On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
Randomly selected juries avoid the "cabal" problem -- it's transparent
who gets involved, it's not limited to some people, it's not
the same people all the time, and it's a bit easier to deal with
(perceived/claimed/whatever) conflicts of interest.
May
On Friday 01 June 2007 14:06, Sam Hocevar wrote:
>I'd prefer we didn't use the word "punishment", because punishing is
> certainly not what Debian should do; Debian needs to protect itself
> from threats, and this protection might mean expulsion, suspension or
> other unfortunate measures, but
On Thu, May 31, 2007, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> I don't like it at first read, but you may provide examples of
> situations where such a procedure could be useful. In particular, just
> determining "who's right" doesn't help much. As for determining what
> punishments are plausible, isn't this
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 01:49:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The role of jurors in the US legal system is not to interpret the law
> (jurors are commonly given explicit direction about the standard that must
> be met for the defendant to be guilty of a particular charge), but to decide
> wheth
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:33:02AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:12:57PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Randomly selected juries avoid the "cabal" problem -- it's transparent
> > who gets involved, it's not limited to some people, it's not
> > the same people al
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:12:57PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Randomly selected juries avoid the "cabal" problem -- it's transparent
> who gets involved, it's not limited to some people, it's not
> the same people all the time, and it's a bit easier to deal with
> (perceived/claimed/whatever) co
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:50:20AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> A 'probi viri' team should be appinted by voting IMHO, as in the DPL case.
s/appinted/appointed/
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:30:28PM -0400, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> >
> >Hey, why not? A third idea: instead of having delegates or a committee
> >or whatever to decide amongst disputes, how about randomly selecting a
> >jury from DDs and having their word (on who's right, on what punishment
> >is
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:30:28PM -0400, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> >Hey, why not? A third idea: instead of having delegates or a committee
> >or whatever to decide amongst disputes, how about randomly selecting a
> >jury from DDs and having their word (on who's right, on what punishment
> >is pla
9 matches
Mail list logo
