Taking this to -project, since i am no more a DD.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 07:20:03AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:52:11AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Decision
After reading through
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
Taking this to -project, since i am no more a DD.
I'm very unsure whether this was a reasonable move but I will at least
remove quotings from private. I also must have missed the point in
some mails because I have not seen any sign that you were
Sven Luther wrote:
Taking this to -project, since i am no more a DD.
Not sure if all readers here have the original. Sven has not been
expulsed and hence is still a DD.
Regards,
Joey
--
Life is a lot easier when you have someone to share it with. -- Sean Perry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Sven Luther wrote:
So, after Andrew Suffield, after Jonathan/Ted Walter, it is my turn, because i
Before everybody starts to believe this, Andrew Suffield has not been expulsed
either.
Regards,
Joey
--
Life is a lot easier when you have someone to share it with. -- Sean Perry
--
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:50:04AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
Taking this to -project, since i am no more a DD.
I'm very unsure whether this was a reasonable move but I will at least
remove quotings from private. I also must have missed the point
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
So, after Andrew Suffield, after Jonathan/Ted Walter, it is my turn,
Mentioning yourself in this row is like comparing apples and pears
(hope that this figure works also in English) and I'm really sad that
you
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:10:13PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
So, after Andrew Suffield, after Jonathan/Ted Walter, it is my turn,
because i
Before everybody starts to believe this, Andrew Suffield has not been expulsed
either.
No, but he was under an expulsion
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:45:09AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Essentially, what I guess I'm suggesting is that the debian project's
government is malfunctioning. I know it may be a controversial
analogy, but if you see DAMs as our disciplinary panel, our judges,
then we have given them too few
Sven Luther wrote:
Joey, if i came back in a year, at the minor difference between me and others,
it would be he is backsliding again, and another round of this mess.
This entirely depends you your own behaviour. I hope you're doing well
in the meantime and can come back relaxed.
Regards,
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, you where not opposed to the likes of Frans, Manoj and Anthony, ...
I think I tend to express my disagreement in different amplitude but even
more importantly different *frequency*.
I wonder if sending mails like this to debian-project is your
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:58:34PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
Hello Sven,
1) I am very curious about your medical degree, and how you managed to
diagnostic a mental disorder. Does this not strike you as a bit haughty ?
No, I'm very clearly saying that I'm not qualified to do such as
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
This one is also different in a way: the suspension seems to stop Sven
Luther's positive contributions, but as far as I can tell, it doesn't
stop what were described as his negative contributions, mainly to
mailing lists and the BTS. The punishment does not
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:55:24PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Joey, if i came back in a year, at the minor difference between me and
others,
it would be he is backsliding again, and another round of this mess.
This entirely depends you your own behaviour. I hope
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:27:54PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, you where not opposed to the likes of Frans, Manoj and Anthony, ...
I think I tend to express my disagreement in different amplitude but even
more importantly different *frequency*.
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
[...] Sven, while continuing beeing your fiend [...]
Paging Dr Freud Paging Dr Freud... ;-)
Hmmm, I did not intended to be active in this thread any more, but
I need some enlightement to decipher this. [...]
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Sven, will you stop replying -private mails on -project ?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:54:44PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Sven, will you stop replying -private mails on -project ?
Why should i ? I have been expelled from debian, and can't read -private
anymore, so
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:54:44PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Sven, will you stop replying -private mails on -project ?
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:09:54PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:54:44PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Disclosing messages from -private without poster's agreement is a real
bad attitude.
[-private trimmed]
I agree, but Sven Luther is not the first person to do that. He's not
even the first person to widen circulation of a conversation
unilaterally in this
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:49:29PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:32:48PM +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:09:54PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On
Hi!
* Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070328 14:32]:
42nd time: you have not been expelled. And no, I don't want to hear
again that it's the same.
Right, you don't want to hear, just like i was not banned from the lists in
december, right ?
No, you haven't been banned, neither back in
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:54:44PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Sven, will you stop replying -private mails on -project ?
Why should i ? I
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 09:42:42AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:54:44PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Sven, will
Hello Fellow debian developpers,
I have now come with a very grave problem, and that it is that someone has
apparently censored the wiki pages, and actually removed material there, which
is evidence in my favour in this matter, not reverted, but actually removed
from the wiki page.
The
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 07:52:48PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) :
I wanted that the expulsion be judged on his own, and not because i had
behaved or not.
Sven, this _is_ all about your behaviour.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Fellow debian developpers,
I have now come with a very grave problem, and that it is that someone has
apparently censored the wiki pages, and actually removed material there, which
is evidence in my favour in this matter, not reverted, but
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 09:56:28PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
Hello Fellow debian developpers,
I did seen a modify message like revert, to remove spam.
The deleted lines did look like links to porn.
So to me is this inquiry is about lost porn :-)
Those who believe it is about
Sven,
I don't think anything you could say will reverse this decision. If
anything people are using whatever you say against you.
As unfair as this decision might be, you would probably be better of
conserving your time for more productive tasks.
Thanks.
--
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
Sven == Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sven I now thus ask officially that the DAMs step in, and act
Sven accordying to their power and obligation, and expulse from
Sven debian whoever it was who has abused his debian account in
Sven such a way.
I don't think this is
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:45:09AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
[...] I think the route forward is to GR
changes to section 8.1, but I'm fairly sure that that will fail if I
lead it. With any luck, either a DAM or DPL will start the process
before I do.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:56:52AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
Sven,
I don't think anything you could say will reverse this decision. If
anything people are using whatever you say against you.
As unfair as this decision might be, you would probably be better of
conserving your time for more
On 3/29/07, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:56:52AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
Sven,
I don't think anything you could say will reverse this decision. If
anything people are using whatever you say against you.
As unfair as this decision might be, you would
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:03:39AM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
On 3/29/07, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:56:52AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
Sven,
I don't think anything you could say will reverse this decision. If
anything people are using whatever you say
34 matches
Mail list logo
