On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:14:39AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> Bastian, I am sorry for your frustration. All I can ask is that you
> please be patient. If your sponsor does not have the time to work
> with you in more or less real-time, consider asking for more help on
> debian-mentors.
>
Y
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 12:58:40AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> I guess Fathi's worked closely with Daniel Glassey (clucene-core), Gustavo
> Franco (desktop-base) and Mark Purcell (KDE extras) so some of them
> might have nice things to say about him that might be worth including.
> If any of t
Package: debian-maintainers
Severity: important
Current package includes in uploaders:
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
AFAIR the Brian Nelson who works as Front Desk, or used to work, is:
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So please, update this.
OTOH, Brian (pyro) does not seem be very active
[Redirecting him to the Debian Venezuela Group]
Douglas,
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 06:15:43PM +0100, UPELDGOMEZ wrote:
>
>
> Muy cordiales saludos a la gente de Debian (a nivel mundial), me dispongo a
> solicitar su valiosa colaboración en el sentido, sea considera a una ayuda
> para migrar las m
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:10:29AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> > Developer Status
> >
>
> And I should probably have written this inside the mail itself, but the
> most obvious things are those you forget.
>
> This was initially written by me, then discussed within DAM (so t
Hi Lars,
Thank you a lot for taking the time in drawing this nice proposal.
I like it in overall, but with some little changes, that have been already
covered in previous emails. Still I am commenting them.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:44:03AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
[...]
> I think we shoul
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 05:49:25PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> New assistants - well. I called for help some time ago. Got *very few*
> replies of which even less matched the expectations (in terms of what
> they volunteer for, limiting yourself to just one kind of work wasn't
> (and isn't) what
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:39:20AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:38:48PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > - We keep the right to refuse *any* candidate for whatever reason.
> >
> > That is not exaclty encouraging. So think maybe you are doin
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 12:20:29AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11622 March 1977, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > The goal of this GR is still unclear to me, and I would welcome a preamble
> > that
> > clearly explains what problem is being solved.
>
> The goal is to change the needed seconds fo
In the moment of writing these lines, we have 361 packages in the NEW queue
[0].
No all of those packages are strictly NEW, some are just packages containing new
binaries or just package renames.
The team who look at this, also handle another stuff like packages removal from
the archive or main
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:30:53AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For years, the DAM and NEW queues have been the major source of
> frustration in the Debian community. Several attempts have been made to
> improve the situation, but the problems have never been really solved so
> far. And
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 04:45:10PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> I've been advocating people "too early" (i.e, I've advocated people so
> that they could start NM, while in the meantime, I wouldn't have
> advocated them for DM). The reason is that the "unassigned applicants"
> list is huge, so,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 06:26:02PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 23/06/09 at 17:10 +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 04:45:10PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > I've been advocating people "too early" (i.e, I've advocated people so
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 03:39:10PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 23/06/09 at 15:30 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 02:55:42PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > Hence I would more welcome one of the following alternative outcomes:
> >
> > 1) drop FD *and* integrate
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:37:30PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> This is how I see the process right now, from the applicant's POV:
>
Actually it is:
> - Applicant applies
> - DD advocates
> (wait1)
- FD ask NM what they do in Debian? [1] Currently, this is a email sent
manually.
-
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:41:40PM +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Goswin von Brederlow
> wrote:
> > It was discussed at debconf. Lots of explanation given there seems to
> > have been left out of the announcement.
>
> BOF? Talk? Where I can find explanation(s)?
>
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:21:09AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
> The Release Team proposed a plan in the keynote at DebConf. There
> were some important considerations, but in general the audience
> welcomed the plan.
>
I am sorry Luk, but keeping in silent does not mean agreing with what has been
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:40:30AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Sune Vuorela wrote:
>
> >We also need to coordinate such things with the larger packaging teams
> >to see wether it fits their schedules and their upstream schedules. For
> >example from a KDE point of view, it is around teh worst time.
Hi,
Agnieszka Czajkowska has presented this morning at DebConf a very nice
redesign proposal off the Debian logo and the Debian website. She has been
working on this all the last year as part of her master thesis in Design.
You can take a look at her presentation at:
https://penta.debconf.org
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 05:23:41PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
>
> Nice. Now we have two approaches on redesigning parts of Debian.
> I do like the design as proposed by Kalle somewhat better.
>
Cool, Care to give a link?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:46:04PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> Discussing about this on irc, some people seemed to agree with my view
> that the female images are too sexual, and that the image of the
> notebook on the pillow is disturbing.
> Some other people seemed to think that I was exa
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:50:41PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> team being the most important, IMHO), but I don't think there is a
> historical precedence (or even clear desire) of the release team
> contacting lots of teams beforehand on release timeline decisions.
>
For the record, mail"KDE pl
Hi,
I have setup http://news.debian.net/ where I intend to publish and link
information related to what is going on in the Debian project.
If you want to submit news you think it is interesting for developers and
users, you have several ways listed at: http://news.debian.net/submit-news/
If you
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 07:53:05PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Out of curiousity, why not feed times.debian.net with these articles?
