On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:02:53AM +0100, Ansgar wrote:
> the BDS movement, a movement that is uncontroversially seen as
> antisemitic.
Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 09:49:22AM +, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu 26 Dec 2019 at 11:29am -05, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> > One interesting thing about this is that I have often wondered if it
> > would be beneficial to have checks on debian/copyright during the life
> >
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 07:31:11PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> This probably has been floating around for some time. IMO, enough time
> so that we start to discuss $subject.
Why is this a GR and not a policy proposal?
Michael
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:35:55PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh dijo [Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 07:11:14PM -0200]:
On Sat, 08 Nov 2014, Richard Hartmann wrote:
Interpretation is in the eye of the bee holder, but I am considering
to attach this list to my weekly bug
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 06:33:28PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
AIUI, you need to have at least one(?) additional signature on your new
2048+ RSA key on top of your old DSA key, correct?
I meant on top of the signature from your old DSA key.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Hi,
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 08:43:07AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
The Tails project is a Debian-based live system focusing on privacy and
anonymity. For more information about Tails and their relationship with
Debian, see:
https://tails.boum.org/
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 07:49:37PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
Correct. Unfortunately I haven't heard much else either. Discussions
went on on the fsf-collab-discuss list on alioth, but the state of the
art is still that we're waiting for the FSF to refine current freeness
assessment into
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 08:13:29PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
Just out of curiosity: What's their definition of freedom anyway?
You don't know what their definition of freedom is, but continue to
assess their religious views? This doesn't look very useful to me.
I know very well
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 09:59:45PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On ven., 2012-08-10 at 14:01 +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
some binary software forced me into downloading a RedHat flavour, so I
went for Fedora. I found it very easy
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 11:38:01AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Installing(!) an IRC client and diving into the world of IRC is an
investment.
Totally, but please also honor the (huge!) investment by the people
doing first-level support in #debian (both on irc.debian.org and
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 08:35:36PM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
DebConf10 had €59716.21 of income, and €130300.76 of expenses, for a
net loss of €34584.57.
[...]
[dc10-bal] http://rkd.zgib.net/http/debconf/dc10/
JFTR, according to that balance sheet, the income was EUR 95716.21
instead
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 01:04:47PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 05/10/2010 01:50 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote:
Right. It works, but it is an annoying extra step to do. And I had more
than one
customer asking me why Debian is
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 01:05:19PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 05/10/2010 08:33 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Freitag, 7. Mai 2010, Paul Wise wrote:
What makes it problematic to modify the install media (initrd I guess)
you downloaded and add the firmware?
For quite some
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:27:01PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
I would like us to provide non-free firmware blobs that may be
required during installation in tarballs that can be downloaded or -
if this is not possible - be loaded via USB sticks, floppies or
cdroms.
I thought this was
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 10:59:57AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 05/06/2010 07:22 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
2) Having the non-free firmware in the regular CD image sets; firmware
which is not loaded by default, but that can be selectively enabled
by the user, pretty much as users
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:12:55PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 26 avril 2010 à 21:40 +0200, Obey Arthur Liu a écrit :
== Debian High Performance Computing on Clouds ==
by Dominique Belhachemi, mentored by Steffen Moeller
The project paves a way to combine the demands in
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:07:04AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Since a while now, Ana has been doing a great job in providing the
news.debian.net service [1].
Ack, though personally, I see two things (unrelated to the discussion at
hand) which Ana might want to consider:
1. Some
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:41:34PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
At the end some possible changes were proposed:
* Defining On-Topicness more sharply, e.g.
* Packaging Issues which pertain to more than one package
* Non-packaging Development of Debian
* Reconsider CCs
* Maybe
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:34:37AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
What proportion of devel is wnpp email?
Roughly 20%, based on rough statistics over first half of 2009.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:44:14PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Michael Banckmba...@debian.org wrote:
at Debconf9, there was a BoF about the debian-devel list and how we
could possibly make it more attractive.
