violence - take 2

2008-02-04 Thread Patrick Frank
[14:05] * Now talking on #debian-devel [14:05] * Topic for #debian-devel is: [...] [14:05] * Topic for #debian-devel set by Maulkin [14:05] pdy hi [14:05] pdy Enrico, you mention in context of debtags efforts that colaboration with the guys from freshmeat.net is planned/desired. their site seems

Re: violence - take 2

2008-02-04 Thread Patrick Frank
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Get lost, will you? Permanently please. It was transparently visible how you handled your disagreement with Sven Luther. We are all able to see how your destructive handling of that conflict grew out to a huge community problem. People who believe in the good

Re: violence - take 2

2008-02-04 Thread Patrick Frank
Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We did not get a private mail from you also, Bas. Maybe we are so confused because we addressed Luk not you? All will be good, we are quite sure. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: violence - take 2

2008-02-04 Thread Patrick Frank
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AIUI Patrick Frank has threatened legal action against OFTC, so OFTC is currently refusing to serve him. The legal threat is open, because: - network representatives of OFTC abused positions and priviledges in private battles against my person connections

Re: violence - take 2

2008-02-04 Thread Patrick Frank
Before anybody even considers using public defacements like paddy is a troll, lets hunt him you should be aware of context. The context is certain Debian Developers playing the cabal game, not only recently, but starting 3-4 years ago. The situation that started the hunt for the paddy was my

Re: violence - take 2

2008-02-04 Thread Patrick Frank
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] What you post on this list, Luk Claes as reply to my postings is not constructive in any way. The same time you are begging listmasters to ban me from this list, with the intention to hide problems of the Debian project. Please re-read the Debian Social

Re: why privacy is mandatory

2008-02-01 Thread Patrick Frank
Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:46:56PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: On Thu January 31 2008 9:35:08 am Richard Hecker wrote: [#debian-women on irc.oftc.net] is to be an entry point for women to get involved in Debian development, Before somebody even dares to battle male

Re: why privacy is mandatory

2008-02-01 Thread Patrick Frank
Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Speaking of private data, you have published an IRC log without first securing permission from all the participants. Personally, I detest people who do this even on channels where there is no explicit policy forbidding such behavior, so to point out that

Re: why privacy is mandatory

2008-02-01 Thread Patrick Frank
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If it's based on something not statistically significant, is it unreliable? Whether my observations are reliable enough for you to value the point that I try to explain by samples that are valid to me, well, that is not in my hands. [paddy is behind everything

Fwd: What do Open Source Projects need? - part 3

2007-06-08 Thread Patrick Frank
-- Forwarded message -- From: Patrick Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Jun 8, 2007 1:26 PM Subject: Re: What do Open Source Projects need? - part 3 To: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 6/8/07, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And no, Kalle Kivimaa, I dont need proof

Re: What do Open Source Projects need? - part 3

2007-06-08 Thread Patrick Frank
have to work with such sociopaths when it comes to complex technical topics and misunderstandings. -- greetings, Patrick Frank

Re: What do Open Source Projects need? - part 3

2007-06-08 Thread Patrick Frank
. -- greetings, Patrick Frank

Re: Patrick Frank, again

2007-06-08 Thread Patrick Frank
On 6/8/07, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello dear listmasters, What would you do if the list masters would suggest you to see a psychologist as reaction to your second call for hate campaign? -- greetings, Patrick Frank

Re: What do Open Source Projects need? - part 3

2007-06-08 Thread Patrick Frank
On 6/8/07, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay. Now be a good boy, go back to your cage and program. -- greetings, Patrick Frank

Re: What do Open Source Projects need? - part 3

2007-06-08 Thread Patrick Frank
. All feedback is about trollish elements of postings and not about any of the points I make. This is the declaration of bankruptcy of a community. -- greetings, Patrick Frank P.S.: Mark Shuttleworth, you have all my sympathy for recognizing the weakness of the Debian Project early

What do Open Source Projects need? - part 3

2007-06-07 Thread Patrick Frank
try to make. -- greetings, Patrick Frank

What do Open Source Projects need? - 2 Projects need

2007-06-04 Thread Patrick Frank
cant do for the moment. Some people use this thread to change their point of view or they dont. Some people see me as a troll or they dont. I felt the need to contribute my humble opinion regarding a few things that are not alright. And thats it. -- greetings, Patrick Frank

Re: Don't feed the troll

2007-06-04 Thread Patrick Frank
process E-Mails. Your customers or your co-workers might flame you for that. -- greetings, Patrick Frank

Re: What do Open Source Projects need? - 2 Projects need

2007-06-04 Thread Patrick Frank
On 6/4/07, Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attacks without proof are less than worthless, they only make others to ignore your other points. To such a spirit there is nothing more to add. -- greetings, Patrick Frank

Re: Don't feed the troll

2007-06-04 Thread Patrick Frank
On 6/4/07, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It was not my intention to quote a private E-Mail on the list. I will double-check the headers in future. Sorry to offend your privacy. -- greetings, Patrick Frank

What do Open Source Projects need?

2007-06-03 Thread Patrick Frank
, Patrick Frank

Re: What do Open Source Projects need?

2007-06-03 Thread Patrick Frank
of debian developers who are lacking empathy for other people and intuition for conflict situations. -- greetings, Patrick Frank

Re: Please expulse Frans Pop from debian

2007-04-05 Thread Patrick Frank
one who pays for the conflicts. It was the easiest solution to use the kick button once again. But it was not a correct form of conflict management to suspend Sven's DD status and let the other involved people continue as nothing happend. -- greetings, Patrick Frank

what to concider during the election of the DPL

2007-03-19 Thread Patrick Frank
to other Linux distributions. -- greetings, Patrick Frank

Re: Social Committee proposal

2007-01-26 Thread Patrick Frank
respect for others, the Debian project could benefit a lot. And a lot more of its potential could be used. And then - but only then - a Social Committee would make sense. Patrick Frank, a GNU/Debian user who cares