Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly
violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?
He is also violating the license grant, Courts would not be fooled by
his scheme to prevent redistribution.
The license grant the Linux Kernel is distributed
Obviously, consensus is that blobs were, and still are, essential for
Linux's status as a popular commercially viable OS.
I'm wondering at the same time if they are considered a necessary
evil, and wonder if there would be support [1] to try to work together
with vendors to free the firmware
2f7aa8780907071318v36bf6c66m721843817883a...@mail.gmail.com
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 10:18:43PM +0200, Kees de Jong wrote:
I'm a satisfied Debian user for almost a year now. But a week ago I tried
Ubuntu 9.04 and I discovered the features of the 2.6.28 kernel and the
features of Gnome 2.26 and
On Tue,07.Jul.09, 15:59:10, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
P. S. I'd request someone who knows more than me to please write an
FAQ answer for Why does Ubuntu have/do/... but not Debian? When will
Debian have it?... type question.
Something like this?
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:40:13PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Tue,07.Jul.09, 15:59:10, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
P. S. I'd request someone who knows more than me to please write an
FAQ answer for Why does Ubuntu have/do/... but not Debian? When will
Debian have it?... type question.
Le mardi 07 juillet 2009 à 22:18 +0200, Kees de Jong a écrit :
So my question is pretty straightforward; are there plans to introduce
these two great enhancements into the Debian project?
No. We’ve decided that lenny would be our last release.
And if they are when can I expect them? I've
be our last release.
Josselin, sarcasm as a way of making a point is a two-edged sword, and
in this case not really helpful. Save it for the flamewars on
debian-devel and on planet.debian.org instead...
To OP: Josselin is just being unhelpful; linux kernel 2.6.30 has
already been integrated
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 10:18:43PM +0200, Kees de Jong wrote:
I'm a satisfied Debian user for almost a year now. But a week ago I tried
Ubuntu 9.04 and I discovered the features of the 2.6.28 kernel and the
features of Gnome 2.26 and I was impressed.
So my question is pretty straightforward;
2007/9/12, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[ Reply-to set to debian-project, debian-devel is not the place for such a
discussion if people really want to have it ]
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
2007/9/12, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Miriam Ruiz
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
I'm not proposing anything... I said that IMO it's not worth discussing
it. I just wanted you to acknowledge that some people can legitimately have
other opinions and that your question was somewhat ignoring that fact.
I never said they couldn't,
Scripsit Dave Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[thread from -private; quotes trimmed to remove not explicitly
declassified text]
I believe Tim is using proxy to mean caching proxy, i.e. it can
serve up content in its own right even if the source machine is
unavailable.
I believe Henning might be
Title: SCTP on Linux kernel 2.4
Hi,
I wish to know if you have any distribution (free or commercial) of Debian Linux
that has SCTP (lksctp or other) with Linux Kernel 2.4
Thanks Regards,
Arun P Nair
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 11:10:54AM +0100, Robert Ribnitz wrote:
Second, there are two ways to get a 2.4.x (x12 have a local root exploit,
x=14 has some problems with the ntfs driver among other things, so I
recommend 2.4.12 or 2.4.13) to run on your system:
Anything between 2.4.10 and
of the linux kernel or compiling it.
Greetings
Theo Houtman
Dear Mr Houtman,
first of all please do not send html-mail, or mail with attachments to this
list, since many people are unable to handle such mail.
Second, there are two ways to get a 2.4.x (x12 have a local root exploit,
x=14 has
the time to learn
all the ins and outs of the linux kernel or compiling it.
Greetings
Theo Houtman
_IncrediMail - Email has finally
evolved - Click
Here
Theo Houtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like to complain about the debian distribution.
You *can* complain all you want. Debian won't be release earlier because
of that. Debian will be released when it's ready. The only thing that
will help getting Debian released is by testing, finding bugs
simply don't have the time to
learn
all the ins and outs of the linux kernel or compiling it.
Greetings
Theo Houtman
Adrian Bunk has made some inoffitial packages needed to run Potato
with 2.4.* kernels. Have a look at
http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/kernel-24.html
Jö.
--
Das Leben ist eine
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Peter Makholm wrote:
I like to complain about the debian distribution.
You *can* complain all you want. Debian won't be release earlier because
of that. Debian will be released when it's ready. The only thing that
will help getting Debian released is by testing, finding
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 07:43:57PM +0100, Alexander List wrote:
If we don't stop answering user's requests/complaints in such an
unfriendly manner, we will always have the image that Debian is a clumsy
hackers-only distribution and not for the average user.
Even if his claim that kernel 2.4
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 08:18:53PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 07:04:33PM +0100, Theo Houtman wrote:
[whining about the lack of Linux 2.4.x in stable]
[...]
special to do that (but certain things like modutils and
ipchains/netfilter may need updating, check the list
20 matches
Mail list logo
