On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Kevin Mark wrote:
If someone goes through the arduious process of becomeing a DD:
proving their knowledge of:
a. FLOSS ideals,
b. Debian ideals,
c. FLOSS legal ideas,
d. computer languages,
e. social skills
f. and patience to wait for various approvals, account
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:52:11PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
But I know that there are/will be DDs which do infrastructure stuff only, and
rarely upload packages. Such DDs should never be regarded as MIA, of course.
I am not convinced of this. Infrastructure contributions are necessary and
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:52:11PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Should activity in teams be enough reason to be regarded as an active DD?
Yes.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:35:00PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Also people who do translations. Perhaps we can institute other
On Fri Jul 24 09:57, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 03:44:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
his is silly
Are you sure that this is not a typo for This is silly? A rather
unfortunate one, since what Manoj wrote looks a lot more like a personal
attack than it
Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:30:17PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
While I do not approve of ad hominem attacks on the mailing
list, I think that we can go over much to the other side: We should not
be overly genteel about silly ideas.
You twist people words
On Fri Jul 24 08:43, Steve Langasek wrote:
I am not convinced of this. Infrastructure contributions are necessary and
valuable, but we don't admit people as Debian Developers on the basis of
infrastructure contributions, nor to work on infrastructure;
They may need (depending what it is they
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 02:19:38AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 23/07/09 at 01:10 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:57:07AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Inactive maintainers do not make harm by definition.
The two are completely orthogonal. Also, I disagree that
Matthew Johnson mj...@debian.org writes:
On Fri Jul 24 09:57, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 03:44:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
his is silly
Are you sure that this is not a typo for This is silly?
It didn't occur to me to interpret it any other way
Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org wrote:
[...] I think that we can go over much to the other side: We should not
be overly genteel about silly ideas. [...]
I don't think there's anything wrong with being a polite society
(=genteel) even when confronted with a silly idea.
Maybe the above
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
Manoj seems to be emitting a great deal more typos to Debian forums in
recent years. Perhaps we should pool together donations for a better
keyboard for him?
Or he should post less and take the time to review what he
writes... (including the pass where
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Twisting people's words is unfortunately very normal behaviour for Manoj.
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Or he should post less and take the time to review what he
writes... (including the pass where he's supposed to remove
the unneeded
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Matthew Johnson wrote:
On Fri Jul 24 08:43, Steve Langasek wrote:
I am not convinced of this. Infrastructure contributions are necessary and
valuable, but we don't admit people as Debian Developers on the basis of
infrastructure contributions, nor to work on
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, MJ Ray wrote:
Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org wrote:
[...] I think that we can go over much to the other side: We should not
be overly genteel about silly ideas. [...]
I don't think there's anything wrong with being a polite society
(=genteel) even when
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:52:11PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Should activity in teams be enough reason to be regarded as an active DD?
Yes.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:35:00PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Also people who do
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Twisting people's words is unfortunately very normal behaviour for Manoj.
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Or he should post less and take the time to review what he
writes... (including the pass where he's supposed to
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:52:11PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Should activity in teams be enough reason to be regarded as an active DD?
Yes.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:35:00PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Also people who do translations. Perhaps we can
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Twisting people's words is unfortunately very normal behaviour for Manoj.
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Or he should post less and take the time to review what he
writes...
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Twisting people's words is unfortunately very normal behaviour for Manoj.
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Or he should post less and take the time to
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Setting up a bot should not be too much work, once we set out
the format of the structured email received. And an archive of the
mail, perhaps sorted by the human it is attributed to, can help a human
auditing the system.
Just use the code and from CIA.vc.
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:52:11PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
But I know that there are/will be DDs which do infrastructure stuff only, and
rarely upload packages. Such DDs should never be regarded as MIA, of course.
I am not convinced of this. Infrastructure
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Twisting people's words is unfortunately very normal behaviour for Manoj.
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Or he
On Fri Jul 24 16:46, Luk Claes wrote:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Twisting people's words is unfortunately very normal behaviour for Manoj.
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Or he should post less and take the time to review what he writes...
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Kevin Mark wrote:
If someone goes through the arduious process of becomeing a DD:
proving their knowledge of:
a. FLOSS ideals,
b. Debian ideals,
c. FLOSS legal ideas,
d. computer languages,
e. social skills
f. and patience to wait for various
Luk Claes wrote:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
...snip...
This is hilarious. Two posts attacking the man -- ad
hominem --
and these are the folks talking about being less aggressive.
Twisting again are you?
Only
Basta con diete lunghe ed estenuanti.Basta pillole che puntualmente
dimentichiamo o lasciamo a casa. E' finalmente arrivata la nuova era del Slim
Diet!La nuova tecnologia ci regala questo nuovo prodotto dimagrante.
Perchè è migliore rispetto agli altri prodotti dimagranti?
Clicca su
25 matches
Mail list logo