>
If you are asking why not to publish direclty in times.debian.net I have
addressed it on my blog post. (Not easy way to contribute, mostly oriented to
agreg
[Let's continue discussion only in -publicity, future emails, please drop
-project]
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:10:00PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > I have setup http://news.debian.net/ where I intend to publish and link
> [...]
> > Hope you li
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 05:11:12PM +0200, Ilya Shpan'kov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I work in Opera Software - yes, we make a proprietary browser ;)
>
> Last 7 years I use GNU/Linux and know that, for example, in Russia the
> Opera browser is very popular in GNU/Linux Community. Unfortunately, not
> always
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 07:10:48PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> (Beware sarcasm tags might be missing.)
>
> Ana Guerrero (05/08/2009):
> > Even in the case you release the opera code with a license that allow
> > distributing opera in non-free, there is not much point o
Hi,
We have a significant amount of money, but I would not define it as a
"huge amount".
> There's quite a long list, in *rough* order of the priority I would
> (personally) give them so far.
> 1 New hardware / equipment
> 2 Fund developer gatherings:
My full support to spend money on thi
Thanks Zack for bringing this up.
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:07:04AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Given how useful the service is, and given that it does fulfill the
> purpose of planet (most of the news are community-oriented news), can we
> have it added to Planet?
>
Just a quick note, n
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:12:49AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> IIRC something similar has been discussed previously, when the
> RSS-Feed of the Debian Weekly News was added to planet. I wasn't
> involved back then and would need to search through the archives,
> but since it isn't pr
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 02:36:13PM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>
> Just a quick note, no all the post provided by news.d.n have to be agregated
> to planet. I think the weekly sections (new packages and wnpp[1]) could
> be skipped and just agregate the updates posts ...
I have just ag
Thanks for the suggestions Michael. They do not go too much in the line of
what I try to do in news.d.n. Let me explain you why.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:05:46AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> hand) which Ana might want to consider:
>
> 1. Some (informal) posts are quoted too much in direct spe
Esta lista es inglés, asi que por favor, si escribes o respondes, hazlo en
inglés. Si tienes problemas o no hablas bien inglés, puedes escribir
a la lista de desarrollo en español:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-spanish/
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:07:16PM +0100, Francisco Calero Mata wrot
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 05:16:52PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:53:41AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> > Keeping up with the news is a lot of work, and there's usually not
> > enough people to do it. It doesn't make sense to do the work twice.
> > Why not
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 05:57:02PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> So, unless someone comes up with a good idea on how to solve the
> technical issues and the different content stile issues, I don't
> know much areas to work together.
>
The best ideas to solve these issues will come from
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 03:17:43AM -0300, Jorge Gonçalves wrote:
> Hello!
>
> First, thank you for the great distro that is Debian, one of the best.
>
> I would like to suggest you some way so that the users keep on using
> the good old KDE 3.5 when they migrate to the upcoming Lenny.
>
> Maybe
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 09:14:40AM +0200, mur ferrol wrote:
> Hola no estoy instalando debian pero no encuentro controladores para tarjeta
> de red Intel 82551IT Integrated
> 10BASE-T/100BASE-TX
> Ethernet Controller
> agradeceria respuesta
> saludos y enhorabuena
Hola Mur,
Por favor, dirige tu p
If you are planning to attend to DebConf, it is time to reconfirm!
- Forwarded message from Pablo Duboue -
From: Pablo Duboue
Organization: DebConf10 Local Team
To: debconf-annou...@lists.debconf.org, debconf-t...@lists.debconf.org
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 13:57:12 -0400
Subject: [Debc
Quoting a small paragraph of the loong email:
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 07:01:18PM +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>
> (There are more official Debian Developers in that city but they didn't
> reply to the calls, and they do not maintain packages at least in some
> cases, so
Hi!
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 06:12:25PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 17:54, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> >> Nowadays, It seems that planet.debian.org became an important news
> >> media and has a fairly large number of readers. I think that a large
> >> number of mails sent to d-d-a (or de
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 05:24:40PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > My next question for you (assuming you accept that a discussion on this
> > list is enough to decide on this matter---I personally do) is whether
> > you find that my summa
Hi!
Debian has applied to the Google code-in [1] program as mentoring organization
(Thanks Algernon!) In the Google code-in, pre-university students
(ages 13-17), have the opportunity of contributing to Debian, trying
to complete different tasks.
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/GoogleCodeIn2011
We
Hi!
I have created a Debian Google+ page, DISCLAIMER, this page is not meant to be
a Debian official one since Google+ is a non free service, but I wanted to
share
some things about it and have some public email in Debian lists for people
wondering about the 'officiality' of this page and othe
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 07:06:12PM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> not sure if it has been mentioned somewhere already, but the Proceedings
> of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (aka
> PNAS) has a paper on the evolution of software in Debian.
>
> http://www.p
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 12:09:33PM +, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (I post it in debian-project because I think that it has a broad impact.
> Please move it to other list or ignore if not appropriate.)
