Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

Hi, Here is the draft which had been proposed by Ian a long time ago, and seemed accepted by the Debian staff: Do yu need some special formatting/layout? iirc some small typo/wording were changed, but the essential is here. Regards === draft letter === RE DEBIAN - EUROPEAN ARTICLE NUMBER

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

* Martin Michlmayr [2018-07-07 00:52]: > I'm happy for SPI to sign this. Can you please prepare the official > letter? Any update on this? -- Martin Michlmayr https://www.cyrius.com/

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

* Ian Jackson [2018-04-19 14:53]: > > Thanks for running with this. I am happy with the content and with > > your name at the bottom. > I will wait a bit now to see what SPI says. I'm happy for SPI to sign this. Can you please prepare the official letter? (Sorry for the delay.) -- Martin

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

* Ian Jackson [2018-05-24 18:39]: > Martin, sorry to press you, but when should we expect to hear from > SPI, please ? Or should we keep polling every few weeks ? I'm sorry for the delay. I was close on catching up on my TODO list when I wrote my last email but

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

MENGUAL Jean-Philippe writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up"): > Le 03/05/2018 à 13:30, Ian Jackson a écrit : > > Martin Michlmayr writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI > > heads-up"): > >>> Ian Jackso

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

Hi, Le 03/05/2018 à 13:30, Ian Jackson a écrit : > Martin Michlmayr writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI > heads-up"): >>> Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> [2018-05-02 16:42]: >>>> I'll discuss with the SPI board. >

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

Martin Michlmayr writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up"): > > Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> [2018-05-02 16:42]: > > > I'll discuss with the SPI board. > > > > When should we expect to hear from you ? > &g

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

* Ian Jackson [2018-05-02 16:42]: > > I'll discuss with the SPI board. > > When should we expect to hear from you ? I'm not sure. I had a deadline a few days ago and I'm just catching up on my TODO list. How urgent is this? -- Martin Michlmayr

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

Martin Michlmayr writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up"): > I'll discuss with the SPI board. When should we expect to hear from you ? Thanks, Ian. -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. If I emailed

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

Alvaro Herrera writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up"): > Ian Jackson wrote: > > There's one bugfix: "the the" should read "the". > > No bugfix for "anticpate" or "predjudice"? Thanks for the proofr

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

Ian Jackson wrote: > That's right. For your convenience my mail > Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:53:34 +0100 > quoted the thing again. > There's one bugfix: "the the" should read "the". No bugfix for "anticpate" or "predjudice"? (I also wonder about "Nor do ... do so on Debian's behalf". Looks

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

Ian, > > Thanks for running with this. I am happy with the content and with > > your name at the bottom. > > > > (Happy to sign it too if that's needed or helpful for whatever > > reason.) > > It might make it more convincing if you were to sign it, indeed. It's likely to save a pointless

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

* Ian Jackson [2018-04-19 16:38]: > > Just to make sure we're on the same page, you're talking about the > > draft letter you posted 31 Aug 2017 15:19:18. There have been no > > changes since that post, right? > > That's right. For your convenience my mail >

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

Martin Michlmayr writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up"): > Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> [2018-04-19 13:53]: > > SPI: are you willing to have the SPI Secretary sign this letter ? If > > Just to make sure we're on the

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

* Ian Jackson [2018-04-19 13:53]: > SPI: are you willing to have the SPI Secretary sign this letter ? If Just to make sure we're on the same page, you're talking about the draft letter you posted 31 Aug 2017 15:19:18. There have been no changes since that post,

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

Chris Lamb writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up"): > Hi Ian, > > Chris, are you now content ? Would you be happy with me putting > > my name on the bottom ofthis letter ? > > Thanks for running with this. I am happy with the content and

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

Hi Ian, > Chris, are you now content ? Would you be happy with me putting > my name on the bottom ofthis letter ? Thanks for running with this. I am happy with the content and with your name at the bottom. (Happy to sign it too if that's needed or helpful for whatever reason.) Best wishes,

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

Ian Jackson writes ("Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up"): > We (Debian, me specifically) are about to ask Free Software > Conservancy for legal advice - specifically whether there is anything > wrong with this proposed letter. I am picking this up again now

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

Ian Jackson wrote: > Hi. > > Summary: > > Debian would like to sign, jointly with SPI, a letter stating that we > do not intend to apply for EANs. A draft of the letter is below. > > > Process: > > We (Debian, me specifically) are about to ask Free Software > Conservancy for legal advice -

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

On 08/31/2017 11:32 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: Joshua D. Drake writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up"): On 08/31/2017 07:19 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: Debian would like to sign, jointly with SPI, a letter stating that we do not intend to apply for EANs

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

Joshua D. Drake writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up"): > On 08/31/2017 07:19 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Debian would like to sign, jointly with SPI, a letter stating that we > > do not intend to apply for EANs. A draft of the letter is belo

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

On 08/31/2017 07:19 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: Hi. Summary: Debian would like to sign, jointly with SPI, a letter stating that we do not intend to apply for EANs. A draft of the letter is below. The vendor should apply for their own EANs. If Debian/SPI applies for them it will provide a

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

Guillem Jover writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up"): > I'm not sure whether this is splitting hairs, but wouldn't issuing a > letter stating those 2 years make any similar request in the near > future that demands a 2 years span, require rei

Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

Hi! On Thu, 2017-08-31 at 15:19:18 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Summary: > > Debian would like to sign, jointly with SPI, a letter stating that we > do not intend to apply for EANs. A draft of the letter is below. > === draft letter === […] >4. Debian do not anticpate this situation

Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up

Hi. Summary: Debian would like to sign, jointly with SPI, a letter stating that we do not intend to apply for EANs. A draft of the letter is below. Process: We (Debian, me specifically) are about to ask Free Software Conservancy for legal advice - specifically whether there is anything wrong