Thanks everybody for your quick answers!
In summary, the debian.org mail server accepts "-" as local extension
character, and it is documented in:
- https://wiki.debian.org/DebianServiceForDD#Step_4:_Setup_your_email
- https://db.debian.org/forward.html
(On my side, I did not manage to get the
On 16159 March 1977, Charles Plessy wrote:
I was wondering if this alternative address was intended for a
purpose,
or just an accident. I ask on this list and not directly to DSA in
case
everybody who filled first and last name information also has this
alias.
This is not so important on my
Hi,
> in my case, login == lastname).
That's the twist here – it seems the debian.org mail server accepts - as a
local extension character (in addition to +). At least, I successfully received
mail at natureshadow-foobang@d.o
_-nik_
* Dominik George [2021-06-09 15:05]:
in my case, login == lastname).
That's the twist here – it seems the debian.org mail server accepts - as a
local extension character (in addition to +). At least, I successfully received
mail at natureshadow-foobang@d.o
I'm not sure if it is more official
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 09:48:52PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>Hello everybody,
>
>I am not sure where to post this, so please forgive me if I missed a
>more suitable medium.
>
>This week I received one spam at mylastname-myfirstn...@debian.org
>(or mylogin-myfirstn...@debi
Hello everybody,
I am not sure where to post this, so please forgive me if I missed a
more suitable medium.
This week I received one spam at mylastname-myfirstn...@debian.org
(or mylogin-myfirstn...@debian.org, as in my case, login == lastname).
Today I tested the address and could confirm that
On 2019-06-10 at 10:53:55 +0200, deb...@maciejpiasecki.info wrote:
> This is spam? (attachment)
> [...]
On the web archive there is a button that everybody can use to report
email as spam (or one can bounce the message to
report-lists...@lists.debian.org ), and for some mailing lists ther
Dear all,
I was trying to see the contents of debian-consultants mailing list
(for an article I'm writing) . I saw that there is only spam in the
mailing list from September 2016 till date. Can somebody remove them.
I have marked them as spam as such but still it would be nice if this
cou
* Neil McGovern , 2014-03-04, 18:19:
The review interface offers more than binary spam/ham classification.
These are the choices you have:
Out of interest, is the interface available to general DDs?
Yup, every DD can participate:
https://lists.debian.org/archive-spam-removals/review
Hi Jakub,
On 4 Mar 2014, at 17:40, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:13:06AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>>> Thanks for the suggestion. I hate to be *that guy*, but, these messages are
>>> not spam. They are damaging, time wasting and clutter our v
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:13:06AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion. I hate to be *that guy*, but, these
messages are not spam. They are damaging, time wasting and clutter our
views of our mailing lists, this is true. Perhaps it is appropriate to
use the spam
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:13:06AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> [ moving to -project which might be more appropriate for follow-ups ]
> Thanks for the suggestion. I hate to be *that guy*, but, these messages
> are not spam. They are damaging, time wasting and
Hi Christian,
[ moving to -project which might be more appropriate for follow-ups ]
Thanks for the suggestion. I hate to be *that guy*, but, these messages
are not spam. They are damaging, time wasting and clutter our views of
our mailing lists, this is true. Perhaps it is appropriate to use the
Charles Plessy writes:
> the current draft of DEP 5 contains the following instruction:
> “There are many versions of the MIT license. Please use Expat instead,
> when it matches.”
> This recommendation predates the achievements of the SPDX work group,
> which assembled a reference list of
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 02:13:22PM +0500, ktauhidu wrote:
> Good day! I have a laptop Acer Aspire 5520g on it does not work the
> microphone. Tell me how to fix the problem. Installed debian 2.22.2 build
> 18/09/2008
Please contact the user support list, debian-u...@lists.debian.org (and
incl
On 11/11/10 17:28, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Not that I have time to do this, but it occurs to me that setting up
> something fairly similar to Flattr but not involving money would be
> straightforward. I'm imagining a system where someone can sign up for an
> account and is automatically given some s
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 08:27:01AM +, Philip Hands wrote:
> How about making the planet disarm all links that point elsewhere than
> the same domain as the blog post that contains it? Perhaps a little
> too draconian?