Was this recorded (I can't find it in the initial
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 03:17:55PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Allowing these logical fallacies to stand, and not refuting
them, lead to a discussion that goes nowhere, or floats off into sub
optimal directions if not scotched in the bud.
Indeed, leaving logical
Hi,
at Debconf9, there was a BoF about the debian-devel list and how we
could possibly make it more attractive.
At first some small research was presented on what other
projects/distributions (mostly Ubuntu, Gentoo, Fedora, OpenSUSE and
GNOME) are doing, the slides are here:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:55:36AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:38:56 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
How does Ubuntu want to do a proper (commercial) support for their packages
if
they don't even have the time/manpower to take care of their bugs? Taking
care
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 11:44:00PM +0200, Ilya Shpan'kov wrote:
I will inform our lawers about your opinion. Really, it have a very big
sense.
I can say, that here in Opera we had discussions about being Free
Software every year. Unfortunately, we have a lot of agreements with
other
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 08:52:10AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
I think it's the job of something like the LSB to ensure a necessary
baseline across distros on which vendors can build.
Well, maybe; however the LSB is *very* baseline, so not very useful.
Besides, it is heavily geared towards
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 08:04:12AM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Yes, but OTOH we strongly support copyleft softwares versus the BSD-
like softwares, because we expect to have back the works and
because we expect to behave as a big community.
No we don't.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
I have been thinking a bit about the proposed syncing of the freeze date
with LTS recently.
I do not think it is a bad thing in general, but I do think a freeze
sync with a 10.04 LTS would be premature.
The other concern I have is lengthening our release cycle to 2 years - I
think this is
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:11:39PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:40:30AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Sune Vuorela wrote:
We also need to coordinate such things with the larger packaging teams
to see wether it fits their schedules and their upstream schedules. For
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:00:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 02:04:34AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Something is definitely wrong here, IMHO.
Maybe it's your assumption or assertion that the only point of NEW is
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:52:59AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
In the former case FTP masters are wasting their time, in the latter
case their role is indeed useful to defend our mirror tenants, but
then copyright reviews must be *intensified*.
I would prefer a more real-time mirroring of
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:13:55PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
1. There is precisely one mail (ITP bug from November) from 2007 in
the lists.d.o archive and he was advocated in January 2008.
I think it would be nice to have svn.d.o/git.d.o commits and replies to
bug reports available as
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:01:40PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
New maintainers usually write info about themselves during a first part of
working with AM, and this info is also included in the AM report.
Yeah, but that might be outdated by the time they actually become
developers; when I
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:58:22PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 23/06/09 at 22:35 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said:
I've been advocating people too early (i.e, I've advocated people so
that they could start NM, while in the meantime, I
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:39:20PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Chris Lamb and Samuel Thibault both applied very late. Much too late.
Before they applied, several people have been wondering why they
weren't DDs yet. I'm not sure why they didn't apply earlier, but the
fact that our NM process
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 09:56:53AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk writes:
sometimes, I look at a issue and think that the correct solution here
is a package split, but I often end up working around it in other
ways, just because of NEW.
In my experience,
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 12:19:31PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
i don't see grounds to stop using the git.debian.net subdomain as i
currently do.
i don't see grounds to stop using the backports.debian.net subdomain as
i currently do.
Well, I do. You are using generic .debian.net domains
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 09:58:29PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Well I don't intend to tweet extensively, but only as a replacement for
real blogging as I'm not up to writing long blog posts.
Luk: what do you think yourself?
I think having a very limited amount of tweets from people that do
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:16:18PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Definitely, written delegations could be really useful to Debian to
clarify prerogatives and responsabilities, and avoid
misunderstandings.
Sorry, but this sounds like micro-managing delegates to me. If you
think sections are
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 08:22:58AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
You're the Secretary. You're supposed to give answers, not speculation. If
the ballot was ambigous, or confusing, it is YOUR responsibility.
