Re: Debian Core Consortium

2005-07-25 Thread Miguel Gea Milvaques
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephen Frost wrote: * Ian Murdock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Stephen Frost wrote: Uh, my response would be appropriate if Debian *did* have the trademark policy Linus uses for Linux. It's basically ask first, get an official submark before using

Re: Debian Core Consortium

2005-07-25 Thread Andreas Barth
* Alexander Wirt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050724 12:58]: Florian Weimer schrieb am Sonntag, den 24. Juli 2005: How is Debian related to the Debian Core Consortium? Why are they using the name Debian? Maybe you sould wait until its been more than a plan to do something before crying about

Re: Debian Core Consortium

2005-07-25 Thread Stephen Frost
* Thomas Viehmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Martin Michlmayr wrote: Trusted Debian was an open source project too and yet the Debian project felt their use of the DEBIAN mark wasn't appropriate. There is an effort going on to update the trademark policy (which will also make it clearer

Re: Debian Core Consortium

2005-07-25 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Stephen Frost wrote: * Thomas Viehmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Maybe it would be great to come up with something that can be used by everyone interested. I'm thinking along the lines granting a license to use Debian derived as part of the name for products / efforts to create products derived

Re: Debian Core Consortium

2005-07-25 Thread Andreas Barth
* Thomas Viehmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050725 22:32]: Stephen Frost wrote: * Thomas Viehmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Maybe it would be great to come up with something that can be used by everyone interested. I'm thinking along the lines granting a license to use Debian derived as part of

Re: {SPAM} Re: Debian Core Consortium

2005-07-25 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Em Dom, 2005-07-24 às 10:44 -0500, Ian Murdock escreveu: But I don't see anything in here that's incompatible with what we're doing--for one, this isn't a business (it's not even really a consortium, since there won't be any formal organization behind it--the best way to describe it is that