The people who like my blog can add it to their feed readers directly.
I believe I've followed the rules for PD, but there's no point
I believe you've followed the rules as well. As you mentioned on your
blog, planet is for active participants in Debian, not for posts about
Debian only. The
Bastian Venthur wrote:
Why so complicated? Isn't it easier to divide the content
of planet into something like personal and technical
Some people think pdo needs adjusting, some don't. The
solution Lars proposed leaves pdo as it is (which satisfies
the latter camp, which includes me).
--
Jon
Hi!
* Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070808 18:44]:
I've heard from people who really like reading my blog posts on Planet
Debian, and people who really hate them.
[..]
So, I've removed the feed. Old posts should roll off the end in a day or
two, or if there's some sense of urgency, I
* Alexander Schmehl [Thu, 09 Aug 2007 10:40:35 +0200]:
* Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070808 18:44]:
I've heard from people who really like reading my blog posts on Planet
Debian, and people who really hate them.
[..]
So, I've removed the feed. Old posts should roll off the end in a
OK, so, based on this feedback, I've reënabled the feed, and I'm
unlikely to remove it again without good reason.
-Evan
--
Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 05:54:12PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Did we ever agree a policy about what's acceptable/reasonable for
blog feeds linked from planet.d.o?
No. And personally, I believe that's a good thing. To me, Planet Debian
is about people, not technology. The fact that it just
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:26:52AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
This is Planet Debian so it should be mainly about Debian.
I disagree. A blog is what a person thinks about; a planet is an
aggregation of blogs of people who have one particular thing in common.
It's clear from the above that
Lars Wirzenius liw at liw.iki.fi writes:
It strikes me, though, that if there's interest, setting up an
pure.debian.net with feeds strictly restricted to those that discuss
Debian matters only, should be pretty easy. Anybody interested in
subscribing to it?
I think that is a great idea. I
On 08.08.2007 07:33 schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
It strikes me, though, that if there's interest, setting up an
pure.debian.net with feeds strictly restricted to those that discuss
Debian matters only, should be pretty easy. Anybody interested in
subscribing to it?
Why so complicated? Isn't it
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 14:43 +, Jon Dowland wrote:
I think that is a great idea. I wouldn't subscribe to it, under the assumption
that p.d.o would be effectively a superset of the content, but it would at
least
satisfy those who are not interested in non-technical postings.
And who are
Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
Why so complicated? Isn't it easier to divide the content of planet into
something like personal and technical [...]
personal / technical may be a different split to debian / other - some
of Ian Murdock's posts are technical without being directly
MJ Ray wrote:
Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
Why so complicated? Isn't it easier to divide the content of planet into
something like personal and technical [...]
personal / technical may be a different split to debian / other - some
of Ian Murdock's posts are technical
On to, 2007-08-09 at 10:34 -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 14:43 +, Jon Dowland wrote:
I think that is a great idea. I wouldn't subscribe to it, under the
assumption
that p.d.o would be effectively a superset of the content, but it would at
least
satisfy
On to, 2007-08-09 at 14:43 +, Jon Dowland wrote:
I think that is a great idea. I wouldn't subscribe to it, under the assumption
that p.d.o would be effectively a superset of the content, but it would at
least
satisfy those who are not interested in non-technical postings.
That's assuming
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 07:28:41PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On to, 2007-08-09 at 14:43 +, Jon Dowland wrote:
I think that is a great idea. I wouldn't subscribe to it, under the
assumption
that p.d.o would be effectively a superset of the content, but it would at
least
satisfy
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:33:22 +, Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It strikes me, though, that if there's interest, setting up an
pure.debian.net with feeds strictly restricted to those that discuss
Debian matters only, should be pretty easy. Anybody interested in
subscribing to it?
On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 14:16:05 -0300, Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did we ever agree a policy about what's acceptable/reasonable for
blog feeds linked from planet.d.o? I'm very tempted to disable Ian
Murdock's Solaris propaganda, for
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:26:55PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007, Joey Hess wrote:
Ian could take up pig farming and blog about nothing else, and I'd still
consider his posts on topic for Planet Debian. Whether he likes it or not,
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:20:30AM -0400, Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:26:55PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007, Joey Hess wrote:
Ian could take up pig farming and blog about nothing else, and I'd still
consider his posts on topic for
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure there's a planet wikipedia to suit your needs. This is Planet
Debian so it should be mainly about Debian. Of course Debian contributors
can speak about something else from time to time, but when it's 60% (or
whatever high percentage we could
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seriously, when there's something that is not interesting to me on
planet debian, I just don't read it. Is it that difficult to not read ?
Actually, it's harder than it could be. Can anyone see how to add
alterslash.org-style Skip links to the top of each
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Waw, there are still people not using feed agregators these days ?
Yep. (There are even still people using Windows 95.)
Also, Planet Debian is a type of feed aggregator... if you can see how
to do it easily, go for it instead of being all mysterious. I'm
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:32:43AM +0100, MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seriously, when there's something that is not interesting to me on
planet debian, I just don't read it. Is it that difficult to not read ?
Actually, it's harder than it could be.
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:07:41AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 14:16:05 -0300, Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did we ever agree a policy about what's acceptable/reasonable for
blog feeds linked from planet.d.o? I'm
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But yes, I do think that we should at least try to keep planet without
much noise otherwise it'll get boring to read and lose its meaning.
After reading this thread I changed my mind. I now agree that it's not
the case.