It has to be said that at least I am taking YOU personally responsable
for a lot of why
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 07:01:17PM +0100, Michael Goetze wrote:
MJ Ray wrote:
to reduce GRs, having
another way for developers to ask a question that nearly always gets
answered might help.
Such as, say, writing an email to debian-de...@ldo?
Eh, -devel is for technical issues pertaining
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 09:38:56AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
George Danchev danc...@spnet.net writes:
On Saturday 20 December 2008 21:33:27 MJ Ray wrote:
So, people who remain on the debian mailing lists have a poor
understanding of what should appear a good mailing list,
What makes
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 09:56:09PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Secondly, What exactly to these members of the project do, if
they do not vote or upload packages?
They might commit to the webml repository or sent mails to debian-news,
e.g.
Of course, they could just vote as well,
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 05:55:00PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I hate in Ganneff proposal the fact that it just standardize the 6
months delay to be a DD. It's acknowledging that we suck, and trying
nothing to fix the problem. It's unacceptable to me.
Other projects are doing similar; e.g. I
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 09:22:28AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
No, that quote was not made by Sir Stephen Henry Roberts. (If you know
differently, could you please provide a reference?)
Uhm, why do you post in public? It seems to be entirely off-topic.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 08:33:26PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Please post the exact error message you get (if any) when you run
mpg123. It might help to turn off any KDE/Gnome specific sound handling
as they sometimes block the device and may prevent each other from
playing any sounds.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:24:52AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Non-free is there just because the free counterparts aren't optimal. Someday
these will, and non-free will just disappear from Debian :)
Non-free is for GNU documentation.
I think we should consider (post-lenny) splitting up
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 09:00:25AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
I'm disappointed if the docs have been patched quietly to expand the
singular they bug. There's almost no need for it. When reasonably
possible, please phrase things in such a way to avoid assuming gender,
or switch some examples. We
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:35:56AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
But again, most persons in these environments are non-native speakers???
Mabye most persons in these environments are male.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 09:17:20PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
It wasn't my intention at all to hurt someone, so I said things in the
kindest way I could, without getting personal.
If that was the best you could do, that's troubling.
But you have to see both sides of things. When I saw
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 05:16:45PM -0400, Rahul Jain wrote:
As a regular in #debian (on OPN/freenode) for over 5 years and a
contributor to the debian project, one would expect that I would be
treated slightly better by the ops than random newbies.
Quite the contrary, Regulars are held to
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:51:56AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
While Debian Live is really nice, some things could be improved about
it. Each time I wanted to use it, I ran into an issue that required
going to IRC to ask how to work around the problem (the problem was
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:10:41AM +, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:35:02AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
- what are the major changes in the project and our product(s) since
the etch release?
I feel the release team tools are getting improved more and more
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:40:47AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
- what are some pending decisions that have to be made?
Not sure about a decision, but the pending addition of GNU/KFreeBSD to
the archive sounds worthwhile to me (though I don't know the current
state, but I was under the
This is obviously the bikeshed part of DEP0...
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:30:42PM +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Lars Wirzenius, Stefano Zacchiroli and myself are trying to introduce
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 01:18:38PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
I think you'd better look at db.debian.org/machines.cgi to have an idea
of the current status...
I can see the current status fine on jvw's buildd pages: those three arches
only have a single active buildd listed when they're
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 12:23:34AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
On 29/11/2007, Michael Banck wrote:
I believe buildd redundancy does not mean having 2+ active buildds,
but having at least one active buildd who can keep up, plus a possibly
inactive backup buildd who could quickly be made
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:55:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
aj, who'd just like to see some failure analysis / air crash investigation
type conclusions out of this, rather than just foo sucks and
shouldn't upload
One thing we could do is have a seperate report on
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:49:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
or we could disallow the override of = E: errors in lintian, and make
lintian reboot your computer, fill your gpg with /dev/random bits, and
install windows over your Debian if you override such errors.