Yes, because there can be genuine reasons for doing so.
E.g., when I want
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> (I guess I didn't have “financial gain” in mind when I added this link
> at the bottom of my posts, rather the opportunity to see whether people
> liked getting status updates about the packages I maintain, or stuff I
> do in general.)
Not that I have time to do this, b
On 2010-11-11, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> at the bottom of my posts, rather the opportunity to see whether
> people liked getting status updates about the packages I maintain, or
> stuff I do in general.)
it is because I like reading what people do in and outside debian that I
read planet.
/Sune
Hi Holger,
Holger Levsen (08/11/2010):
> since a while, we see unsolicted commercial links and images on
> planet, mostly about flattr.
>
> […]
>
> How much spam do you find tolerable? Would it be ok if I sell
> advertisment space on my blog and syndicate this to planet?
Dne, 11. 11. 2010 01:23:51 je Stefano Zacchiroli napisal(a):
general unhappiness (at least as it appears from this list, which is
not
necessarily representative of all developers, users, etc., obviously).
I'll take the above statement as an invitation to add my 2¢. (As merely
a user of Deb
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:23:51 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I disagree that this thread is flattr-specific.
/me too.
> It clearly is the most cited example, most likely because is what we all
> have in mind and because Flattr is quite popular these days. Still, I
> don't think anybody is tr
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 05:24:40PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I don't know on what your summary is based. Looking at the replies, we
> have about 50% persons that wants to filter it and 50% that don't mind
> keeping them.
It was based on my own perception of the general feeling, by re-reading
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 08:20:13PM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Hi!
* Sune Vuorela [101110 18:19]:
>> I am annoyed by the flattr advertisement and I stayed away from
>> the thread becuase my opinion was already represented, not point
>> in repeating them. If you are going do a 'pol
Ana Guerrero writes:
> I am annoyed by the flattr advertisement and I stayed away from the
> thread becuase my opinion was already represented, not point in
> repeating them. If you are going do a 'poll' based on the people
> participating, add 1 to the list of annoyed people.
+1
--
\ “
Hi!
* Sune Vuorela [101110 18:19]:
> >> I am annoyed by the flattr advertisement and I stayed away from the thread
> >> becuase my opinion was already represented, not point in repeating them.
> >> If you are going do a 'poll' based on the people participating, add
> >> 1 to the list of annoy
On 2010-11-10, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I'm not particularly happy with the 'flattr this' buttons either. My
> main problem is that I find quite difficult to avoid interpreting them
> as DMUP violations, specifically about DMUP point "don't use Debian
> Facilities for private financial gain".
On 2010-11-10, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Ana Guerrero wrote:
>
>> I am annoyed by the flattr advertisement and I stayed away from the thread
>> becuase my opinion was already represented, not point in repeating them.
>> If you are going do a 'poll' based on the people participating, add
>> 1 to
Ana Guerrero wrote:
> I am annoyed by the flattr advertisement and I stayed away from the thread
> becuase my opinion was already represented, not point in repeating them.
> If you are going do a 'poll' based on the people participating, add
> 1 to the list of annoyed people.
Same here, plus
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 05:24:40PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > My next question for you (assuming you accept that a discussion on this
> > list is enough to decide on this matter---I personally do) is whether
> > you find that my summa
the
discussion.
Your summary was:
> Moving forward from my personal view and trying to summarize this
> thread, I'd say that most of the participants are OK with sporadic usage
> of this kind of "spam", but that it is not quite welcome that it becomes
> a habit.
That&#
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:20:46PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Are you going to ask DSA to rule this?
No, I won't, because (as already mentioned) I concede it's a gray area
and, more importantly, because I believe in a community based on rough
consensus more than on a community based on judges
* Raphael Hertzog [2010-11-10 16:21]:
> AFAIK the DMUP rules were meant to avoid problems that DSA would have to
> deal with (either legal problems or supplementary useless work). I don't
> think that the presence or the absence of a flattr button/link is going to
> make any difference in terms o
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I'm not particularly happy with the 'flattr this' buttons either. My
> main problem is that I find quite difficult to avoid interpreting them
> as DMUP violations, specifically about DMUP point "don't use Debian
> Facilities for private financia
ending other things to flattr seems way less
problematic (maybe a bit ironically).
Moving forward from my personal view and trying to summarize this
thread, I'd say that most of the participants are OK with sporadic usage
of this kind of "spam", but that it is not quite welcome that
This argument is similar to the “oh, but you
can always opt-out of our spam^Wnewsletter by clicking here” argument.
Annoying stuff, whether ads or spying, should be opt-in, period.
If the source insists on making it opt-out, then I'm in favour of
filtering it at the intermediary stage (the ag
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > For some value of "any". Planet has a big audience, articles are seen by
> > more than 3 persons so it's difficult to speak for them.
>
> How do you get that number?
Feedburner statistics. But I was wrong, it's not that many. That numbers
includes
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 02:26:25 +0200, Faidon Liambotis
wrote:
> Holger Levsen wrote:
> > since a while, we see unsolicted commercial links and images on planet,
> > mostly
> > about flattr.
...
> On the issue at hand, my personal view is that I am a bit annoyed by the
> flattr “ads” on Planet as
>> > I even encourage users to use flattr to support free software with one
>> > blog post per month. Is this spam according to you?
>> Do it once in a while for whatever other project and there is not much reason
>> to complain.
> I don't understand. I ha
with Flattr is not the main motivation
behind my articles.
> > I even encourage users to use flattr to support free software with one
> > blog post per month. Is this spam according to you?
>
> Do it once in a while for whatever other project and there is not much reason
> to c
Holger Levsen wrote:
since a while, we see unsolicted commercial links and images on planet, mostly
about flattr.
I have a feeling that we're generalizing a specific problem, trying to
draw a line on what's acceptable on Planet and what's not, which IMHO is
impossible get a consensus on.
I
Hi,
On Montag, 8. November 2010, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> No. I would want it to be the same as with other languages - the feed
> owner is responsible to provide a feed that is clean of this.
sounds like a good solution to me.
> I think it depends on the amount of it. A one time "hey, i wrote this
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:31:32PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Somehow you need to take into account how often this happens, whether
> the article provide value for a majority of planet readers, etc. It's
> difficult to set a clear limit.
To me that's the real test. If it looks like there are a
.
Might not be the intention, but feels like it to me.
> I even encourage users to use flattr to support free software with one
> blog post per month. Is this spam according to you?
Do it once in a while for whatever other project and there is not much reason
to complain.
> What I do is t
hat tell flattr anything about the people browsing the web - by linking
the image from flattr servers. Stupido extremo.
> How much spam do you find tolerable? Would it be ok if I sell advertisment
> space on my blog and syndicate this to planet? You know, I need to eat too...
Its on a debian
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> On Mon, 08 Nov 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Where I personally draw the line is that I'm fairly comfortable with
>> Debian-involved people advertising their own services on Planet Debian:
>> their own companies, their own consulting services, their own posts,
>> and so f
Hi,
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Where I personally draw the line is that I'm fairly comfortable with
> Debian-involved people advertising their own services on Planet Debian:
> their own companies, their own consulting services, their own posts, and
> so forth. I would start gettin
concerned.
I even encourage users to use flattr to support free software with one
blog post per month. Is this spam according to you?
> I think we as a project should not tolerate such, agree so, and provide
> simple
> filter mechanisms, so that people can continue to have these links in _thei
Holger Levsen writes:
> How much spam do you find tolerable? Would it be ok if I sell
> advertisment space on my blog and syndicate this to planet? You know, I
> need to eat too...
Where I personally draw the line is that I'm fairly comfortable with
Debian-involved people adverti
on http://planet.debian.org
If there is agreement that such content should not be visible on planet, the
filters wouldn't have to be perfect, instead, the people being filtered would
make sure that their flattr-invitations are indeed filtered out.
What do you think?
How much spam do you
Lars Wirzenius writes:
> Actually, I am starting to think that maintaining a long list of license
> shortnames in DEP-5, many of which refer to rarely used licenses, is
> perhaps too much effort. Since the list really should be shared with
> other projects (SPDX and Fedora especially), it would p
Guten Abend Cord,
Am 2008-12-30 19:00:41, schrieb Cord Beermann:
> svn://svn.alioth.debian.org/svn/pkg-listmaster
Hmmm, I can not connect...
It seems, Telefonica/O2 and Bougues Telecom are blocking something
> >(Wo bekommet man das Script oben rechts für die VORRATSDATENSPEICHERUNG?)
>
> http:/
Hallo! Du (Michelle Konzack) hast geschrieben:
>> yes. we do that already. see
>> http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-listmaster/ which represents our
>> running Amavis/SA-setup.
>
>For three seconds I was on the link above, but there is nothing visibel.
>I was looking in the CVS... Checked the
Good evening Cord,
Guten Abend Cord,
Am 2008-12-29 14:20:10, schrieb Cord Beermann:
> Hallo! Du (Michelle Konzack) hast geschrieben:
> >Tried to educate "spamassassin" for this kind of languages?
>
> yes. we do that already. see
> http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-listmaster/ which represents
Hallo! Du (Michelle Konzack) hast geschrieben:
>In how many languages do you receive messages?
>
>I get german, english, french, spanish, portugues, arabic, turkish and
>persian messages
>
>Some times I get korean and chinese to because I have business contacts
>there.
>
>Tried to educate "spama
herwise); it seems also that my setup does know
> how to figure out that it is spam but yours doesn't.
In how many languages do you receive messages?
I get german, english, french, spanish, portugues, arabic, turkish and
persian messages
Some times I get korean and chinese to because I ha
mate list mail, or are
subscribed to lists that send almost no legitimate mail, you won't be
automatically unsubcribed. The thresholds are set relatively high to
avoid this.
> it seems also that my setup does know how to figure out that it is
> spam but yours doesn't.
If you'r
Jeroen Massar wrote:
The politics though is really nasty.
Yes, I agree completely.
It seems this need for people to unsubscribe (and thus not being able to
participate in Debian) is quite a hard tendency. Too many people already
in the project and nothing to do or something? Or didn't get you
[ Nicely showing good will - Merry X-mas everyone! ]
Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>> And yes, my SMTP server and those of a lot of other people will
>> CORRECTLY refuse to accept mail classified as spam and correctly
>> give a 500 S
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Sport Fishing Institute of BC wrote:
> Hello I received this e-mail from the address listed below and I just want
> to see if it is really from your company before I respond to it.
It's got nothing to do with us; the address in question is actually a
mailing list dealing with
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:16:53PM -0700, Sport Fishing Institute of BC wrote:
> Hello I received this e-mail from the address listed below and I just want
> to see if it is really from your company before I respond to it.
Spam. Debian is not a company, our website is not new, and website
Hello I received this e-mail from the address listed below and I just want
to see if it is really from your company before I respond to it.
Thank you,
Kristin
-Original Message-
From: Isbel Wiggins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September-25-08 8:45 PM
To: sportfishing.bc.ca
Subject: W
Thank you Cyril and David for the information.
Augustin.
--
http://minguo.info/ better election methods
http://minguo.info/usa/ the USA FA/DP
Free Association with Delegable Proxy: an internet experiment in
democracy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 17:46 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > If this is not the proper venue to ask, may I be directed to the
> right
> > person?
>
> If you need to contact the listmasters, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You
> probably want to try and contact IIRC -owner anyway, to get
> list-specific chang
Hi.
On 08/01/2008, Augustin wrote:
> I am subscribed to the debian-chinese-big5 list.
