Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 05 August 2006 21:20, martin f krafft wrote:
>> I envision a tool (warning: braindump ahead) that we install *by
>> default* on a standard system, which uses cron to wake up once a day
>
> I think that installing it by default is not really an op
Alle Saturday 05 August 2006 21:20, martin f krafft ha scritto:
> So I made a mistake in the mdadm version currently in testing, and
> published [0] to -testing and -user at the same time as I uploaded
> a new version.
Hello,
Thinking as a mere user, the first thing I would do is check the bug re
Am Donnerstag, den 03.08.2006, 22:40 +0200 schrieb Andreas Barth:
> add that suite to their /etc/apt/sources.list; it is still not
> recommended for everyone, and packages in proposed-updates are not yet
> released.
http://www.de.debian.org/releases/stable/errata
Then we should remove the part w
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 03:57:22PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Yeah, I hadn't thought of that. But, ehm, since news bits can be
> > classified per source package, they could be generated once a day, fed
> > to dak and friends, in the pool and pushed
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 12:38:31PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> per second (assuming even distribution). That is not an irrelevant
> amount of traffic even with static web pages, never mind dynamically
> generated, customized RSS feeds.
Just a diff in addition to what has already been said on th
also sprach Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.06.1457 +0100]:
> I wonder how much it would confuse apt and its friends if we simply
> piggybacked the information onto the Packages records by adding a new
> field (with the entire text or just an URL), but without bumping the
> version num
Scripsit Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yeah, I hadn't thought of that. But, ehm, since news bits can be
> classified per source package, they could be generated once a day, fed
> to dak and friends, in the pool and pushed to the mirrors.
I wonder how much it would confuse apt and its friends
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 12:36:59PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.06.1114 +0100]:
> > Yeah, I hadn't thought of that. But, ehm, since news bits can be
> > classified per source package, they could be generated once a day, fed
> > to dak and frie
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 01:28:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> What does the LSB 3.1 say about amd64 and libdirs? Does it require lib
> to contain 32bit libs?
Does this same question apply to other 64bit arches, like sparc64 or powerpc64
for example ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNS
also sprach Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.06.1114 +0100]:
> Yeah, I hadn't thought of that. But, ehm, since news bits can be
> classified per source package, they could be generated once a day, fed
> to dak and friends, in the pool and pushed to the mirrors.
Yes, definitely. We should u
also sprach Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.06.0516 +0100]:
> The service is attractive, but mailing to root... To my great regret,
> on many machine, mail to local users does not get read these days
It would be configurable, just like cron-apt and apt-listchanges
are.
--
Please
What does the LSB 3.1 say about amd64 and libdirs? Does it require lib
to contain 32bit libs?
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lars Wirzenius, 2006-08-06 11:40:06 +0200 :
> One million users polling once day, causing one kilobyte of HTTP
> traffic, results in 30 gigabytes of traffic per month, and about 11
> hits per second (assuming even distribution). That is not an
> irrelevant amount of traffic even with static web pa
su, 2006-08-06 kello 11:33 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli kirjoitti:
> Regarding how to implement it, the most interesting part seems to be
> creating the server side part of the service and make DDs use it. I
> agree with the user comment about using RSS for that.
One million users polling once day, c
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 08:20:55PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> I envision a tool (warning: braindump ahead) that we install *by
> default* on a standard system, which uses cron to wake up once a day
> and check online for important announcements regarding all installed
> packages, and mails the
Hi.
User Here.
RSS would be great, actually. It may not be the flashing red light you're
looking for, but a feed or two for each suite announcing critical updates would
be very much appreciated. Maybe you could ship Firefox (or all the
aggregators in the archive) with something like that
17 matches
Mail list logo
