On Sun, 24 Apr 2005, Branden Robinson / Debian Project Leader wrote:
I realize that a closed meeting is not ideal; I welcome suggestions
on how to balance the accountability of the DPL and the leadership
team with the necessity of dealing with the occasional sensitive
issue in a more discrete
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:39:55AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
On Monday 25 April 2005 08.03, Branden Robinson / Debian Project Leader
wrote:
* establishing a backup site for ``snapshot.debian.net``
I wonder if snapshot shouldn't be promoted to an official debian.*org*
service in
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 01:03:35AM -0500, Branden Robinson / Debian Project
Leader wrote:
Here is the first of my reports as Debian Project Leader. You may read it
in HTML format at:
http://people.debian.org/~branden/dpl/reports/2005-04-24.html
(First suggestion: set M-F-T appropriately.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I hope I'm not alone when I say that this confidentiality and seemingly
crass Besserwisser tone concerns me. Because I am not experienced
with the politics of Debian, this is all I will say.
It is not ideal as Branden says. But I prefer closed groups who does
some
Le Lundi 25 Avril 2005 08:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
I hope I'm not alone when I say that this confidentiality and
seemingly crass Besserwisser tone concerns me. Because I am not
experienced with the politics of Debian, this is all I will say.
the point is, a DPL as a single person, may
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:39:55AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
On Monday 25 April 2005 08.03, Branden Robinson / Debian Project Leader
wrote:
* establishing a backup site for ``snapshot.debian.net``
I wonder if snapshot shouldn't be promoted to an official
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:15:57AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
The snapshot service is very valuable when it comes to checking older
versions of packages. For example, it is a very, very good help for
doing security work when older package versions need to be reviewed.
Does that include the
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:15:57AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:39:55AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
On Monday 25 April 2005 08.03, Branden Robinson / Debian Project Leader
wrote:
* establishing a backup site for
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:15:57AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
The snapshot service is very valuable when it comes to checking older
versions of packages. For example, it is a very, very good help for
doing security work when older package versions need to be
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
and users apprised of this central issue. If the release managers see
that this report is correlated with a spike in reckless uploads to
[...]
Just a bit of (hopefully constructive) feedback: I find the above to be
quite unnecessarily
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050425 11:40]:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:15:57AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
The snapshot service is very valuable when it comes to checking older
versions of packages. For example, it is a very, very good help for
doing security work when
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 01:12:43PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
I consider binary packages as extrem useful to check for dependency
changes etc,
That can be done by having an archive of packages files alone.
or for fixing issues in some core packages where you need to take an
older version
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 01:21:04PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 01:12:43PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
I consider binary packages as extrem useful to check for dependency
changes etc,
That can be done by having an archive of packages files alone.
or for
On Monday 25 April 2005 14:10, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
I think the request is ok (and the release managers have requested
the same before, quite reasonably). My complaint was Branden's threat:
if his email triggers more uploads, he'll stop sending emails.
er, no, if it triggers an upload storm,
Steve Langasek wrote:
I wonder if snapshot shouldn't be promoted to an official debian.*org*
service in recognition of its value to the project.
One concern I have, personally, is over precisely how much value
snapshot.d.n provides to the *project*, as opposed to providing value
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 02:36:35PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Monday 25 April 2005 14:10, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
I think the request is ok (and the release managers have requested
the same before, quite reasonably). My complaint was Branden's threat:
if his email triggers
On Monday 25 April 2005 15:40, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 02:36:35PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
wrote:
On Monday 25 April 2005 14:10, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
I think the request is ok (and the release managers have requested
the same before, quite reasonably). My
ma, 2005-04-25 kello 11:37 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar kirjoitti:
Does that include the binary packages? I'd guess that binary packages
are of lesser use because of library and other environmental changes,
and it is mainly/exclusively the source packages that are of assistance
in this matter.
Para não receber mais e-mail da Top Avestruz envie para [EMAIL PROTECTED]
assunto: Remover
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.2 - Release Date: 21/4/2005
I wonder if snapshot shouldn't be promoted to an official debian.*org*
service in recognition of its value to the project.
Summarizing the discussion so far:
(1) drain of funds / should Debian really purchase disk space of that size?
(1.4TB, growing and growing...)
(2) there is also
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 10:37:48PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
I wonder if snapshot shouldn't be promoted to an official debian.*org*
service in recognition of its value to the project.
Summarizing the discussion so far:
[...]
an interesting data point would be how much the service is
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 03:14:41PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
I wonder if snapshot shouldn't be promoted to an official
debian.*org*
service in recognition of its value to the project.
One concern I have, personally, is over precisely how much value
* Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-25 13:12]:
I consider binary packages as extrem useful to check for dependency
changes etc, or for fixing issues in some core packages where you
need to take an older version for building a newer one.
Also, snapshot.d.net could be used for automated
* martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-25 19:58]:
Instead, if you really want to set up a European mirror, buy
a couple of disks in Japan, ask them folks over there to make
a copy, set it up with the same scripts here, rsync it once, and
name it snapshot-eu.debian.net.
Actually, that's
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Michael Banck wrote:
I hope I'm not alone when I say that you hiding behind such a laughable
email address concerns me.
If you want to be part of the Debian community (and posting to -project
pretty much indicates that), you should get a real name and email
address now.
25 matches
Mail list logo
