Hi everyone,
I am not sure that this is the correct place for my message, but I found
nothing more relevant. Feel free to redirect me if necessary.
Recently I found web site http://bits.debian.org/ which intends to be an
official Debian blog. It is quite beautiful and well designed site. But
one
CC'ing publicity and ana, since she did the technical work from what I
understand
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am not sure that this is the correct place for my message, but I found
nothing more relevant. Feel free to redirect me if
Thanks for help. See attachment.
Or you could use:
{% block title %}{{ article.title }} — {{ super() }}{% endblock %}
I am not sure that will look better.
Best wishes,
Boris
--
http://wiki.debian.org/BorisPek
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:00:19PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
TL;DR: we've been invited to participate into GNOME Outreach Program for
Women and I'd like to accept the invitation. To maximize impact, though,
we need mentors and topics to complement the current GSoC tasks.
OK, so, thanks
This message appears to be more appropriate for -project,
non-candidate responses, please follow up there.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Chris Knadle wrote:
As a bug reporter dealing with a misbehaving maintainer, this is
what I would want:
1. A clear place to report the misbehavior
Hi,
El dv 29 de 03 de 2013 a les 17:41 +0100, en/na Stefano Zacchiroli va
escriure:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:00:19PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
TL;DR: we've been invited to participate into GNOME Outreach Program for
Women and I'd like to accept the invitation. To maximize impact,
On 2013-03-28 16:35, Don Armstrong wrote:
ow...@bugs.debian.org is an appropriate place to report abusive
behavior by anyone (maintainers, users, etc) on the BTS.
But how broad a definition of abusive behaviour are you taking here?
I would have thought of contacting ow...@bugs.debian.org in
Don -- my apologies for not responding to this earlier; somehow I missed this
message, and figured out I had missed it via reading Moray's resonse to it.
On Thursday, March 28, 2013 18:35:40, Don Armstrong wrote:
This message appears to be more appropriate for -project,
non-candidate
8 matches
Mail list logo
