On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Anyway 2Q is too much in my opinion. Q would be much more reasonable.
See my reply to Bernd why I think its not.
It seems like most people who responded preferred Q up to now. It might
end up as an amendment otherwise. :)
It would be also be good
Don Armstrong dijo [Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 04:18:02PM -0800]:
(...) You should not be proposing or seconding an option that
you don't plan on ranking first.
(or high, as others have said in this thread)
I am not sure about this... Sometimes you are interested in creating a
rich enough set of
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 04:18:02PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
1: I'd be happier, though, if those proposing and seconding options
would be more careful about the effects that their options may have,
and be more vigilant about withdrawing options when more palletable
options exist. You should
3 matches
Mail list logo
