On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 21:13 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 20:53, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > sorry to carry this over to d-project but IMHO the BTS is not the
> > right place for the dispute below, moreover I'd like to learn what
> > Debian's current consent in
Hi,
* Siggy Brentrup [2009-08-11 21:00]:
> sorry to carry this over to d-project but IMHO the BTS is not the
> right place for the dispute below, moreover I'd like to learn what
> Debian's current consent in these matters is.
[...]
Reading through the whole mail I think a PM would be a
better pl
On 2009-08-11, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>> No lp please! here is debian, we got alioth -> use it.
>> Please don't tell me what to do with *my code* should I ever retrieve it.
> it's not your code.
> I filed the bug, so I have a bit of responsibility to hand it to capable
> people.
> Luckily other guys
On 2009-08-11, Anthony Towns wrote:
> (NB: denyhosts 2.6-1etch1 and dircproxy 1.0.5-5etch1 were included in
> 4.0r3, but didn't have a security.d.o upload, afaics. This is effectively
> considering someone who has a DVD of etch r0 and otherwise only updates
>=66rom security.d.o)
Sorry, but the co
On 11837 March 1977, Bernd Brentrup wrote:
> ATM my standard response to requests for help is: nag DAM, I won't
> do any substantial work for Debian without having a vote.
This is surely the wrong attitude.
> What's your decision? I'd really like to contribute to Debian again,
> but there are ot
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 20:53, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> sorry to carry this over to d-project but IMHO the BTS is not the
> right place for the dispute below, moreover I'd like to learn what
> Debian's current consent in these matters is.
>
> appropriate Cc:s set.
>
> I had to pipe Sandr
Hi all,
sorry to carry this over to d-project but IMHO the BTS is not the
right place for the dispute below, moreover I'd like to learn what
Debian's current consent in these matters is.
appropriate Cc:s set.
I had to pipe Sandro's original message through
sed -e 's/NO!!! No lp/N
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:42:24PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Comparison between etch/main and feisty/main+universe by source:
> As at today (2009/08/11) etch/feisty security support compare as follows:
> 63 packages with security updates in both Debian and Ubuntu (11
Hmm, let's try that
Le mardi 11 août 2009 à 02:48 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine a écrit :
> > It is my opinion that freezing after GNOME releases (and gets into
> > testing) would be better for Debian. This means either April or
> > October, depending on which GNOME release we want to ship.
>
> I think that this point t
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 03:55:16PM +, Anthony Towns wrote:
> etch: 2006/12 - 2007/04 (decent hit for feisty's import freeze)
> lenny: 2008/07 - 2009/02 (decent hit for jaunty's import freeze)
>
> dapper and hardy are the two Ubuntu LTS releases so far, dapper reached
> its desktop
Hello,
There are already six Brazilian cities and one at Nicaragua preparing Debian Day
2009 events. (some are almost true IT conferences)
Are there other cities at other countries [0] preparing such events?
Please, spread the word and edit [0] to include other cities.
Regards.
Andre Felipe Machad
11 matches
Mail list logo