--
O T A V I OS A
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 08:26 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
BTW CCing Evan to let him know.
Thanks, Raphael.
I've heard from people who really like reading my blog posts on Planet
Debian, and people who really hate them.
The people who like my blog can add it to their feed readers directly.
I
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 08:26 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
This is Planet Debian so it should be mainly about Debian.
I'm sorry for disagreeing.
This is Planet Debian, so it should be mainly about Debian Developers
(or contributors, people making Debian) whether they like to write and
blog
On 11101 March 1977, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Did we ever agree a policy about what's acceptable/reasonable for
blog feeds linked from planet.d.o? I'm very tempted to disable Ian
Murdock's Solaris propaganda, for example...
Thoughts?
Without looking at this issue - people can already
Re: Joerg Jaspert 2007-08-07 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Im not sure why this isnt yet integrated into Debian, afaik Myon tried
to do that already with Mako, but I dont know why it didnt
happen. CC-ing both, hoping we get that into official planet soon. :)
I never got around to talk to Mako about that -
I'm not sure why I seem to keep falling into the role of defending Ian
being on planet Debian, but then I don't really understand why people
keep trying to remove him for the most minor infractions[1].
Otavio Salvador wrote:
I agree on disabling his blog since it has nothing related to Debian
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007, Joey Hess wrote:
Ian could take up pig farming and blog about nothing else, and I'd still
consider his posts on topic for Planet Debian. Whether he likes it or not,
he's inextricably linked with Debian.
Ack. I'd rather question the need to have Evan Prodromou's blog who is
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 09:20:55PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
On Monday 06 August 2007 1:28:20 pm Otavio Salvador wrote:
But yes, I do think that we should at least try to keep planet without
much noise otherwise it'll get boring to read and lose its meaning.
Actually, I don't read Planet
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 09:20:55PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
I read Planet Debian for the *non-Debian* posts. What somebody's apartment
in Japan looks like, what the trip to Berlin was like, etc. Maybe what
their Debian development area looks like...
It's good to get to know our fellow
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:26:55PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007, Joey Hess wrote:
Ian could take up pig farming and blog about nothing else, and I'd still
consider his posts on topic for Planet Debian. Whether he likes it or not,
he's inextricably linked with Debian.
On ke, 2007-08-08 at 07:24 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 09:20:55PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
I read Planet Debian for the *non-Debian* posts. What somebody's apartment
in Japan looks like, what the trip to Berlin was like, etc. Maybe what
their Debian
David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly, I was only meaning that the only apparent requirement (or
wannabe policy) is being a Debian development collaborator.
and posting in English.
However, I feel there have been some nasty unsubscriptions before.
Why not ask Ian Murdock by
Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did we ever agree a policy about what's acceptable/reasonable for
blog feeds linked from planet.d.o? I'm very tempted to disable Ian
Murdock's Solaris propaganda, for example...
Thoughts?
I agree on disabling his blog since it has nothing related to
Steve McIntyre dijo [Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 05:54:12PM +0100]:
Did we ever agree a policy about what's acceptable/reasonable for
blog feeds linked from planet.d.o? I'm very tempted to disable Ian
Murdock's Solaris propaganda, for example...
Thoughts?
I see the planet as just the collection of
Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve McIntyre dijo [Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 05:54:12PM +0100]:
Did we ever agree a policy about what's acceptable/reasonable for
blog feeds linked from planet.d.o? I'm very tempted to disable Ian
Murdock's Solaris propaganda, for example...
Thoughts?
I
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Maybe we might contact him and ask him to set the feed for a proper
tag or something so planet won't get all his posts. That would be a
better solution.
I did when this thread started; I didn't Cc: this list when I did
because I found some
On Monday 06 August 2007 1:28:20 pm Otavio Salvador wrote:
Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But then again: Ian Murdock is there because he is the Debian founder,
right? I do not know if nowadays he is in any actual way _related to_
Debian. Yes, not all Planet members are DDs (nor
Did we ever agree a policy about what's acceptable/reasonable for
blog feeds linked from planet.d.o? I'm very tempted to disable Ian
Murdock's Solaris propaganda, for example...
Thoughts?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You lock the door
And
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 17:54 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Did we ever agree a policy about what's acceptable/reasonable for
blog feeds linked from planet.d.o? I'm very tempted to disable Ian
Murdock's Solaris propaganda, for example...
I don't think there's no policy.
Rumors say that only
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 05:54:12PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Did we ever agree a policy about what's acceptable/reasonable for
blog feeds linked from planet.d.o? I'm very tempted to disable Ian
Murdock's Solaris propaganda, for example...
Well, maybe in 2 or 3 years he'll be on-topic, no
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 04:22:44PM -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 17:54 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Did we ever agree a policy about what's acceptable/reasonable for
blog feeds linked from planet.d.o? I'm very tempted to disable Ian
Murdock's Solaris propaganda, for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did we ever agree a policy about what's acceptable/reasonable for
blog feeds linked from planet.d.o? I'm very tempted to disable Ian
Murdock's Solaris propaganda, for example...
Thoughts?
His blog is way more interesting than some other people's blogs which
apparently
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 00:50 +0100, Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
Personally I think it's often rather interesting if a Debian
collaborator writes about non-Debian things. The collaborative other
interests of all of them is a curious picture and often tells
something about other (interesting) free
47 matches
Mail list logo
