On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Right. It's a goal for most of them. Debian-BR-CDD is going to start
to upload their package in next weeks and we've done a nice bunch of
clean up to allow it to be more acceptable for Debian. We'll probably
don't meet this goa
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> I wholeheartedly agree with Otavio.
>
> I do as well.
>
>> As I see it, Debian-edu (Skolelinux) has an intend of _becoming_ a CDD -
>> while their products re
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I wholeheartedly agree with Otavio.
I do as well.
As I see it, Debian-edu (Skolelinux) has an intend of _becoming_ a CDD -
while their products released so far are _derived_ from Debian.
I do not share this view with all current members of
Otavio Salvador skrev:
> Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The reality is, while Debian Edu is a CDD not all parts of it are part of
>> Debian etch.
> My concept of CDD requires only Debian archive packages. So every
> distro that modifies packages (eve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday 13 October 2007 09:26, Frans Pop wrote:
>> AFAIK they aim to be a CDD, but currently they have a number of modified
>> packages, [...]
>> They also have
Hi,
On Saturday 13 October 2007 09:26, Frans Pop wrote:
> AFAIK they aim to be a CDD, but currently they have a number of modified
> packages, [...]
> They also have some minor customizations of the installation system (mainly
> some defaults) and custom tasks for tasksel.
I'd s
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 13 October 2007, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> > Congratulations, but is this a CDD?
>
> AFAIK they aim to be a CDD, but currently they have a number of modified
> packages, mainly because (program) translations for Dzongkha are not (yet)
> ava
On Saturday 13 October 2007, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> Congratulations, but is this a CDD?
AFAIK they aim to be a CDD, but currently they have a number of modified
packages, mainly because (program) translations for Dzongkha are not (yet)
available in Debian Etch.
They also have some mi
(please keep me CC'ed to answers, I'm not subscribed to
-project. Thanks to Paul Wise for pointing me to this thread)
Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> Congratulations, but is this a CDD? If not, what's the canonical
> name? DDL, Dzongkha Linux, Dzongkha Debian GNU/Linux
The na
Congratulations, but is this a CDD? If not, what's the canonical name?
DDL, Dzonghka Linux, Dzonghka Debian GNU/Linux?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am 2007-04-24 19:05:47, schrieb Luis Matos:
> > My CD provides ALL packages for the installation of Office-Workstations
> > and required server (postgresql, apache, nfs, samba, cups, courier...)
>
> humm ... would you like to share?
I create the CD's per customer and currently I am recreating the
se within small and mid-sized companies.
>
> I am Debian GNU/Linux Consultant in Strasbourg/Frace and using my own
> CDD for my cusomers which is a BUSINESS equivalent for Skolelinux
> .
>
> My CD provides ALL packages for the installation of Office-Workstations
> and requir
se within small and mid-sized companies.
>
> I am Debian GNU/Linux Consultant in Strasbourg/Frace and using my own
> CDD for my cusomers which is a BUSINESS equivalent for Skolelinux
> .
>
> My CD provides ALL packages for the installation of Office-Workstations
> and require
I see problems appear with the
> people
> that use it. These problem appear because no distribution is really focused on
> business use within small and mid-sized companies.
I am Debian GNU/Linux Consultant in Strasbourg/Frace and using my own
CDD for my cusomers which is a BUSINESS equivale
fy Debian
for business use. And I think the best way to start that is by starting
this CDD. See,
installing Debian is one, but the system then still has to be
configured. I'm talking here about for example SMB/LDAP authentication.
Centralised installation of packages. Asterisk or Op
Le Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 04:07:10PM +0100, Luis Matos a écrit :
>
> A cdd would be good for some first testing, but having it included in
> debian would be great.
Hi,
Actually, a CDD *is* included in Debian. I suggest to you and Arjan to
have a look at the following page:
http://wiki.d
users
> instead
> of a commercial base. The open source/GPL/DSC concept works for individuals,
> so
> why it wouldn't/couldn't work for businesses?
I think the majoraty of debian's instalations are in corportive
environments, server And/or desktops. So i think that debi
Hi,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-18 15:26]:
> I have a small company, that provides legal services. About 6 months ago (I
> use
> linux for more than 8 years already) all desktops are running Linux now.
And you still use DOS linebreaks?
SCNR
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde
al with this project is to create a CDD that provides it's users with the
tools they need to easily install and use the things a small and mid-sized
business needs in their working environment. This goes for both server and
desktop tasks. A small and mid-sized company often doesn't have a
19 matches
Mail list logo
