Re: Creating a Debian Spending proposals and discussion mailing list

2021-04-19 Thread Phil Morrell
/04/msg1.html On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 10:14:50PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sun, 04 Apr 2021, Phil Morrell wrote: > > Please keep in mind that I'm proposing this list purely as a practical > > experiment, it does nothing that can't already be done elsewhere, and if >

Re: Creating a Debian Spending proposals and discussion mailing list

2021-04-04 Thread Phil Morrell
ging work like QA. Even assuming the initiative accidentally ends up solely donating to other existing projects, provided they benefit Debian I'd count that as successful - a contra policy guidance or GR could also be proposed if it becomes excessive. > On Fri, 02 Apr 2021, Phil Morrell wrote:

Creating a Debian Spending proposals and discussion mailing list

2021-04-02 Thread Phil Morrell
months of their allocation they wish to spend on a project. I could include the total in the email to DPL, or feedback to the list that a project has reached 50% funding and needs more Seconders, or if they've exceeded the budget just include them in the signatories with a sum of 0. -- Phil Morrell (emorrp1) signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: GR proposal: mandating VcsGit and VcsBrowser for all packages, using the "gbp patches unapplied" layout, and maybe also mandating hosted on Salsa

2019-07-24 Thread Phil Morrell
ing contractors and anyone's workflow which relies on e.g. cutting corners when out of sight. Ultimately, assume a maintainer, or a whole team of uploaders gets hit by a bus, how can we specify the definition of a "package" such that other DDs can quickly and easily take up future