Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now, if there are people like that who are not DD's, the
question we must ask, is wjy are they not DD's? If they are putting
in the work, and have the same commitment as a DD does, even if they
do not package stuff, why is the project not treating
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now, if there are people like that who are not DD's, the
question we must ask, is wjy are they not DD's? If they are putting
in the work, and have the same commitment as a DD does, even if they
do not package
On 2006/04/05, at 15:27, MJ Ray wrote:
The Debian New Maintainer process is a series of required
proceedings to become a Debian Developer.
-- http://www.debian.org/devel/join/newmaint
Or is the above statement false? It seems to disagree with the
constitution section 3.2.1 Developers are
On 4/5/06, MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can someone who is not a package maintainer become a
developer, if becoming a developer requires being a maintainer?
Not quite, if you contribue to different areas with your effort, you
can bexom a DD, see NM page.
--
Regards,
EddyP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 09:43:57PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 02:36:58PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Benj. Mako Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's argueably the most
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 11:44, JC Helary wrote:
There is a huge confusion between being a developer and having
technical rights, and being a developer and having political rights.
I seriously do wonder why translators, if they really want to get the
developer status, don't get together and
On 2006/04/05, at 20:02, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 11:44, JC Helary wrote:
There is a huge confusion between being a developer and having
technical rights, and being a developer and having political rights.
I seriously do wonder why translators, if they really want to get
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 13:14, JC Helary wrote:
I am not sure what point you are trying to make ?
The point I'm trying to make is that it seems like translators are waiting
for the mountain to come to them (change procedures, make entry easier).
It does not work like that: you have to go to
On 2006/04/05, at 20:53, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 13:14, JC Helary wrote:
I am not sure what point you are trying to make ?
The point I'm trying to make is that it seems like translators are
waiting
for the mountain to come to them (change procedures, make entry
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 14:27, JC Helary wrote:
Besides, the systematic use of developer is also confusing and to
clarify things should be replaced my member as is also hinted in
the same document.
You cannot change the word developer to member without changing the
Debian Constitution [1]
On 2006/04/05, at 21:53, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 14:27, JC Helary wrote:
Besides, the systematic use of developer is also confusing and to
clarify things should be replaced my member as is also hinted in
the same document.
You cannot change the word developer to member
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 12:45:50AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 3 Apr 2006, Wouter Verhelst outgrape:
I don't have any problems per se with non-DD contributors being
allowed to vote on matters of purely technical substance.
I have a problem with _anyone_ voting on a matter
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 07:27:03AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...] and b) there is no clear-cut and
objective criteria currently to identify those people who do make
regular contributions without being a developer.
Unless something has changed since I last
On 5 Apr 2006, JC Helary outgrape:
Obviously, not all managing contributors would need full access
rights to _all_ (or any of) the servers. So in the end we'd still
have a super-class of contributors who are entitled to upload
access but the uploaders would share the political burden with
I am a very new newbie. I am pretty versed with windows OS, but I am looking to learn linux.
I installed debian, the install went fine, but I can not get into the x-windows. I am still stuck in the DOS portion.
I am not understanding the boot process. The system boots, go through
This is not the appropriate mailing list for help requests. Please try
directing further questions to debian-user@lists.debian.org For other
ways of getting help please have a look at
http://www.debian.org/support, where you can find pointers to
newsgroups, forums, and irc channels.
Now,
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 10:59, Fred wrote:
I am a very new newbie. I am pretty versed with windows OS, but I am
looking to learn linux.
I installed debian, the install went fine, but I can not get into the
x-windows. I am still stuck in the DOS portion.
There is no DOS portion in Linux.
quote who=Henning Makholm date=Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 02:36:58PM +0200
How is making long-term, sustained, and significant contributions to
Debian _not_ engaging in development?
If you think that Debian's long-time pro-bono legal counsel is
engaging in development, I think we're just getting
18 matches
Mail list logo