Are you routinely
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 02:08:41PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
Reform NM: mentor-advocates should teach their applicants and help
them to produce a file demonstrating that they possess all the
required DD skills; the AM should then check for any gaps (temporarily
rejecting if needed) and test
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 03:42:02PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
When a new NM gains upload rights (and becomes a DD), there is a mail
on -newmaint. And it's like that for years.
But not since the beginning of adding DDs to the project, it was
introduced later on. It surely makes a lot
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 01:59:22PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
Beta-testing is good. But granting non-DD's upload rights requires
following the rules of the voted GR.
As I understand it, the people (or maybe aj individually) implementing
DM currently are taking responsiblity for those uploads
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:06:49AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 25-Jun-07, 08:33 (CDT), Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:07:05PM +0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having this problem in unstable for a week now:
I'm sorry, but I don't think
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:01:38PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
For the record, i did ask on #debian-kernel, and got no reply, and when
asked, Bastian Blank did say he didn't know who did it, and Stephan
Gran, and Roland Mas, who are admining alioth, know, but don't want to
say.
Hrm, last time
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:53:48AM -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
Well this is due to Intel's stupidity. They created IA64 when what was
really needed was something like Amd64. Then they realized that amd64
was a better design. They added it to the IA32 line under the name
EM64T (without marketing
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:18:12PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Did you happen to read this [0]?
'Debian is available for different computer architectures - make sure
you are getting images that match your computer! (Most people will need
images for i386, i.e. Intel systems.)'
Of
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 03:11:33AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
ps. it seems Aurelien was 'routing around a problem' with no malicious
intension which runs contrary to the word 'rogue' which was used to
describe his actions.
I didn't say his actions were rogue, I said he setup a rogue
autobuilder,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:03:35PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Aurelien mailed debian-arm, went to #debian-arm, had no response. He
then warn about his intention [1] to run qemu-based autobuilders to fill
the gap due to broken arm buildds. He did that on the open, and got ...
zero answers.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 08:53:11AM +0100, Antonio Lanza wrote:
See http://www.handhelds.org/geeklog/index.php,
Please avoid answering end-user questions on -project, this is not the
right list for this. Either point them at -user or answer privately (or
both).
Thanks,
Michael
--
To
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 07:03:44PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Sun has kindly donated a Fire T2000 machine to Debian. This machine is
based on Sun's new UltraSparc T1 CPU, better known as Niagara [1]. The
CPU has 8 cores, each with 4 threads, yielding 32 threads in total.
Wow, that's
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 10:07:11AM +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
Michael Banck, 2006-11-03 02:27:40 +0100 :
Ubuntu is renaming the Maintainer: header to Original-Maintainer:
and is using their respective development mailing list as
Maintainer: for newly compiled packages for quite a while now
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 11:09:23PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I've had problems with packages of mine living in ubuntu universe two
times already, and that's tiredsome. Especially because one of those
users didn't want to believe that I was not the Ubuntu Maintainer of
that package, since
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 06:40:51AM +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
BTW is there a reason why debian-publicity has the words (dead list)
after it in some of the indices? (e.g. stats page) Just not updated
yet?
Yes, it got revived a couple of months ago, after being dead for years.
Michael
--
This question should be on debian-user.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 09:04:57PM -0700, myrddinbach wrote:
Ive searched around to no avail but Im actually interested in getting an
i386 copy of Debian 2.4.3.
No such version exists.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 08:43:53AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
It would be good, though, especially in order to have some support for
hardware that has entered the market after the last Debian release, if
there would be an outside repository for updated kernel and installer
packages.
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:30:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
he doesn't use the leader@ address even on issues related to his DPL role, as
i well know, so this is no guarantee.
