On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 05:14:35PM +0100, Noèl Köthe wrote:
> after long time I started working on http://www.debian.org/consultants/
> to get it into a usefull page again. Right now there a alot of entries
> outdated and there is no sorting in the countries.
Thank you.
> The first step I want to
> > In the past we added everything, really everthing to this list
> > whithout quality checks.:( They cannot be done whithout a mini
> > policy, imho.
>
> What does a web page have to do with quality of service, or even
> with availability?
I agree.
> > We (Debian) should have a minimum of qual
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 17:14:35 +0100, Noèl Köthe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hello, after long time I started working on
> http://www.debian.org/consultants/ to get it into a usefull page
> again. Right now there a alot of entries outdated and there is no
> sorting in the countries.
> The first st
On Monday 01 November 2004 17.14, Noèl Köthe wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/consultants/
I think one thing that is very difficult but should be defined is: how do we
defend against bogus entries?
With CD vendor entries, we had again and again that people didn't get the
CDs etc., and after a few
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Debian consulting has been something on my mind recently, so this
topic is well timed.
After reading over the thread thus far, my thoughts are that the
requirement for being listed is a minimum of 2 or 3 means of
contact information of the con
* Noèl Köthe:
> The first step I want to discuss with you is that right now there is no
> real policy about who will be added to this page. In my opinion these
> minimal policy should be enough:
When will you delist a consultant? Only if these criteria are no
longer met?
You should probably doc
On 2004-11-01 20:14:38 + Noèl Köthe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Montag, den 01.11.2004, 16:37 + schrieb MJ Ray:
>> Thank you for working on this. I thought they were sorted by date received
>> in the countries?
> This is correct but its not described anywhere and not helpfull for the
Am 2004-11-01 21:28:26, schrieb martin f krafft:
> also sprach Noèl Köthe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.01.2120 +0100]:
> > > I don't operate a website and do not plan on doing so. Please do
> >
> > Why?
>
> Why should I? I work locally and my clients refer each other to me.
> That has worked for
also sprach Noèl Köthe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.01.2228 +0100]:
> :( Sadly you dont comment the last 2 examples. How to handle them?
> I want a way how to handle them and not discuss URL vs non-URL.
I see no reason not to list Hemanth Kumar. However, John Brahy
should be asked to remove the UR
Am Montag, den 01.11.2004, 22:03 +0100 schrieb martin f krafft:
> > So you dont need to be listed there?;)
>
> Well, I'd say 'touché', but I don't think so. Being listed there is
> *is* helpful, and it's like a phone book entry. Being listed in the
> phone book or on a reference page like this sh
also sprach Noèl Köthe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.01.2150 +0100]:
> > Why should I? I work locally and my clients refer each other to me.
> > That has worked for me for years.
>
> So you dont need to be listed there?;)
Well, I'd say 'touché', but I don't think so. Being listed there is
*is* hel
Am Montag, den 01.11.2004, 21:28 +0100 schrieb martin f krafft:
> > > I don't operate a website and do not plan on doing so. Please do
> >
> > Why?
>
> Why should I? I work locally and my clients refer each other to me.
> That has worked for me for years.
So you dont need to be listed there?;)
also sprach Noèl Köthe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.01.2120 +0100]:
> > I don't operate a website and do not plan on doing so. Please do
>
> Why?
Why should I? I work locally and my clients refer each other to me.
That has worked for me for years.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me
Am Montag, den 01.11.2004, 18:01 +0100 schrieb martin f krafft:
> also sprach Noèl Köthe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.01.1714 +0100]:
> > 1. working URL entry
> > (if it timeouts its OK but if the URL doesn't resolve or the domain
> > isn't connected anymore the entry will be removed)
>
> I don't
Am Montag, den 01.11.2004, 16:37 + schrieb MJ Ray:
Hi,
> > after long time I started working on http://www.debian.org/consultants/
> > to get it into a usefull page again. Right now there a alot of entries
> > outdated and there is no sorting in the countries.
>
> Thank you for working on th
also sprach Noèl Köthe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.01.1714 +0100]:
> 1. working URL entry
> (if it timeouts its OK but if the URL doesn't resolve or the domain
> isn't connected anymore the entry will be removed)
I don't operate a website and do not plan on doing so. Please do
not make this a req
On 2004-11-01 16:14:35 + Noèl Köthe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> after long time I started working on http://www.debian.org/consultants/
> to get it into a usefull page again. Right now there a alot of entries
> outdated and there is no sorting in the countries.
Thank you for working on this.
> What do you think?
> Do you agree I can use this as policy for the decisions of
> additions/removals on the page?
I agree. :-)
Hello,
after long time I started working on http://www.debian.org/consultants/
to get it into a usefull page again. Right now there a alot of entries
outdated and there is no sorting in the countries.
The first step I want to discuss with you is that right now there is no
real policy about who wi
19 matches
Mail list logo
