On Sunday, 20 November 2022 21:54:14 CET Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> If we're going to get Bookworm out, now is a good time to be thinking of
> things that could usefully be removed to lower a maintenance burden
Sorry, but I find this a non-argument.
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/fortune-mod
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 08:54:14PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> I suspect there is also a slight difference of understanding of the merits of
> free speech on either
> side of the Atlantic: it's a cultural thing and I suspect I tend to the
> European side here :)
>
Thank you for
Hi Sam,
Thanks very much for taking the time to thoughfully articulate your
thoughts. I find myself agreeing with a great deal of what you wrote.
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 01:05:15PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> 2) I will try and build a consensus that we want the bar to be high for
>
> "Andrew" == Andrew M A Cater writes:
Andrew> I'm not going to die in a ditch over this but I raised it as
Andrew> a genuine query to the project in good faith and without any
Andrew> agenda.
I appreciate that. I hope my message was received in the spirit of an
answer to the
Hi Sam,
I respect absolutely what you say. I'm not sure that fortunes-offensive has any
particular literary
merit, I'm not sure myself that, now that the separate binary for fortunes-off
has been removed,
that the dat file merits inclusion. It was a leaf package on a small games
package that
TL;DR: I think that we need to be significantly more permissive of ideas
expressed in software in our archive, especially for software that
exhibits creative speech, than we do conduct in our community. I do not
think that the Code of Conduct is an appropriate tool for judging
software in
6 matches
Mail list logo