AFAICT, he always signs those mails with DPL in the signature. Plus, at
least in this thread, he did use [EMAIL
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:22:53PM -0400, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
Michael Banck wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:30:21PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
According to Millan,
You seem to not have introduced Mr. Millan until this point, maybe write
his full name and position/involvement
if Canonical decided to do so, I think in the
same way we cannot tell our volunteers how to spend their time to work
on Debian, we cannot tell companies who derivate from us how to spend
their money to work with Debian.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.advogato.org
debian-project is an english list, forwarding to the german support
list.
debian-project ist eine englischsprachige Liste, debian-user-de ist
besser für diese Fragen geeignet.
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 06:35:00PM +0200, Norman Nahrgang wrote:
ich wollte mal fragen was der Debian Strudel bedeutet
from d-i SVN access.
Rather, he decided that, after mediation, he should not be *put back*
into SVN acces against the will of the d-i admins.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 05:13:59PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
[debian-women and most named people trimmed. I believe it's
not wanted there.]
It's not wanted on -project, either. Please discuss with this gentleman
in private if you have the urge to do so.
thanks,
Michael
--
Oracle in general
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 08:15:42AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Now, the remaining question that has me baffled is how you reconcile the
factof waiting for NEW, with the 'vitality' part of your DPL plateform.
Wait, we sent off the ftp-assistant on a two-week vacation in *Mexico*
to relax and gain
themselves and I
think they are the best in place to judge when they need help.
As for the current situation of both ftp-assisstants being on leave,
maybe one of the regular ftp-masters could jump in and process the NEW
queue for the time being? I have CC'd them on this mail.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:56:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
So, three weeks of lost time, and the lack of a neutral and transparent
meditation attempt means this was doomed in the first place,
Maybe it was doomed in the first place, but personally I doubt this
would be the fault of the
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 03:42:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:52:15AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:06:32AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
btw, it seems you violated your `one mail per thread' policy, at least
as far as this thread being on
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 04:55:38PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
If the move is done, the FN channels should be kept open
and the topic should redirect users to OFTC.
It could just live on like it does now.
Then any packages that reference the FN channel should be
updated.
Packages should mention
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 07:25:50PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
On 04/30/2006 05:46 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
Just to prove you wrong: what the hell is Jabber?
It is an Instant Messaging Client.
It is not IRC though, so this point is moot. This thread is about IRC,
_dl_catch_error, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not
defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference in what a problem and
how it{her} to correct?
Debian-project is not the appropriate place for technical issues like
these. Please ask debian-user or file a bug.
thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:25:28AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Could you report such sponsors, so we may take their
sponsorship privileges away?
There's no technical way to do this (yet), as far as I can see.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
.
Also you can probably check the continous contribution through that wiki
page's history quite conveniently (though other means make this possible
as well of course)
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:43:22PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Michael Banck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060412 12:11]:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:25:28AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Could you report such sponsors, so we may take their
sponsorship privileges away?
There's
contributions is really necessary, I
think several months or sustained contributions are alright, where
both measures are up for interpretation depending on the type, quality
and quantity of the contributions.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.advogato.org/person
of discussions to debian-project to enhance debian-devel's
signal-to-noise ratio with respect to development.
thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
.
Please post non-development issues to debian-project next time.
Or rethink whether your issue needs posting at all.
thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 06:06:59AM -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote:
It only affects the contributors, which might not be a problem,
though, as they may quite possibly turn into ex-contributors soon...
Which exactly makes it a problem. I hope we lose no valued contributors
(including you)
and participate if we had our own.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to post their question.
thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
trouble. It is a bit like #debian really, where at
some place most DDs had left the channel to itself, which resulted in a
bad reputation both for the channel and the project.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:44:32PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Sorry to feed again the troll, but I would like to know what is the
rationale behind removing the permissions for Andrew and not for
Raphaël.
This has nothing to do with the technical aspects of Debian development
(too bad the
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:25:07PM +, Dave Holland wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:44:32PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Raphaël has also harmed the project by implicitly
linking it to Ubuntu.
Don't be ridiculous. Ubuntu explicitly acknowledge that they build on
Debian - see
,
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
