Hi.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
at Wed, 7 Jun 2000 12:39:59 -0700,
on Re: A User's View on Non-Free,
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 03:02:39PM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote:
> > I disagree. While debian-project exist
Buddha Buck wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David N. Welton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ...
> >
> > There is actually a list for these kinds of meta-project discussions:
> > debian-project. It was lame for the origianl poster not to post
> > there, in my opinion.
>
> I disagr
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 03:02:39PM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote:
> I disagree. While debian-project exists, it isn't known to every developer
> or other
> interested party (like myself). A proposal to do something as broadreaching
> as amending
> the Social Contract needs to be discussed in as wide a
> -Original Message-
> From: David N. Welton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 2:44 PM
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: A User's View on Non-Free
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 08:41:02PM +0200, Igor Mozetic wrote:
4 matches
Mail list logo