> Unfortunately, since a few days ago, there has been a LOT of spam
> traffic (and only that).
See http://cord.de/blog/index.php?entry=entry080108-144308 (linked from
planet.d.o)
> If this is no
Hello,
I am subscribed to the debian-chinese-big5 list.
Unfortunately, since a few days ago, there has been a LOT of spam
traffic (and only that).
Could someone:
1) make the list posting open to members only.
2) kick out the spammers.
3) delete the spam from the archives.
4) If a moderator
Hi,
four people have checked the spam web form submissions concerning
debian-project. More background can be found at [1]. Thanks to Bas
Wijnen, Paul Wise, and Richard Hecker for reviewing! (Of course, a
special mention to Y Giridhar Appaji Nag who already looked through
debian-devel, but that
Hello Raphael,
Raphael Geissert wrote:
> I know this won't help dealing with already received spam and such, but it
> may help reduce the amount of spam received in the future.
Reducing the amount of spam is good. However, when I wrote
>> Also note that all this is about the ar
Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I administer some servers with customers and these are some of the facts
> I've found:
> * Many spam emails do not comply with the specs
>Meaning: enforcing the RFC's when receiving emails could block some spam
I a
Hello Thomas
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>
> Maybe we could start with debian-project at the present and go back in
> time from there until we get bored, but I'm open to suggestions.
I administer some servers with customers and these are some of the facts
I've found:
* Many
Le Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:50:02AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> The Unsure would be manually inspected, and used to further
> train the filters; as well as any erroneous classification
> (TOE). Periodically, we TUNE (Train Until No Error) the Corpus.
Maybe another heuristic to tri
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:51:42 +0100, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi Manoj,
> If you have suggestions how automatic testing can be incorporated into
> the a spam-removal process in a way that is acceptable to the project,
> I'd be very happy to seem them
Hi Manoj,
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hmm. I'll be happy to help automate some of the decision making
> using my Spam classification mechanisms; please look at
>http://www.golden-gryphon.com/software/spam/crm114_accuracy.html
> to see the lower bound on accuracy I
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:24:19 +0100, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi, if people are interested to spam-removal happen, I am looking for
> help testing how this would work. You need
> - a GPG key that is somewhat close to the Debian keyring,
> - to look at hundred
Hi,
if people are interested to spam-removal happen, I am looking for help
testing how this would work.
You need
- a GPG key that is somewhat close to the Debian keyring,
- to look at hundreds of messages that induced people to click on "this
is spam" button and sort them into spam
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 10:22:00PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it has been claimed that the Debian list archives contain spam email
> messages.
>
> There is a "report as spam" button in on the list archive page of each
> message, but presently, spam i
Hi,
it has been claimed that the Debian list archives contain spam email
messages.
There is a "report as spam" button in on the list archive page of each
message, but presently, spam is by and large not removed from the
archives. The submissions seem to help (more or less) with findin
time is that mail to
mulitple named recipients would bypass the more stringent spam
filters, which (in combination with /var filling up) was responsible
for more spam than normal hitting the lists. That has also been
rectified.
As always, if there is spam that is making it through the lists, feel
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 09:15:38PM +0200, Cord Beermann wrote:
> Hallo! Du (Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña) hast geschrieben:
>
> >If there any concerns from listmasters related to this patch I would really
> >like to hear them and would try to give a hand to make these improvements get
> >used in
Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/07/msg00011.html
> Especially the listarchive-part is currently nearly without manpower.
Yeah, how's that going? Please send a second call if you don't find
enough non-European help.
Regards,
--
MJR/sl
Hallo! Du (Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña) hast geschrieben:
>If there any concerns from listmasters related to this patch I would really
>like to hear them and would try to give a hand to make these improvements get
>used in our web archives.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/07
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 07:32:19PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > If the one thing keeping us from deleting list spam (which I found out
> ...we don't...
> > after reporting entire months of d-devel spam) is the indexing and thus
> > linkin
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> If the one thing keeping us from deleting list spam (which I found out
...we don't...
