboptimal instead of this
is crap, because then I won't be able to tell the difference between
things that are crap and things that are suboptimal. I *want* to know
when something is
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 09:42:47AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
Hey, sure. It's impossible not to offend anyone. But it's always
possible to deal with people politely and respectfully. How they react
is their own business.
That attitude was the cause of the Earth-Minbari war.
And hey, we
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:09:48AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
On 2004-03-22 21:52:52 + Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't want people to say this might be suboptimal instead of this
is crap, because then I won't be able to tell the difference between
things that are crap and
AS == Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Me Within our project, if you consider the most effective DDs*,
Me you're going to also be thinking of the most reasonable,
Me thoughtful, and friendly ones.
AS No, I'd say that's entirely wrong.
I'd say that you're being
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 09:28:12PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 09:14:52AM -0500, Evan Prodromou wrote:
AS The rest of your mail was based on similarly dumb ideas.
Which ideas do I have that are so dumb?
That you shouldn't be mean when you don't have to?
Evan Prodromou wrote:
AS == Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AS Sure, and that's best accomplished by everybody not being a
AS wuss.
It doesn't make you a wuss to be respectful to others. Quite the
contrary: the strong know their own strength and don't need to flex
Andrew Suffield wrote:
If people address issues rather than personalitites then everything
you have said is completely irrelevant, because they aren't going to
be perturbed by the speech pattern of the people they are talking
to, so we can phrase things however we damn well please.
You're
당사 메일서버에 설치된 V3 백신에서, debian-project@lists.debian.org
님이 보낸 메일을 검사한 결과,
바이러스 감염이 확인되었으며 다음과 같이 정책에 따라 처리하였습니다.
(Win32/Netsky.worm.17424 바이러스는 메일의 [보낸 사람] 계정을 속일 수 있으므로
실제 보낸 사용자 계정과 다를 수 있습니다.)
궁금한 사항은 관리자에게 문의하시기
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 02:56:15AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
One of the things Bruce did (before my time, I think) was ban people from
the lists, or convert them to daily digest mode for not acting with
an appropriate amount of decorum. I can't imagine a DPL getting away
with trying that
10 matches
Mail list logo
