also sprach MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.08.08.2259 +0200]:
Since 1 July, new mirror reports open a wishlist bug against
the mirrors package and someone handles it when we get time.
We'd welcome more help with http://bugs.debian.org/mirrors -
if you're not a DD, mail me patches. Warning: I'm
At Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:39:25 +0200,
martin f krafft wrote:
Hi
I'm one of at least two handling mirrors bugs now. Can you tell me
how it's being reformed, please? I've heard nothing yet AFAICR.
I don't think people associated you with mirrors previously, and
it's the first time I've seen
[Martin F Krafft]
I am not sure this is such a good idea for privacy reasons. If I
mail mirrors@, I am not warned that my message will be publicly
readable.
You actually thought correspondence with a free software project would
be non-public? I find that rather unusual.
I would say that
also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.08.09.1245 +0200]:
I am not sure this is such a good idea for privacy reasons. If I
mail mirrors@, I am not warned that my message will be publicly
readable.
You actually thought correspondence with a free software project would
be
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.08.08.2259 +0200]:
Since 1 July, new mirror reports open a wishlist bug against
the mirrors package and someone handles it when we get time.
I am not sure this is such a good idea for privacy reasons. If
I
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feel free to make a change and announce it. I never saw an
announcement that on July 1, the mirror submission form would
automatically file bugs. I don't oppose to this, but I certainly
oppose to it just happening.
Most web site changes aren't
MJ,
In this case, I believe you're confused about what the DFSG says about
trademarks.
DFSG #4 very clearly states: The license may require derived works
to carry a different name or version number from the original software.
When creating the DFSG, I recognized, and respected, the right of
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 12:48:16 -0400, Joe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
May I suggest a less controversial way to handle this would be to
have a script that automaticly closes *new* wishlist bugs and sends
the submitter a message like this:
If someone finds such a script in existence,
On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 16:26:24 +0200, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
My personal choice is to forward the bug reports in the cases it
makes sense, after triaging the report (yes, I triage rteports to
save my upstreams time); and in cases it makes sense, I ask
On 8/9/05, Bruce Perens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian has solidly beaten Novell in the market.
Wonderful news if true, but where's the evidence?
--
Andrew Saunders
quote who=Bruce Perens date=Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:34:41AM -0700
This latest round was provoked by the DCC announcement. I participated
in the DCCA meeting yesterday evening. The organization has agreed to
call themselves the Debian Common Core Association in order to make it
more clear that
sigh I absolutely *hate* being forced to defend myself against this
crap and as a general rule, don't. But mob rule is one step too far.
There is a small group of people in this project who have spent the
past several years trashing me in every forum they can. They've been
putting around this
On 8/9/05, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is: think for yourself, and consider the sources of what you think you
know. How accurate is it *really*? What do you find when you look at
the things which actually happened?
That's sage advice. However, mako stated: If you read the Debian
The notion of a pledge to killfile Andrew is thoroughly juvenile. I
am probably as guilty (if that is the word) as anyone of negatively
critiquing his conduct on public Debian lists; but I would be
horrified to see him censored. Surely, even if every unkind thing I
have seen written about him
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 05:08:02PM -0700, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
The notion of a pledge to killfile Andrew is thoroughly juvenile. I
am probably as guilty (if that is the word) as anyone of negatively
critiquing his conduct on public Debian lists; but I would be
horrified to see him
On 8/9/05, Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael K. Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The notion of a pledge to killfile Andrew is thoroughly juvenile. I
am probably as guilty (if that is the word) as anyone of negatively
critiquing his conduct on public Debian lists; but I would
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Nobody has proposed censoring Andrew. People are simply stating that
they will stop listening to him. Would you deny them that freedom?
Do that quitely, then. A public motion to killfile someone is a public
statement, and that's how it should be
On 8/9/05, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, quite. First they came for those who gratuitously insulted people on
the lists; then they came for the ones who posted diatribes about RMS's
occupation on -legal; then they came for you, and... oh wait, they already
got you, didn't they.
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 17:08:02 -0700, Michael K Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The notion of a pledge to killfile Andrew is thoroughly juvenile.
I am probably as guilty (if that is the word) as anyone of
negatively critiquing his conduct on public Debian lists; but I
would be horrified to see
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:21:07 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Nobody has proposed censoring Andrew. People are simply stating
that they will stop listening to him. Would you deny them that
freedom?
Do that quitely,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:30:03 -0700, Michael K Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 8/9/05, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, quite. First they came for those who gratuitously insulted
people on the lists; then they came for the ones who posted
diatribes about RMS's occupation on
On 8/9/05, Manoj Srivastava va, manoj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I fail to follow this. Ultimately, killfiling is a personal
decision. If a bunch of people are all of one mind over kill filing
someone, how does it affect the reputation of rational discourse?
Since when have I been
22 matches
Mail list logo
