Re: A User's View on Non-Free

Hi. In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, at Wed, 7 Jun 2000 12:39:59 -0700, on Re: A User's View on Non-Free, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 03:02:39PM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote: > > I disagree. While debian-project exist

Re: A User's View on Non-Free

Buddha Buck wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: David N. Welton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ... > > > > There is actually a list for these kinds of meta-project discussions: > > debian-project. It was lame for the origianl poster not to post > > there, in my opinion. > > I disagr

Re: A User's View on Non-Free

On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 03:02:39PM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote: > I disagree. While debian-project exists, it isn't known to every developer > or other > interested party (like myself). A proposal to do something as broadreaching > as amending > the Social Contract needs to be discussed in as wide a

RE: A User's View on Non-Free

> -Original Message- > From: David N. Welton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 2:44 PM > To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: A User's View on Non-Free > > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 08:41:02PM +0200, Igor Mozetic wrote: