Re: [Debconf-discuss-discuss-discuss-and-keep-discussing] ...

2012-12-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Dear Giacomo, On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:27:18AM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: > On 12/04/2012 10:36 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Is the “outsiders” word also meaning to describe people who were asked > > for sponsorship and discovered later that the brochure they were sent > > had almost

Re: [Debconf-discuss] [Debconf-discuss-discuss-discuss-and-keep-discussing] ...

2012-12-04 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 05 décembre 2012 à 08:27 +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi a écrit : > For a lot of people, your writing seems out of context. > The sponsorship brochure is linked in: > http://debconf13.debconf.org/helpus.xhtml > > If other people find that it *had almost nothing to do* with DebConf, > ple

Re: [Debconf-discuss] [Debconf-discuss-discuss-discuss-and-keep-discussing] ...

2012-12-04 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
On 12/04/2012 10:36 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mardi 04 décembre 2012 à 13:38 -0600, Gunnar Wolf a écrit : >> People, (most of) the Swiss team is pissed with the lack of trust and >> lack of respect we have been showing for months already, and that now >> some very vocal outsiders (i.e. Debia

Re: [Debconf-discuss] ...

2012-12-04 Thread MJ Ray
Leandro Gómez > Yes, please stop this nonsense! OK, sure, but could everyone also please stop this sort of nonsense: > If you haven't been part of local team organizing a DebConf, you don't know > how frustrating and demoralizing this kind of discussion is. [...] and (quoting Gunnar Wolf): > w

Re: [Debconf-discuss-discuss-discuss-and-keep-discussing] ...

2012-12-04 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 04 décembre 2012 à 13:38 -0600, Gunnar Wolf a écrit : > People, (most of) the Swiss team is pissed with the lack of trust and > lack of respect we have been showing for months already, and that now > some very vocal outsiders (i.e. Debian people who are not involved in > this year's DebCon

Re: [Debconf-discuss-discuss-discuss-and-keep-discussing] ...

2012-12-04 Thread Gunnar Wolf
TL;DR ⇒ I'm sick of this discussion. I'm calling the DebConf chairs to vote _NOW_ to sign or repeal the contract. I'm voting to sign. (Do we need consensus between the three? Can we vote?) I will probably do some netiquette breaches in this post... So, apologies to all, but I think

Re: [Debconf-discuss] "Anonymous donation" to Debconf 13

2012-12-04 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Russ Allbery dijo [Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:42:47AM -0800]: > (... big snip ...) > What remedy or action are you looking for here? I don't think breaking > the anonymity of a donation that never happened really makes sense. Are > you looking for site selection to be re-opened? Further reassurance

Re: "Anonymous donation" to Debconf 13

2012-12-04 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 04 décembre 2012 à 15:02 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > If these people > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ankh-Morpork_Assassins%27_Guild > > would use Debian it is perfectl in line with our social contract. > Thus I can't see a reason why they should not sponsor DebConf. There’s a

Re: [Debconf-discuss] "Anonymous donation" to Debconf 13

2012-12-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Ian Jackson writes: > Russ Allbery writes: >> That seems to be exactly what happened. > No. My reading of Moray's message is that some members of the Debconf > teams used the existence of the donation as an argument in favour of > selecting Le Camp as the site. At least for some period of time

Re: [Debconf-discuss] ...

2012-12-04 Thread Leandro Gómez
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sick and saddened to read these mails and will not participate in any > further of this. > > Also, I cannot stop thinking "gigantic bikeshedding (mostly from people who > never build one). And based on rumors of what the bikeshed

Re: [Debconf-discuss] "Anonymous donation" to Debconf 13

2012-12-04 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:21:56PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Russ Allbery writes ("Re: [Debconf-discuss] "Anonymous donation" to Debconf > 13"): > > The part that I'm missing here is what you felt should have been done > > differently. > > This is a reasonable question. > > > Let's assume that

Re: [Debconf-discuss] "Anonymous donation" to Debconf 13

2012-12-04 Thread Ian Jackson
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: [Debconf-discuss] "Anonymous donation" to Debconf 13"): > The part that I'm missing here is what you felt should have been done > differently. This is a reasonable question. > Let's assume that Debian has no control over the offering of the donation > (or loan) in the f

...

2012-12-04 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, I'm sick and saddened to read these mails and will not participate in any further of this. Also, I cannot stop thinking "gigantic bikeshedding (mostly from people who never build one). And based on rumors of what the bikeshed is supposed to look, while not listening to the people who actu

Re: [Debconf-discuss] "Anonymous donation" to Debconf 13

2012-12-04 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 04/12/12 18:02, Russ Allbery wrote: > Daniel Pocock writes: > >> a) Holger, a DebConf chair, was concerned about Le Camp's budget on 25 >> October (referring to it as GourmetConf) and unwilling to support it >> http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/20121025.200948.bca7a335.en.html >> "100k

Re: [Debconf-discuss] "Anonymous donation" to Debconf 13

2012-12-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Daniel Pocock writes: > a) Holger, a DebConf chair, was concerned about Le Camp's budget on 25 > October (referring to it as GourmetConf) and unwilling to support it > http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/20121025.200948.bca7a335.en.html > "100k for food is just insane. We are neither GourmetC

Re: [Debconf-discuss] "Anonymous donation" to Debconf 13

2012-12-04 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 04/12/12 17:10, Russ Allbery wrote: > Ian Jackson writes: > >> According to Moray this proposed strings-attached donation was used as >> an argument by some members of the Debconf team in favour of making the >> decision favoured by the donor. That is wholly unacceptable. It >> amounts exa

Re: [Debconf-discuss] "Anonymous donation" to Debconf 13

2012-12-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Ian Jackson writes: > According to Moray this proposed strings-attached donation was used as > an argument by some members of the Debconf team in favour of making the > decision favoured by the donor. That is wholly unacceptable. It > amounts exactly to the donors buying influence. > The fact

Re: [Debconf-discuss] "Anonymous donation" to Debconf 13

2012-12-04 Thread Ian Jackson
Jose Luis Rivas writes ("Re: [Debconf-discuss] "Anonymous donation" to Debconf 13"): > I really thought people working on a project like Debian would understand > the meaning of the "anonymous" word. Then we blame government and > politicians. I'm sorry, I don't follow your point. When politicia

Re: [Debconf-discuss] "Anonymous donation" to Debconf 13

2012-12-04 Thread Ian Jackson
Holger Levsen writes ("Re: [Debconf-discuss] "Anonymous donation" to Debconf 13"): > On Montag, 3. Dezember 2012, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I'm sorry to keep making trouble, but strings-attached offers of > > substantial amounts of money from anonymous donors are a serious > > matter. Even if the de

Re: "Anonymous donation" to Debconf 13

2012-12-04 Thread Ian Jackson
Moray Allan writes ("Re: "Anonymous donation" to Debconf 13"): > Since your questions remain unanswered, I just want to say as one of > the DebConf Chairs that I think the questions are valid, but I > personally don't know any details about this that would help clear them > up. Thanks very much

Re: [Debconf-discuss] "Anonymous donation" to Debconf 13

2012-12-04 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Montag, 3. Dezember 2012, Ian Jackson wrote: > > The "anonymous donations" we got offered were rejected (by us) > Why do you use scare quotes ? for two reasons: a.) because they are not anonymous to me and b.) because I'm not as fluent in english writing as others. > I'm sorry to keep m