>
> Just read this morning these news from a Spanish newspaper (spanish
ist [5] if you have any questions.
Debian's participation in GSoC has always been a great success and we hope
to continue on the same path this year too.
The GSoC admins in Debian,
Gergely Nagy, Sukhbir Singh and Ana Guerrero
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2012/Projects
[2]
ht
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:23:47AM +0200, Alain HUTIE wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We use for our developments Qhull and PyXL (
> http://cbsu.tc.cornell.edu/staff/myers/PyXL/index.html).
>
> We seek, where possible, to use available packages in Squeeze. But as I
> found a package for Qhull as I have not
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 01:32:34PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> [CC'ing kxra, who isn't subscribed, please keep kxra on CC]
>
>
> Heyya,
>
> Anyone play with the linux-libre[1] project? Does the kernel team know
> about this stuff? It seems like we're trying for the same sort of thing
> (100
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 12:18:35AM +0100, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
>
> Ok, if anybody is against I take this responsibility, I can do it, but
> before, let me expose some thoughts & doubts:
>
> * I understand that GSoC projects are those that are technical and
> non-GSoc projects are the non-
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:11:42PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> (2) GSoC
> admins are OK with asking mentors to direct the 500 USD per project to
> the OPW earmark). Otherwise, I'll be happy to pre-approve covering up
> what remains on general Debian funds.
>
The money is given to the mentor
Hola:
Mario:
El Viernes, 18 de Noviembre de 2005 19:02, Roberto C. Sanchez escribió:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 02:37:52PM -0300, Mario A. Sanchez - Sistemas -
Clínica Pergamino S.A. wrote:
> > Que tal tengo la version de debian en 2 DVD.
> >
> > Los DVD bootean bien, pero cuando comienza la ins
Ew... sorry :)
I forgot remove the debian-project mail.
Ana
El Viernes, 18 de Noviembre de 2005 20:18, Ana Guerrero escribió:
> Hola:
>
> Mario:
>
> El Viernes, 18 de Noviembre de 2005 19:02, Roberto C. Sanchez escribió:
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 02:37:52PM -0300, Mario
Dear Project,
I know you all have been working during the last year to improve things in
your "corner" of the project for the next Debian release. I would like to
invite you to communicate to the larger project about what you are working on
through the publicity team.
You can:
- blog about your
Hi,
Lucas sent an email asking people to encourage their 'dream DPL' [1].
I have already encouraged a few people in the last weeks, but when discussing
with them, they all tell me very different things about the DPL role. When
I asked: "What are you expecting the DPL to do?", I got a bunch of diff
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:08:44AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
>
> > Lucas sent an email asking people to encourage their 'dream DPL' [1].
> > I have already encouraged a few people in the last weeks, but when
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 06:15:46PM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
> - get.debian.org
get.debian.org and redirections for every release like get.debian.org/$RELEASE
would be great.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:49:17AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Mehdi Dogguy writes ("Re: Software Freedom Conservancy needs our cash"):
> > On 2015-12-02 02:35, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 6:23 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > >> Indeed. And instead of simply adding blog posts, the pro
Hi,
A bit late to the party, but today I found this article that was published
by the defunct site http://time.debian.net in June 2008:
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Publicity/DebianTimesTeam/PressReleases/GravitationalWaveDebianCluster
Looks like we finally have the proof that Debian helped a l
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 03:37:08PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> In 2005, the body of Debian Developers passed a General Resolution[1]
> requiring
> the creation of a declassification team for the debian-private mailing list.
> For the past ten years, the implementation of this GR has never m
bcc in case they wants to add something.
Ana
----
On 06/18/2017 02:22 AM, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
[snipped header]
> After 26 months of development the Debian project is proud to present
> its new stable version 9 (code name "Stretch"), which will be supported
> for
Estimada Mariana,
Esta lista de correo es en inglés y no se usa para soporte. Por favor,
dirije tus preguntas a https://lists.debian.org/debian-user-spanish/
La versión 3.2.88-1 es probablemente la del kernel, mira el fichero:
/etc/debian_version para ver que versión tienen tus sistemas.
Atte.
Hi Bdale,
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 10:22:23AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> It has been my habit in the lead-up to each stable release to put in a
> burst of work updating the debian-history package. Unfortunately,
> right now I just can't seem to find the enthusiasm for doing so.
>
>
Dear users and contributors,
We would like publishing a special post in bits.d.o for the anniversary of
Debian. The idea is publishing anonymous quotes from Debian users and
developers about what Debian means for you. Please send your quotes ASAP
at ana...@debian.org, Francesca and I will get a
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:57:42AM +0200, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
> Dear users and contributors,
>
> We would like publishing a special post in bits.d.o for the anniversary of
> Debian. The idea is publishing anonymous quotes from Debian users and
> developers about what Debia
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 08:54:30AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> I'm in favour of not posting names but links to the posts that led to
> the ban. That it solves the problem of google-shaming is welcome, but
> marginal to me. The most important thing to me in doing that, is that we
> make it clear tha
65 matches
Mail list logo