Re: Report from Med@Tel

since quite a long time (at least the twitter counterpart). These days it is not so up-to-date, but generally is. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http

So what? [Was: Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes]

. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: So what? [Was: Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes]

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:49:42PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: Folks, be pragmatic and do required steps to find a common shared idea. Ok, the current announce on d-d-a by Luk seems the right first step :-) Well done. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Re: Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:38:45AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Well, yes and no. I think a freeze every two years is a good idea. I just do not think that we should freeze in 5 months or so. +1 -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ

Re: Results of the Lenny release GR

-- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Social committee proposal

, misses a regular board of voted members for standard governance and has instead a single DPL. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jury (was Re: Two GR concepts for dicussion)

is something better. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jury (was Re: Two GR concepts for dicussion)

On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:50:20AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: A 'probi viri' team should be appinted by voting IMHO, as in the DPL case. s/appinted/appointed/ -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: Bits from the DPL: DSA and buildds and DAM, oh my!

as i have requested. I disagree. RT has a very flexible and complex ACL management which lacks in BTS. So it can be potentially used to to ensure public view of some information without full disclosure. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Why not more 'bits from XXX' on d-d-a?

or RMs? I think all people would appreciate this little increase in transparency of teams' job. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- Please respect the privacy of this mailing list. Some posts may be declassified 3 years after posting as per http://www.debian.org/vote/2005/vote_002 Archive: file

Re: Using money to fund real Debian work

missing the point. Why situation should be better without d-t? Because it is out of the project control? -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DEBIAN OBSOLETE RELEASE

On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 11:36:25AM +0900, Horms wrote: As Etch is currently scheduled for release late in 2006, this makes May 2006 a very likely end date for Woody security. I would say 'optimistically scheduled' instead of 'currently scheduled' :) -- Francesco P. Lovergine