On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 01:30:24PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> I'm trying to move a thread from -devel.
>
> Ian Jackson responded [1] to part of a consensus discussion on Git
> recommendations. I had said that I think we recommend against the use
> of non-free services like Github but do
://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140223080943.ga11...@master.debian.org
of the new keys to the weakness of the
1024 bit keys.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140223081228.ga1...@master.debian.org
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 10:23:47AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Bart Martens:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 07:57:43AM +, Marco d'Itri wrote:
gw...@gwolf.org wrote:
So, what do you suggest?
Persuade developers that they should sign the new key of people whose
old key
to confirm that you're talking to the same person
you've met previously and confirm that that is his new key.
Exactly. We should not cut corners when replacing the 1024 bit keys by 4096
ones.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
to meet them in person.
I'm open to that if and only if the new keys have proper transition
statements.
I would never sign new keys based on transition statements.
And if the original signatures were *really* done
carefully
Still never. :-)
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:46:07PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:27:25PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Bart Martens wrote:
I suggest we keep things civil, with respect for the persons involved.
It's
really not up to Debian to harm someone's reputation
.
Approaches I could support :
- post the bans with reasons on debian-private
- or maintain a list of bans with reasons in a text file on a Debian machine
where DDs can read this info.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 09:20:27PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 19:33 +, Bart Martens wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:46:41AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
This led to a philosophical debate about whether bans should be made
public.
Alexander expressed
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:58:34PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Bart,
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 07:33:34PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:46:41AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
This led to a philosophical debate about whether bans should be made
public
not interested in. Messages sent to the wrong lists
happens all the time, also on the public mailing lists. Let's accept some
noise, while allowing anyone to choose where they post their messages. There's
sufficient social control encouraging people to use the better list.
Regards,
Bart
to be completed
before an additional license or license version would be added to the list ?
How to deal with mistakes on the list ? Do we have sufficient volunteers with
sufficient legal knowledge to maintain such list ? Maybe this part should be
dealt with further on debian-legal.
Regards,
Bart Martens
but a statement giving example
compared to other DFSG's
I agree that DFSG #10 is just a list of examples, not really a guideline as
the G in DFSG.
so even I feel it is better to drop DFSG #10.
That is a choice we could make.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ
on the camp of we need/should keep the restricted
logo). I consider this an acceptable compromise.
I second the patch (I was in the camp of put the bottle logo in a museum.) As
Henrique wrote, the patch is an acceptable compromise.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
history or so.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121001104009.gc3...@master.debian.org
will be known as the Debian Maintainer
Keyring team. Changes to the team may be made by the DPL under the
normal rules for delegations.
So the GR text doesn't seem to require a public discussion nor a public
announcement.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
/Linux is documented here:
http://www.debian.org/distrib/
There are also vendors in South Africa listed:
http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/#za
Hope this helps,
Bart Martens
Regards,
PNJ IT Solutions for Vaalpark High School.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 09:22 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
Dear DD's,
I think that Joerg was very reasonable with this message:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2007/10/msg00115.html
The debate that followed doesn't seem to lead to a solution that makes
the existing DM registrations
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 11:04 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 09:55:57AM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
I'm sure that the intentions are good, but Joerg has a point about these
three DM's. Maybe it is better to replace these three DM registrations
in the DM keyring by three
candidates.
and not in the DM keyring maintenance team.
I'm not blaming the DM keyring maintenance team for having a different
view on the liberties that come with being a member of the DM keyring
maintenance team.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
the DM keyring before all documentation and
tools are ready. As long as granting upload rights to non-DD's is done
following the rules of the voted GR.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 14:57 +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The good reasons for requesting the removal of inappropriate additions
to the DM keyring are
Why is it better to introduce more work for the DM Keyring team than
ask a simple apology?
Granting
owned by DD's. Then nobody
can complain about real DM's already being added without following the
rules.
I'm willing to help if you're interested.
http://knars.be/bartm/DM/DM_beta_test_bartm_pubkey.asc
I guess that it's not so difficult to find two other volunteering DD's.
Right ? :)
Regards,
Bart
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 09:55 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 22:38 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
The current 3 people in the DM keyring agreed to be beta testers of the
process, and I don't anticipate us adding more people until everything is
fully implemented and tested.
I'm
to joeyh. :)
IMO the whole GR is just wrong,
Hmm... let's not go into that. :)
but that doesnt mean we should ignore
whats written in it.
Yes, the voted GR must be respected, or we could as well stop voting
GR's.
Regards,
Bart Martens
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 10:06 +0200, walter wrote:
I've
lost a lot of time and plastic trying to download your dvds, cds. All
corrupt. It seems you or somebody else don't want people know about your
distro.
What were the problems you experienced ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
signature.asc
,
Bart Martens
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 15:17 +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
contrary to popular belief and self-delusion, 'stable+backports' is NO
LONGER STABLE.
That is of course true.
the only 'advantage' to using 'stable+backports' over 'stable+some
packages from unstable or testing' is that you don't have
need an update, then you are very welcome
to suggest an update by following the procedure described here [2].
[1]: http://www.debian.org/
[2]:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-upload-stable
Regards,
Bart Martens
signature.asc
Description
in Debian, and focus on the interesting parts: the software.
Regards,
Bart Martens
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 00:40 +, MJ Ray wrote:
the strongest
leader is someone who leads many other strong people to push in the
same direction, building consensus.
Yes, absolutely.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
. If not then I wonder if Debian should do the efforts.
So I'd propose to extend the changelog format
I have not yet studied your proposal, because I want to get some bugs
fixed before etch releases. :)
Regards,
Bart Martens
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 10:38 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 05:39:43PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
He didn't use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address. It was clear to me that
he was speaking as a developer, not as the DPL.
But he has repeatedly suggested when speaking as a
33 matches
Mail list logo
