On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:56:34PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> Not true, if someone identifies with fascist doctrine, even if they keep
> those views off of the project channels, then they are not welcome here,
> no matter where they engaged in those kind of activities.
Would you care to put
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 06:22:57PM -0600, Eldon Koyle wrote:
> I have noticed a pattern on Debian lists where we see:
>
> 1) a polarizing issue is brought up on the list
>
> 1a) (optional) there is some discussion with a few interesting points
>
> 2) people start arguing (useful debate
as I am aware, of threatening any DD's membership on
account of anti-cabalism or other dissent. Andreas is right.
--
Thaddeus H. Black
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
not say. Not that we shouldn't fix the
filibuster flaw; we should. But one might not impute purer motives or
better judgment to a hypothetical future DAM than to a hypothetical
filibustering DD. Both Constitutional security flaws, and others, stand
to be fixed.)
--
Thaddeus H. Black
508 Nellie's Cave
of the Project.
--
Thaddeus H. Black
508 Nellie's Cave Road
Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, USA
+1 540 961 0920, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Steve Langasek wrote:
I believe you misspelled demonization and distracting...
Some august Developers apparently stand above criticism.
I do not. I have added the words you suggest to
my ~/.ispell_default. Thanks.
--
Thad Black
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
Good luck, Leader. Best wishes from the loyal opposition. Active,
unstinting cooperation from me during the year, you can depend on.
--
Thaddeus H. Black
508 Nellie's Cave Road
Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, USA
+1 540 961 0920, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital
to
the lists, but whose opinion I particularly
respect, had voted differently; and
(4) changed my vote to more nearly resemble his.
This is a fine form of persuasion without excessive list
noise. Well done.
--
Thaddeus H. Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
, if this interests you, there it is. Phone me if
you like.
--
Thaddeus H. Black
508 Nellie's Cave Road
Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, USA
+1 540 961 0920, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpXr2wOC5QKJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
say?
I lack past experience in media relations. I don't
really know what to say. I don't think that, Get a
clue, dude would help. Suggestions?
--
Thaddeus H. Black
508 Nellie's Cave Road
Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, USA
+1 540 961 0920, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpV3H4On17uW.pgp
Several of you work closely with GNU people. A question
for you. Is the FSF a body like the IETF, W3C or Debian
in which stakeholders make reasonably collaborative
policy decisions together? Or is FSF policy more or
less another name for the views of Richard M.
Stallman? (Or does the reality
nevertheless.
--
Thaddeus H. Black
508 Nellie's Cave Road
Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, USA
+1 540 961 0920, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(I would quietly ask that this post not be referenced in
the Weekly News. The Weekly News is great and has the
honorable right to reference anything it sees fit
My overly clever rhetoric started an unintended
quarrel with good free-software people who are
my friends not my foes. I ask their pardon. A
simpler statement from me would have sufficed.
Branden said it better than I did. He wrote,
By adopting a milquetoast approach we do the
Mozilla
Matthew's report is interesting and appreciated.
Some companies cannot seem to restrain
themselves from stirring the mud in the license
swamp, can they? Like three-year-old boys, they
just love to stir that mud.
Some companies feel that various licenses were
genuine efforts to be DFSG free
14 matches
Mail list logo
