El jue, 21-06-2007 a las 21:40 +0200, Robert Millan escribió:
I believe our silence says it all, no? If they want to donate us money
for no 'carte blanche' back good,
Their donations are welcome, their deals aren't. In fact, we could even lose
our permission to use GPLv3 software if we
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 11:03:03AM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
El jue, 21-06-2007 a las 21:40 +0200, Robert Millan escribió:
I believe our silence says it all, no? If they want to donate us money
for no 'carte blanche' back good,
Their donations are
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007, Robert Millan wrote:
Since every GNU/Linux distributor seems to be positioning with regards to
possible patent deals with Microsoft, I thought we could do the same.
Actually, it's totally unthinkable that a non-profit organization could do
this kind of deal, in which
Hi!
* Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070621 09:40]:
Actually, it's totally unthinkable that a non-profit organization could do
this kind of deal, in which Microsoft pays you to perform hara-kiri by
losing the right to distribute GPLv3 software. This is exactly what a
positioning
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 03:57:39PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
I would to see some kind of statement, too.
How about To the best of our knowledge, Debian is free of patent
encumberance. We will, however, happily accept patent indeminfications
for our users, upstream developers, and derived
Robert Millan wrote:
Hi,
Since every GNU/Linux distributor seems to be positioning with regards to
possible patent deals with Microsoft, I thought we could do the same.
Actually, it's totally unthinkable that a non-profit organization could do
this kind of deal, in which Microsoft pays
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 06:08:16PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 6/20/07, Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Since every GNU/Linux distributor seems to be positioning with regards to
possible patent deals with Microsoft, I thought we could do the same.
Actually, it's totally
* Robert Millan:
Since every GNU/Linux distributor seems to be positioning with regards to
possible patent deals with Microsoft, I thought we could do the same.
The patent deals between Microsoft and Linux vendors that have been
announced so far deal with issues that do not seem particularly
On to, 2007-06-21 at 15:25 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
The patent deals between Microsoft and Linux vendors that have been
announced so far deal with issues that do not seem particularly
relevant for the Debian project (except for the promise not to sue
some people).
Hey, that's an excellent
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 06:08:16PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 6/20/07, Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Since every GNU/Linux distributor seems to be positioning with regards to
possible patent deals with Microsoft, I thought we could do the same.
Actually, it's totally
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 03:50:21AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 06:08:16PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 6/20/07, Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Since every GNU/Linux distributor seems to be positioning with regards to
possible patent deals with
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 03:25:32PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
If Microsoft promises not to sue us, our mirror operators, and or end
users, for no compensation except a joint press release (we haven't
got much more we can offer anyway), it would be very stupid to reject
such a deal.
A
Hi,
Since every GNU/Linux distributor seems to be positioning with regards to
possible patent deals with Microsoft, I thought we could do the same.
Actually, it's totally unthinkable that a non-profit organization could do
this kind of deal, in which Microsoft pays you to perform hara-kiri by
On 6/20/07, Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Since every GNU/Linux distributor seems to be positioning with regards to
possible patent deals with Microsoft, I thought we could do the same.
Actually, it's totally unthinkable that a non-profit organization could do
this kind of deal,
14 matches
Mail list logo
