[amos@eagle.fcts.org: The Greater Franklin County Linux Project, Massachusetts]

2000-03-17 Thread Darren O. Benham
Webmaster gets these from time to time.. and I normally just send them off to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address. However, this one seemed interesting and I thought I'd bring it to the attention of the whole project (or atleast the subset that subscribes to -project). - Forwarded message fr

Volunteer Needed

2000-02-13 Thread Darren O. Benham
Help Wanted: The Debian Webteam seeks a dedicated individual to maintain and coordinate the debian events web section (http://www.debian.org/events/). Knowledge of HTML is a must. Knowledge of wml and perl a plus. Will train. Seriously, if you're interested, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECT

Linux World Expo - NY

2000-01-24 Thread Darren O. Benham
I'm putting together the list of booth workers and hardware suppliers today... If you're going and want to participate at the booth, please join http://benham.net/mailman/listinfo/lwe-ny and read the archives for the questions asked... -- Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also. ==

Re: base dependency warning

1999-12-05 Thread Darren O. Benham
On Sun, Dec 05, 1999 at 10:58:55PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > Darren O. Benham writes: > > Please be aware that console-tools is in base but > > the dependency console-data (>> 1999.08.29-3) > > can not be met with packages in base. > > > > This sho

Re: Submitting bugs ? (Was: Getting rid of section "base" ?)

1999-12-02 Thread Darren O. Benham
Is this, basicly, a part of policy now? On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 12:03:44AM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > Richard Braakman writes: > > On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 11:01:07PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > > > I cannot find a reason currently for its existance, nor can I find a > > > reference to it in

Re: Package Pools (List change, Lalo please notice)

1999-10-27 Thread Darren O. Benham
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 09:55:03PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > Darren O. Benham wrote: > > For the official record, as Debian Project Secretary, I have not received a > > formal proposal and the only message I read on debian-project (I thought) > > said "draft". >