> after reporting entire months of d-devel spam) is the indexing and thus
> linking, I'd happily try to come up with a patch that makes mhonarc deal
> with the
Hi all,
As most of you will have noticed, there was a particularly bad SPAM attack
against the BTS today. Filters are in place now.
In view of the extremely high amount of mail, we have decided to make an
exception and clean up the list archives.
Al in all 35 lists were hit. To give an idea of
lista de emails de empresas lista de emails de . Venda de mala direta listas
de e-mails, software mala direta programa para spam, programa para mala direta
programa para enviar email. Programa de mala direta opt in emails:
Visite agora:
http://www.divulgaemails.com
Mala-direta mala direta via
lista de emails de empresas lista de emails de . Venda de mala direta listas
de e-mails, software mala direta programa para spam, programa para mala direta
programa para enviar email. Programa de mala direta opt in emails:
Visite agora:
http://www.divulgaemails.com
Mala-direta mala direta via
Hi!
* Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060303 16:15]:
[ merchandising stuff for events ]
> The problem with that page is that most of the material is quite old. Even
> up to six years old!
> Debian tends to have quite a bit of old unmaintained stuff lying around.
> That said, this is not a proble
"Alexander Schmehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060302 22:40]:
wow, those were cool. Any others? Ones that look more like
advertising/marketing/promotional?
Like those?
http://www.debian.org/events/material#posters
Hi!
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060302 22:40]:
> wow, those were cool. Any others? Ones that look more like
> advertising/marketing/promotional?
Like those?
http://www.debian.org/events/material#posters
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
--
http://learn.to/quote/
http://www.catb.org/~e
wow, those were cool. Any others? Ones that look more like
advertising/marketing/promotional?
> Original Message
> Subject: [SPAM] Re: Debian Wall Posters
> From: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, March 02, 2006 3:31 pm
> To:
Hi,
* Lech Karol Paw?aszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-01 19:04]:
> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 13:58, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Tuesday 31 January 2006 21:26, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> > > Simply ignore it. Seems like automatic proposition to exchange l
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 13:58, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 31 January 2006 21:26, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> > Simply ignore it. Seems like automatic proposition to exchange links, so
> > it's spam.
>
> whatever... I just ignore mails in l
Hi,
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 21:26, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> Simply ignore it. Seems like automatic proposition to exchange links, so
> it's spam.
whatever... I just ignore mails in languages I dont understand (also because I
know that if it's important, someon
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What are you talking about? This 'discussion' was started by
> Benjamin "Mako" Hill and the people who signed his 'pledge'. I was
> forced to respond, and as I noted in my first mail on the subject, I
> had not wanted to ever have to fight this battle.
Steve Langasek writes:
> Hmm, how do you measure that, exactly? Are you really meaning to say
> that Andrew's posts are directly contributing to a culture of witch
> hunts? Or are you really referring to some other standard of "making
> things worse" here?
Andrew's posts are making it easier for
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 06:46:11AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Andrew Suffield writes:
> > I really *don't care* what effect it has on me. The point is to show
> > how very bad their actions are, so that people don't ever do something
> > like this again. Debian does not need a culture of witchhun
Andrew Suffield writes:
> It seems to be working.
No it isn't. It's making things worse.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 05:25:52PM -0600, Eldon Koyle wrote:
> On Aug 13 0:02+0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 12:10:07AM +0200, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
> > > For how long do we have to continue to wade through this flood of
> > > emails regarding the terrible state of hea
please stop, do not start a third thread about that.
I thought there were some common rules for flames we should try to
apply. IIRC during the DPL election, this was discussed a lot : should
we moderate lists ? or limit post numbers per DD ? the answer was : we
have to behave less childish, and
Eldon Koyle writes:
> I'll agree that the pledge to killfile you doesn't seem like the best
> solution...
This is the first I've heard of it. Not only is it not the best solution,
it's appalling. Andrew has been in my killfile for years, but he's coming
out now.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCR
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
