On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:21:39AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:39:35PM +, Joel Baker wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 01:46:00PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 03:32:56PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > > In this case, wouldn't making th
* Adam Heath:
> That's not how it works. You can't create a new place for those who
> do work to check for things to do. That'll just increase their
> load.
You probably can expect a few helping hands to get rid of misdirected
requests. Maybe this could compensate for the increased load?
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:39:35PM +, Joel Baker wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 01:46:00PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 03:32:56PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > In this case, wouldn't making the appropriate admin(s) the owner of
> > > the pseudo package make it s
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 01:46:00PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 03:32:56PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Adam Heath wrote:
> > > On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > > > I therefore propose to create a pseudo bug packages for "mail"
> > >
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 03:32:56PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > > I therefore propose to create a pseudo bug packages for "mail"
> > > issues (and/or maybe one for general "admin" topics) like the
> > > ex
Hello
On 2004-09-24 Colin Watson wrote:
> > On 2004-09-24 07:43:58 +0100 Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >I therefore propose to create a pseudo bug packages for "mail" issues
> > >(and/or maybe one for general "admin" topics) like the existing
> > >"lists.debian.org" or "www.debi
Hello Adam
On 2004-09-24 Adam Heath wrote:
> > I therefore propose to create a pseudo bug packages for "mail" issues
> > (and/or maybe one for general "admin" topics) like the existing
> > "lists.debian.org" or"www.debian.org".
> >
> > This would surely not a way to make them act faster but a way
On 2004-09-24 18:06:47 +0100 Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Get those who would supposedly benefit from this to agree. However,
if they
prefer the current way of doing things, you can't force it down their
throat.
How? Emails to admin addresses seem to go unanswered and we can't even
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > I therefore propose to create a pseudo bug packages for "mail"
> > issues (and/or maybe one for general "admin" topics) like the
> > existing "lists.debian.org" or "www.debian.org".
>
> That's not how it wor
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Hello
>
> I got the feeling that starting a discussion Cc'd to debian-admin
> is senseless as they seem too busy to answer.
> (See current mega-threads in debian-private that could have easily
> ended by a single definite statement by the admins)
>
>
On 2004-09-24 12:05:57 +0100 Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so I thought that the project meta package is also more for
organisatorical
problems or things that concerns the project leader and not for
specific
problems with some mail server configuration...
The pseudo-package is
Hello
On 2004-09-24 MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-09-24 07:43:58 +0100 Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I therefore propose to create a pseudo bug packages for "mail" issues
> > (and/or maybe one for general "admin" topics) like the existing
> > "lists.debian.org" or "www.debian.org".
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 10:46:12AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-09-24 07:43:58 +0100 Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I therefore propose to create a pseudo bug packages for "mail" issues
> >(and/or maybe one for general "admin" topics) like the existing
> >"lists.debian.org" or "w
On 2004-09-24 07:43:58 +0100 Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I therefore propose to create a pseudo bug packages for "mail" issues
(and/or
maybe one for general "admin" topics) like the existing
"lists.debian.org" or
"www.debian.org".
Probably a good first step. I would suggest
Hello
I got the feeling that starting a discussion Cc'd to debian-admin
is senseless as they seem too busy to answer.
(See current mega-threads in debian-private that could have easily
ended by a single definite statement by the admins)
I therefore propose to create a pseudo bug packages for "mai
15 matches
Mail list logo
