On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:46:48AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> ===
> 5. Project Leader
>5.1. Powers
> The Project Leader may:
> + 10. In consultation with the developers, make decisions affecting
> + prope
Oh, my my, you don't think I'd let the house of tor
stand there for all to see without some attractive
vinyl siding do you? You misunderstand, the naked tor
was just temporary as we were trying to decide which
_type_ of siding to place over it. Others wanted a
layer of concrete, but that doesn't lo
That's really nothing one extra hop at the end of the
tor tunnel can't handle. :)
Brainstorming on IRC has led to a proposed filter
enhancement to block all
mails sent to this list that have been relayed at any
point through a known
tor router. This would hav
Wouter Verhelst wrote on 11/06/2006 09:54:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 02:39:45PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>>This should refer to another text listing the vetted organizations.
>>One outside the constitution so it can be changed as needed.
>
>
> That's usually bad practice in a constit
Warning: the following is unlikely to be interesting, unless you agreed with MJR
MJR:
The reason people ignore the thread opener is because it's trolling, not
because it targets debian-women.
If Steve Langasek had continued to ignore it, rather than posting
flamebait, I wouldn't have asked th
"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Money means "currency". Like with currency, plurals are not used to indicate
> the amount of the currency. However, when when talking about multiple types
> of currency (multiple types of money) you do use the plural.
Not necessarily multiple currencies, but any
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 05:13:59PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> [debian-women and most named people trimmed. I believe it's
> not wanted there.]
It's not wanted on -project, either. Please discuss with this gentleman
in private if you have the urge to do so.
thanks,
Michael
--
"Oracle in general
"Wouter Verhelst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isn't "money" a word that cannot have a plural form? Not being a native
English speaker, it's pretty hard for me to tell, obviously...
Money means "currency". Like with currency, plurals are not used to indicate
th
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:44:20AM -0700, ntdw ntdw wrote:
> Yea you've become a developer... and have done nearly
> nothing except shill your feminist shit and try to
> turn debian into a woman's project (you are
> succeeding, men are leaving debian because of you and
> your ilk, worthless bitch).
Don't donate to feminist organizations. Donate to
fathers 4 justice or something similar instead. Why
donate to a organization that likes and apreciates
you, as a man, less and less. Debian respects freedom
of speech for women, they can complain about men all
they want and say whatever they want, t
Yea you've become a developer... and have done nearly
nothing except shill your feminist shit and try to
turn debian into a woman's project (you are
succeeding, men are leaving debian because of you and
your ilk, worthless bitch).
I pray that God takes you and all your supporters from
this earth s
Hi Manoj!
* Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-12 15:47]:
> OK, How about this:
(... Manojs suggestion ...)
That sounds fine imo.
Thanks for the work.
yours Martin
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux - The Universal Operating System
Martin Klaffenboeck wrote:
> Ist unter
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:46:48AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> OK, How about this:
Heh. I was going to draft a proposal myself, after a bit of discussion.
Anyway, I guess it doesn't really matter who pushes it forward :-)
Some comments:
[...]
> ==
On 12 Jun 2006, MJ Ray said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> How about simplifying the strictures in the constitution to
>> something like this:
>
> That seems a substantial power transfer to the DPL, with the related
> loss of scrutiny. It may not cause problems now, but it's quite a
>
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 09:23:53AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > How about simplifying the strictures in the constitution to
> > something like this:
>
> That seems a substantial power transfer to the DPL, with the related loss
> of scrutiny. It may not
OK, How about this:
4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
4.1. Powers
Together, the Developers may:
-6. Together with the Project Leader and SPI, make decisions about
- property held in t
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> How about simplifying the strictures in the constitution to
> something like this:
That seems a substantial power transfer to the DPL, with the related loss
of scrutiny. It may not cause problems now, but it's quite a bet on
the financial prudence o
* Manoj Srivastava:
> On 11 Jun 2006, Martin Wuertele stated:
>
> ]Since Debian has no authority to hold money or property, any
> ]donations for the Debian Project must be made to any
> ]one of a set of organizations designated by the Project leader
> } or a delegate to be aut
18 matches
Mail list logo
