Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...]
> you're free to submit patches. Until then, I'd prefer if you would not
> reply in a purely polemic way, as your contribution to actually solve
> the problem isn't identifiable.
Remember, you're the idiot who started the polemic "... bullshit.
If t
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 02:59:17PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Not sure if this sort of question is allowed here so if its not I apologise.
>
> I have an Ultra 60 (Sparc) with a raptor GFX video card. How can I configure
> this for X-windows or is it not possible. Would a PGX32 card be
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:39:15PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit JC Helary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> Which makes "Maintainer" unsuitble for translation maintainers how,
> >> exactly?
>
> > Because translators mostly don't "maintain" translations but plainly
> > "contribute" translatio
On 4/8/06, Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> By your argument, then the USA should give all its citizens access to
> >> our nuclear arsenal, launch codes, etc. because we trust them to have
> >> a say in deciding how the government is run.
> >
> > Hmm, I see, you see yourself as govern
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 06:48:27AM -0400, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:35:54AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> >
> >> On Thursday 06 April 2006 23:55, Erinn Clark wrote:
> >>
> >>> Do you mean this question? (Actually about ld, but it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 4/7/06, Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'm sorry. If we can't trust these people not to abuse upload
>>> privileges, then I certainly do not want to see them get a say in
>>> deciding how we conduct
On 4/7/06, Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm sorry. If we can't trust these people not to abuse upload
> > privileges, then I certainly do not want to see them get a say in
> > deciding how we conduct the project's business.
>
> By your argument, then the USA should give
On 7 Apr 2006, Micah Anderson outgrape:
> On 2006-04-06, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 6 Apr 2006, Benj. Mako Hill told this:
>>
>>>
And maybe I'm too heavily steeped in Debian culture to take an
objective view, but I don't see any reason why translators,
docume
On 7 Apr 2006, JC Helary spake thusly:
>>> Did it ever occur to you that one can be an active Debian
>>> contributor and not use Debian at all ?
>>
>> No. And even if it did, I fail to see how that is relevant
>> here. You cannot be an active Debian contributor without knowing
>> about its culture
Re: Manoj Srivastava 2006-04-06 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >> And maybe I'm too heavily steeped in Debian culture to take an
> >> objective view, but I don't see any reason why translators,
> >> documentation writers, artists, et al. should look at the term
> >> "developer" and conclude it's not fo
Scripsit JC Helary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Which makes "Maintainer" unsuitble for translation maintainers how,
>> exactly?
> Because translators mostly don't "maintain" translations but plainly
> "contribute" translations.
A translator whose general modus operandi is leave his translation
unmaint
Not sure if this sort of question is allowed here so if its not I
apologise.
I have an Ultra 60 (Sparc) with a raptor GFX video card. How can I
configure this for X-windows or is it not possible. Would a PGX32 card be
better?
Thanks, Andy Norrie
Not on this list so please CC me.
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> That's total bullshit. If they would really care about joining, they
>> could simply start to read the documentation, which explicitly shows
>> them how to understand the term maintainer and/or developer.
> That's to
On 2006-04-06, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6 Apr 2006, Benj. Mako Hill told this:
>
>>
>>> And maybe I'm too heavily steeped in Debian culture to take an
>>> objective view, but I don't see any reason why translators,
>>> documentation writers, artists, et al. should look at t
On 2006/04/07, at 1:39, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
But requiring people who are not software developers to understand
they suddenly have become developers because Debian is special is a
little far fetched.
I don't see why.
Because the term does not apply to non coders in a normal software
cont
Did it ever occur to you that one can be an active Debian contributor
and not use Debian at all ?
No. And even if it did, I fail to see how that is relevant here. You
cannot be an active Debian contributor without knowing about its
culture, which is what Marc was talking about.
What is Debian
Which makes "Maintainer" unsuitble for translation maintainers how,
exactly?
Because translators mostly don't "maintain" translations but plainly
"contribute" translations.
Ie. Translators mainly _translate_.
What do you call translation maintenance anyway ?
What are the contributors doin
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:35:54AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 06 April 2006 23:55, Erinn Clark wrote:
>>
>>> Do you mean this question? (Actually about ld, but it's the closest one
>>> I found that seemed appropriately irrelevant.)
>>>
>>> I3
El viernes, 7 de abril de 2006 a las 19:27:52 +0900, JC Helary escribía:
> Because translators mostly don't "maintain" translations but plainly
> "contribute" translations.
> Ie. Translators mainly _translate_.
> What do you call translation maintenance anyway ?
Well, after a translation is m
19 matches
Mail list logo
